The goal of this observational cross-sectional study is to evaluate whether the combined use of Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) and Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) can assess the independent clinical competence of occupational therapy interns at Far Eastern Memorial Hospital. The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Does the performance on Mini-CEX correlate with the interns' ability to perform independently?
2. Does the use of EPAs provide additional insight into interns' readiness for unsupervised clinical practice?

Participants will:

1. Provide informed consent at the sixth week of their internship.
2. Undergo assessment with Mini-CEX and EPAs during their eighth week of clinical training.
3. Complete demographic questionnaires including age, gender, study habits, prior university experience, parental occupation, and residence area.

Medical graduates in the healthcare field apply theoretical knowledge gained during their education combined with clinical supervision to develop professional skills necessary for patient care. To comprehensively evaluate interns' professional competence during clinical training, workplace assessment tools such as the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) are commonly used. Mini-CEX, developed by the American Medical Association, assesses seven core clinical skills over a 20 to 30-minute observation period. However, Mini-CEX alone may not fully capture the interns' ability to perform independently.

Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME) emphasizes the development of core competencies, and Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) have been proposed as a framework to describe tasks that trainees should be entrusted to perform unsupervised at various training stages. EPAs assess the level of supervision required, reflecting the degree of trust clinical supervisors place in trainees. In Taiwan, EPAs tailored for occupational therapy have been developed and implemented under the guidance of the Occupational Therapy Association.

This study aims to explore the relationship between Mini-CEX and EPAs in evaluating occupational therapy interns' independent clinical competence. The study will recruit 50 interns from the physiological domain of occupational therapy at Far Eastern Memorial Hospital over four years. Participants will be recruited at the sixth week of their internship, provide informed consent, and be assessed at the eighth week using both Mini-CEX and EPAs. The assessments are part of routine clinical training evaluations and take approximately 20 minutes.

Data collected will include demographic information and assessment scores. Statistical analyses will involve descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation to examine relationships between variables, and multiple linear regression to identify predictors of clinical performance, including age, gender, study habits, prior university experience, parental occupation, and residence area. Participation is voluntary and will not affect interns' clinical training or evaluation outcomes.

This study seeks to provide evidence on whether combining Mini-CEX and EPAs offers a more reliable assessment of interns' readiness for independent clinical practice, potentially informing future educational strategies in occupational therapy training.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Occupational therapy interns in the physical domain at Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
• Provide informed consent to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

• None specified

This study population consists of occupational therapy interns undergoing physical domain fieldwork at Far Eastern Memorial Hospital. Participants are typically fourth-year students engaged in clinical internship training.

This study will not share individual participant data (IPD) due to considerations related to participant privacy and confidentiality. The data collected involve sensitive personal and demographic information of occupational therapy interns, and sharing such data could risk identification despite de-identification efforts. Additionally, the study was conducted under ethical approvals that restrict data sharing beyond the research team. Aggregate results and summary findings will be made publicly available through publications and ClinicalTrials.gov, ensuring transparency while protecting participant rights.