Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this retrospective cohort study based on a prospectively filled registry was to determine whether standard anteroposterior pelvic radiographs with and without pelvic binder provide valuable information on pelvic ring injury anatomy and stability when compared to computed tomography images alone. The ultimate goal was to improve the management of these injuries in both emergency and definitive treatment.
At the core of the study was a stepwise pelvic imaging evaluation of pelvic ring injury patients by a panel of international pelvic trauma experts. The assessment was conducted in 3 sequential steps:
At each step, experts independently classified the injury (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthsesfragen / Orthopaedic Trauma Association and Young and Burgess classifications), assessed mechanical stability and recommended definitive treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pelvic ring injury patients with operative management within 3 weeks from injury | Pelvic ring injury patients with operative management within 3 weeks from injury |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen / Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification | Each expert determines the AO/OTA classification of the pelvic ring injury presented by the patient (total = 28 pelvic ring injuries in 28 patients) following a 3 steps sequential imaging evaluation:
Each one of the 3 provided classifications is recorded and compared to determine if standard anteroposterior pelvic radiographs (with and without a pelvic binder) add value to the information gained with computed tomography images alone in terms of injury classification. | From enrollment to the end of primary injury evaluation at day 1 |
| Young and Burgess classification | Each expert determines the Young and Burgess classification of the pelvic ring injury presented by the patient (total = 28 pelvic ring injuries in 28 patients) following a 3 steps sequential imaging evaluation: 1) Review of computed tomography images alone; 2) Addition of a standard anteroposterior pelvic radiograph with a pelvic binder; 3) Addition of a standard anteroposterior pelvic radiograph without a pelvic binder. Each one of the 3 provided classifications is recorded and compared to determine if standard anteroposterior pelvic radiographs (with and without a pelvic binder) add value to the information gained with computed tomography images alone in terms of injury classification. | From enrollment to the end of primary injury evaluation at day 1 |
| Pelvic ring mechanical stability assessment | Each expert determines the mechanical stability of the pelvic ring injury (pelvic ring fully stable, pelvic ring horizontally unstable, pelvic ring fully unstable) presented by the patient (total = 28 pelvic ring injuries in 28 patients) following a 3 steps sequential imaging evaluation: 1) Review of computed tomography images alone; 2) Addition of a standard anteroposterior pelvic radiograph with a pelvic binder; 3) Addition of a standard anteroposterior pelvic radiograph without a pelvic binder. Each one of the 3 provided assessments is recorded and compared to determine if standard anteroposterior pelvic radiographs (with and without a pelvic binder) add value to the information gained with computed tomography images alone in terms of mechanical stability assessment. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Adult pelvic ring injury patients operatively treated within 3 weeks from injury
De-identified radiographic images of the pelvis (computed tomography scanners, standard anteroposterior radiographs with and without pelvic binder)
01.01.2025 for 6 months
A panel of 8 international pelvic trauma experts was assembled based on their demonstrated expertise in the field and active involvement in relevant academic societies. These 8 experts will receive de-identified radiographic images to classifiy the injuries, evaluate pelvic stability and propose a treatment plan. No other patient data will be shared with the experts.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| From enrollment to the end of primary injury evaluation at day 1 |
| Surgical fixation plan | Each expert determines the surgical fixation plan (no fixation needed, anterior fixation only, posterior fixation only, lumboelvic fixation only, anterior and posterior fixation, anterior and lumbopelvic fixation) for the pelvic ring injury presented by the patient (total = 28 pelvic ring injuries in 28 patients) following a 3 steps sequential imaging evaluation: 1) Review of computed tomography images alone; 2) Addition of a standard anteroposterior pelvic radiograph with a pelvic binder; 3) Addition of a standard anteroposterior pelvic radiograph without a pelvic binder. Each one of the 3 provided plans is recorded and compared to determine if standard anteroposterior pelvic radiographs (with and without a pelvic binder) add value to the information gained with computed tomography images alone in terms of surgical fixation planning. | From enrollment to the end of primary injury evaluation at day 1 |