Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
We designed a study to evaluate the impact of a two systematic strategies for PVI with the octaspline, balloon-based PFA (B-PFA) catheter. We hypothesized that the addition of electroanatomic guidance is non-superior to fluoroscopy-only guidance in achieving durable PVI.
Study design This is a single-center, randomized clinical study enrolling consecutive paroxysmal or persistent AF patients undergoing PVI with a B-PFA catheter (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: pending). Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 basis to a fluoroscopy-only strategy vs. a strategy based on the same fluoroscopy workflow but with the addition of electroanatomic mapping (EAM).
Procedures will be carried out under deep sedo-analgesia with propofol and fentanyl. Patients will be scheduled for systematic, invasive remapping of the left atrium (LA) and pulmonary veins (PVs) a minimum of 30 days after index ablation, regardless of recurrence status.
The study will be carried out in University Hospital 12 de Octubre, a tertiary academic hospital, and has already received approval from the corresponding Institutional Review Board (code 23/208, mod. 2).
Patient data will be handled according to the current General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament (EU-GDPR) and the Council of 27 April 2016 on Personal Data Protection as well as national and local regulations regarding patient autonomy, and rights and obligations in terms of information and clinical documentation.
After a run-in phase of 10 cases per operator, 96 patients will be consecutively enrolled during a 4-month period (Figure 1).
Randomization Patients who meet all eligibility criteria and provide informed consent will be assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment arms: (1) PVI using fluoroscopy-only as guidance (control group) or (2) PVI guided by fluoroscopy with the addition of EAM (experimental group). Randomization will be performed electronically at each participating center via the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap®) platform (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA). A computer-generated permuted block sequence, with stratification by AF presentation (paroxysmal or persistent), will be used to ensure balanced allocation.
Study population Patients ≥18 years old, diagnosed with paroxysmal or persistent AF and clinical indication to undergo PVI will be included. Exclusion criteria are prior PVI or left atrial linear ablation, severe frailty or life expectancy <1 year, unwillingness or inability to provide informed consent, ablation at sites beyond PVI or indication for additional electrophysiological study, contraindication or intolerance to heparin, presence of left atrial thrombus, congenital heart disease, and pregnancy, ongoing or planned in the following 6 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fluoroscopy only | Active Comparator | Fluoroscopy-only guidance throughout the procedure |
|
| Fluoroscopy and electroanatomic mapping | Experimental | Both fluoroscopy and electroanatomic mapping guidance |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary vein isolation | Device | Pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation ablation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Durable PVI (per vein) | proportion of pulmonary veins durably isolated (i.e.: more than 30 days after index procedure); | 30 days after index procedure |
| Durable PVI (per patient) | proportion of patients with all pulmonary veins durably isolated (i.e.: more than 30 days after index procedure); | 30 days after index procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fluoroscopy exposure | fluoroscopy time during index procedure | At index procedure |
| PFA reversibility | area of reversible electroporation, measured by comparison between acute (after index procedure) and chronic (>30 day after index procedure) left atrial remapping |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Rodriguez, MD, PhD | Contact | +34917792456 | daniel.rodriguez.mnz@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Daniel Rodriguez, MD PhD | University Hospital 12 de Octubre | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital 12 de Octubre | Recruiting | Madrid | Madrid | 28041 | Spain |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001281 | Atrial Fibrillation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001145 | Arrhythmias, Cardiac |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All events related to the dual primary efficacy outcomes and primary safety outcome will be reviewed by an independent committee. These physicians will be responsible for reviewing the acute and chronic (>30 days) left atrial maps. Their role will be to determine PVI status and to define the type of adverse event according to its severity and relevance to the study. This committee will consist of three electrophysiologists who will not participate in the ablation or remapping procedures and who will be blinded to the characteristics of the index procedure.
| 30 days after index procedure |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |