Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Impacted mandibular third molars can cause various complications to the adjacent second molars, such as dental caries, periodontitis, or root resorption. These complications often progress silently and asymptomatically. A typical scenario involves a mesioangularly impacted third molar exerting pressure on the distal alveolar bone of the second molar, resulting in persistent food impaction that is difficult for patients to clean. Furthermore, the surgical removal of deeply impacted or severely angulated mandibular third molars often requires bone removal in the area adjacent to the second molar. These factors may exacerbate distal periodontal defects of the second molar, especially in individuals over the age of 25. This research focuses on evaluating the effectiveness of a new-generation collagen membrane in promoting healing after the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars in patients at risk of distal periodontal tissue damage to the second molars
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| study | Experimental | apply collagen membrane on distal surface of second molar after third molar surgery |
|
| control | Active Comparator | standard third molar surgery without any application |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| collagen membrane | Procedure | collagen membrane apply to distal surface of second molar after third molar surgery |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Distal periodontal tissue status | distal periodontal tissue status was assessed using variables of pocket depth | preoperative (T0), 3rd moth after surgery (T3) and 6th month after surgery (T6) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Distal bone level | The variable was determined by measuring the distance from the CEJ of mandibular second molar to the highest point of the alveolar crest, performed with the periapical radiograph using the parallel technique, standardized with a film holder and a stent with a 5 mm steel segment | at the time of the end of surgery (T0'), 3rd month after surgery (T3), and 6th month after surgery (T6). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative pain | Postoperative pain was assessed by patient using the VAS (Visual Analog Scale) on the 1st, 3rd, 7th day after surgery. The VAS pain assessment scale is a 100 mm long line with 2 endpoints defined as "no pain" on the left side and "maximum pain" on the right side. The patient will record his/her pain level by marking a point on the line, the pain point will be the distance measured from the left endpoint to the point marked by patient. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phong Cu Lam, MD.DDS | Contact | +84932114888 | lamcuphong@ump.edu.vn |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh city | Recruiting | Ho Chi Minh City | Vietnam |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This type of interventional study in dentistry is referred to as a split-mouth design. In this design, the intervention subjects have bilaterally symmetrical conditions within the oral cavity, allowing one side to serve as the intervention group while the contralateral side serves as the control group.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| third molar surgery | Procedure | standard third molar surgery without any additional application |
|
| on the 1st, 3rd, 7th day after surgery |
| Postoperative swelling | Facial swelling was assessed by the patient using the modified VAS scale of Pasqualini et al (2005) on the 1st, 3rd, 7th day after surgery. The scale consisted of 6 levels from 0 (no swelling) to 5 (severe swelling), patient will choose the corresponding level of swelling. | on the 1st, 3rd, 7th day after surgery |
| Soft tissue healing | Soft tissue healing was assessed using Healing index of Landry, Turnbull, and Howley on the 7th day after surgery. The scale consists of 5 grades, from grade 1 (very poor healing) to grade 5 (excellent healing) based on signs of tissue color, bleeding, presence of granulation tissue, presence of pus, and degree of epithelialization. | on the 7th day after surgery |