Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Gobierno de Cantabria | UNKNOWN |
| Loyola University | OTHER |
| University of Jaen | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of home positive parenting programs targeted to families at psychosocial risk carried out in Cantabria (Spain).
The investigators will collect information before the intervention, and every six months until the family achieves the proposed objectives (with a maximum intervention period of two years). Besides, the investigators will compare these results with information from other families that are not taking part in the program. Depending on the case, the practitioners in charge of the intervention, the main caregivers of the participating families and/or the adolescents will provide the information for the study.
The investigators expect that families participating in the programs will improve their parenting competencies, their family dynamics, and the life quality of their children.
A quasi-experimental design will be followed, with at least three evaluation moments and with a non-randomized comparison group.
Families will be referred to the PIF from social services. The participants will answer a series of questionnaires and scales, where they will give information related to sociodemographic data, parenting competencies, family functioning and children/adolescent adjustment. The information will be digitized through a computer application to which only the professional intervening with the family will have access. The app will not allow the participants to leave any question with no answer or with an incorrect answer.
To analyze the data, the investigators will use the softwares Mplus and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Families receiving intervention | Experimental | Families who are participating in the home program |
|
| Control group | No Intervention | Families who are not participating in the program and live in a comparable area where any of the intervention is offered |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family Intervention Program (PIF) | Behavioral | Home psychoeducational intervention in an individual format driven by a practitioner where caregivers learn parenting competences and children learn autonomy and emotional regulation skills |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Family functioning | SCORE rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | Before the intervention, and every six months until the family achieves the proposed objectives (with a maximum intervention period of two years) |
| Children's quality of life | KIDSCREEN-10 rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | Before the intervention, and every six months until the family achieves the proposed objectives (with a maximum intervention period of two years) |
| Satisfaction with Family Life | Satisfaction with Family Life Scale (SWFLS), rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 7. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | Before the intervention, and every six months until the family achieves the proposed objectives (with a maximum intervention period of two years) |
| Emotional intelligence | The Emotional Quotient Inventory: Youth Version (EQ-i:YV) rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 4. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | Before the intervention, and every six months until the family achieves the proposed objectives (with a maximum intervention period of two years) |
| Indicators of social integration of the family | This ad hoc instrument rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 4. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | Before the intervention, and every six months until the family achieves the proposed objectives (with a maximum intervention period of two years) |
| Children adjustment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Expectations about the intervention | This ad hoc instrument rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 4. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | Before the intervention |
| Perceived change after the intervention |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Hidalgo García | Contact | 0034954554332 | victoria@us.es | |
| Javier Pérez Padilla | Contact | 0034601373627 | jppadill@ujaen.es |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consejería de Inclusión Social, Juventud, Familias E Igualdad | Recruiting | Santander | Cantabria | 39004 | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Ugarriza Chávez, N., y Pajares Del Águila, L. (2005). La evaluación de la inteligencia emocional a través del inventario de BarOn ICE: NA, en una muestra de niños y adolescentes. Persona, 8, 11-58. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=147112816001 | ||
| Background | Bar-On, R. (1997a). Development of the Baron EQ-I: A measure of emotional and social intelligence. 105th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association in Chicago. | ||
| 10245370 | Background | Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. Eval Program Plann. 1979;2(3):197-207. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(79)90094-6. No abstract available. | |
| 16367493 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Report on the actions carried out for the advice and evaluation of the actions of the education and family intervention programs and services of the public social services of Cantabria | View source |
Not provided
The project is framed in an agreement with the Govern of Cantabria and the researchers have no authorization for sharing individual participant data.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The participants will be assigned to the manualized program according to the inclusion criteria. The comparison group will be composed of families in areas where the intervention is not available but with similar sociodemographic characteristics.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) rated on a 3-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 2. Higher scores mean a better outcome. |
| Before the intervention, and every six months until the family achieves the proposed objectives (with a maximum intervention period of two years) |
| School adjustment indicators | This ad hoc instrument rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 4. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | Before the intervention, and every six months until the family achieves the proposed objectives (with a maximum intervention period of two years) |
| Parental Competencies | The Parenting Competencies Assessment Interview (ECP - 12) rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | Before the intervention, and every six months until the family achieves the proposed objectives (with a maximum intervention period of two years) |
| Autonomy and life skills | The Life Skills Inventory (LSI) rated on a 2-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 1. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | Before the intervention, and every six months until the family achieves the proposed objectives (with a maximum intervention period of two years) |
This ad hoc instrument rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 4. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
| Every six months from the start of the intervention until the family achieves the proposed objectives (with a maximum intervention period of two years) |
| Satisfaction with the intervention | Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8), rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 4. Higher scores mean a better outcome. | Every six months from the start of the intervention until the family achieves the proposed objectives (with a maximum intervention period of two years) |
| Background |
| Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13. |
| Background | Zabriskie, R. y McCormick, B. (2003). Parent and child perspectives of family leisure involvement and satisfaction with family life. Journal of Leisure Research, 35, 163-189. doi: 10.1080/00222216.2003.11949989 |
| Background | Stratton, P., Bland, J., Janes, E. y Lask, J. (2010). Developing a practicable outcome measure for systemic family therapy: The SCORE. Journal of Family Therapy, 32, 232-258. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2010.00507.x |
| Background | European Kidscreen Groupe (2006). The KIDSCREEN questionnaires. Quality of life questionnaires for children and adolescents. Pabst Science Publ. |
| Family Intervention Program (PIF): Technical manual for its implementation and evaluation | View source |