Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this retrospective, multicenter, observational study is to evaluate the potential clinical benefit of adding radiotherapy (administered either concomitantly or sequentially) to immunotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
One promising approach involves the integration of radiotherapy into the treatment plan. Radiotherapy is known not only for its cytotoxic local effects, but also for its ability to modulate the tumor microenvironment, increase antigen presentation, and stimulate systemic immune responses.
This study will compare two cohorts of patients with metastatic NSCLC treated in real-world clinical settings. The first cohort includes patients treated with immunotherapy alone, while the second includes those who received immunotherapy in combination with radiotherapy. Radiotherapy may have been administered concurrently or sequentially with respect to immunotherapy, based on clinical judgment.
The primary objective is to determine whether the addition of radiotherapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) by at least 30%, compared to immunotherapy alone. This threshold reflects clinically meaningful differences reported in randomized controlled trials in similar populations and treatment lines. Secondary objectives include overall survival (OS) and exploring predictive factors of treatment response, such as patient demographics, tumor characteristics, mutational status, timing of radiotherapy and abscopal effect evaluation, to refine patient selection for future combination strategies.
Eligible participants are adults with histologically confirmed metastatic NSCLC, treated with first-line or second-line immunotherapy, and with no prior exposure to immunotherapy. Data will be retrospectively collected from medical records, and treatment arms will be assigned based on actual clinical care paths.
Participants will:
The results of this study will contribute to a better understanding of real-world outcomes in metastatic NSCLC patients and may inform future prospective trials evaluating radiotherapy as a modulator of immunotherapy efficacy.
Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a highly heterogeneous disease with variable responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors, despite their transformative impact on patient outcomes since 2015. Radiotherapy has emerged as a potential synergistic partner for immunotherapy, based not only on its established local cytotoxic effects but also on its capacity to modulate the tumor microenvironment and activate systemic anti-tumor immunity.
Several preclinical and early clinical studies have illustrated how radiation may increase tumor antigen release, upregulate MHC (Major Histocompatibility Complex) class I molecules, and enhance T-cell priming. The abscopal effect, while rare, underscores the possibility that localized radiotherapy can induce immune-mediated tumor regression at distant, non-irradiated sites. These observations support a growing rationale for combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with radiotherapy in a therapeutic strategy that goes beyond additive effects, aiming instead for immune potentiation.
This retrospective, multicenter, observational study investigates whether real-world integration of radiotherapy into immunotherapy regimens improves survival outcomes in patients with metastatic NSCLC. The study is designed to reflect routine clinical practices across participating institutions, with radiotherapy administration (either concomitant or sequential) guided by multidisciplinary clinical decision-making rather than protocolized intervention. This pragmatic approach allows for exploration of a wide range of clinical scenarios and patient profiles, including variation in timing, dose, target site, and sequence of the radiotherapy-immunotherapy combination.
In addition to comparing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients treated with immunotherapy alone versus those receiving additional radiotherapy, the study also seeks to characterize patterns of treatment response, including tumor control in non-irradiated sites, and to identify subgroups most likely to benefit from the combination strategy. Particular interest lies in the immune effect beyond the radiation field, which could serve as an indirect marker of enhanced systemic immune activation.
This study not only aims to generate meaningful insights into real-world treatment patterns and outcomes but also to provide a foundation for future prospective clinical trials. By better understanding how radiotherapy might modulate the immunotherapeutic response in metastatic NSCLC, we hope to refine patient selection, optimize treatment timing, and ultimately improve the effectiveness of immunotherapy in this challenging clinical setting.
Data will be extracted retrospectively from medical records and institutional databases. Collected data will include:
Statistical Analyses:
Ethical considerations:
This is a non-interventional study using retrospective, anonymized data. No additional procedures or patient contact are required. Institutional approvals and data protection regulations will be respected at all participating centers. The study complies with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and French data privacy laws.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immunotherapy cohort | This group includes patients with metastatic non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received immune checkpoints inhibitors (Nivolumab, Atezolizumab or Pembrolizumab) without any associated radiotherapy during the course of treatment |
| |
| Immunotherapy + radiotherapy cohort | This group includes patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (Nivolumab, Atezolizumab, or Pembrolizumab) in combination with radiotherapy. Radiotherapy was delivered either concomitantly or sequentially to immunotherapy. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immunotherapy | Drug | The immunotherapy intervention consists of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, specifically Nivolumab (OPDIVO), Atezolizumab (TECENTRIQ), Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA). These drugs are monoclonal antibodies that block PD-1 or PD-L1 pathways, aiming to enhance the immune system's ability to recognize and destroy cancer cells. The treatment is administered intravenously according to standard dosing schedules. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) | PFS is defined as the time from the first administration of immunotherapy to the date of confirmed disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Progression is assessed using imaging (CT scan, PET scan or MRI) according to iRECIST v1.1 criteria. | Up to 18 months from start of immunotherapy |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survivall (OS) | OS is defined as the time from the first administration of immunotherapy to the date of death from any cause. | Up to 18 months from start of immunotherapy |
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Non inclusion Criteria:
- Patients treated with DURVALUMAB, on the basis of its marketing authorisation in non-small cell lung cancer and in the adjuvant treatment of NSCLC treated with concomitant radiochemotherapy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer receiving immunotherapy at the metastatic stage, with no previous immunotherapy treatment.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ariane Guignard, Resident | Hopitaux privés de Metz - UNEOS | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hopitaux Privés de Metz - UNEOS | Vantoux | 57040 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002289 | Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung |
| D009362 | Neoplasm Metastasis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002283 | Carcinoma, Bronchogenic |
| D001984 | Bronchial Neoplasms |
| D008175 | Lung Neoplasms |
| D012142 | Respiratory Tract Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007167 | Immunotherapy |
| D001691 | Biological Therapy |
| D011878 | Radiotherapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D056747 | Immunomodulation |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Radiotherapy | Radiation | The radiotherapy intervention involves targeted delivery of ionizing radiation to metastatic lesions. Radiotherapy may be given either concurrently with immunotherapy or sequentially afterward, depending on the patient's treatment plan. The purpose is to achieve local tumor control and potentially enhance the systemic immune response through immunogenic cell death. Different radiation techniques and dose regimens may be employed based on lesion size, location, and clinical considerations. |
|
|
ORR is defined as the best tumor response observed during treatment according to iRECIST v1.1 criteria.
Responses are evaluated based on routine imaging (CT scan, PET scan or MRI) and classified into 5 categories: complete response (iCR), partial response (iPR), stable disease (iSD), unconfirmed progressive disease (iUPD) and confirmed progressive disease (iCPD).
| Up to 18 months from start of immunotherapy |
| Objective Response Rate (ORR bis) | ORR bis is defined in patients receiving both immunotherapy and radiotherpy and refers to the evaluation of the abscopal effect, i.e. tumor response in non-irradiated lesions according to iRECIST v1.1 criteria. Responses are evaluated based on routine imaging (CT scan, PET scan or MRI) and classified into 5 categories: complete response (iCR), partial response (iPR), stable disease (iSD), unconfirmed progressive disease (iUPD) and confirmed progressive disease (iCPD). | Up to 18 months from start of immunotherapy |
| Progression Free Survival 2 (PFS-2) | PFS-2 is defined as the time from the start the therapy following immunotherapy to the date of confirmed disease progressipn or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Progression is assessed using imaging (CT scan, PET scan or MRI) according to iRECIST v1.1 criteria. | Up to 18 months from start of immunotherapy |
| Progression Free Survival after Radiotherapy (PFS RT) | PFS-RT is defined as the time from the end of radiotherapy to the date of confirmed disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Progression is assessed using imaging (CT scan, PET scan or MRI) according to iRECIST v1.1 criteria. | Up to 18 months from end of radiotherapy. |
| Frequency and severity of toxicities of combined immunotherapy and radiotherapy, according to CTCAE v5.0 grades | Grade 1 Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADL. Grade 3 Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care and activities of daily living (ADL). Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to adverse events (AE). | Up to 18 months from start of immunotherapy |
| D013899 |
| Thoracic Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D009385 | Neoplastic Processes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |