Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of aDBS (preferred mode, single or dual threshold) vs standard continuous DBS (cDBS) in decreasing Total Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED). Prospective randomized, single-blind, crossover, multicenter study of aDBS in subjects with Parkinson's disease.
Prospective randomized, single-blind, crossover, multicenter study of aDBS in subjects with Parkinson's disease.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| aDBS Preferred Mode | Experimental |
| |
| cDBS | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adaptive DBS | Device | Subjects will receive Dual or Single Threshold aDBS which are acceptable |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Total Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) During Adaptive (aDBS) as Compared to Continuous DBS (cDBS) | Comparison of TEED between aDBS and cDBS at aDBS treatment phase (Visit 2 and Visit 3). The TEED was computed using the average stimulation currents from the timeline data during the last 14 days at Visit 2 and Visit 3. | First 45-day period after the randomization with aDBS or cDBS treatment as randomized, will be compared to the following second 45-day period of aDBS or cDBS treatment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Mean Percent Time Within an Optimal Beta LFP Threshold of Beta LFP Power During aDBS Mode Compared to cDBS. | The secondary objective is to demonstrate maintenance within an optimal beta LFP threshold of beta LFP power during aDBS mode compared to cDBS. The optimal beta LFP threshold indicates values between upper and lower LFP threshold preset for each patient. | A 45-day period of aDBS treatment will be compared to a 45-day period of cDBS treatment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juntendo University Nerima Hospital | Tokyo | Nerima-ku | 177-8521 | Japan | ||
| Juntendo University Hospital |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Randomization and Treatment Assignment 7 days or more after cDBS has been set and within 30 days after the baseline visit.
25 subjects were randomly assigned during a randomization to either sequence, the first intervention was aDBS then cDBS (aDBS -> cDBS) or the first intervention was cDBS then aDBS (cDBS -> aDBS).
First enrollment: November 29, 2021 Last patient last visit: October 23, 2023
The study was conducted at two sites located in Japan. Participants were either completed the Early Adapter I study, or they had undergone a standard assessment demonstrating their tolerability of aDBS (preferred mode).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | aDBS -> cDBS | Sequence 1: aDBS then cDBS |
| FG001 | cDBS -> aDBS | Sequence 2: cDBS then aDBS |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Intervention |
| |||||||||||||
| Second Intervention |
|
A total of 25 patients enrolled for the study were summarized.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Total | Patient in Total |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Total Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) During Adaptive (aDBS) as Compared to Continuous DBS (cDBS) | Comparison of TEED between aDBS and cDBS at aDBS treatment phase (Visit 2 and Visit 3). The TEED was computed using the average stimulation currents from the timeline data during the last 14 days at Visit 2 and Visit 3. | Fourteen patients were randomized to aDBS -> cDBS treatment sequence and eleven patients were randomized to cDBS -> aDBS treatment sequence. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | μWatts | First 45-day period after the randomization with aDBS or cDBS treatment as randomized, will be compared to the following second 45-day period of aDBS or cDBS treatment. |
|
From enrollment until study completion, up to 10 months
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | aDBS | aDBS | 0 |
Not provided
Not provided
We hypothesize that a period effect or carryover effect may be present in this cross-over design study, which could impact the ability to compare aDBS and cDBS for the primary endpoint. Therefore, exploratory analyses would be conducted to evaluate TEED between study arms to further investigate potential differences if either one is present.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Scientist | Medtronic | +818072283557 | yuta.sekiguchi@medtronic.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Oct 31, 2022 | Oct 31, 2025 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | May 12, 2023 | Oct 31, 2025 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010300 | Parkinson Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020734 | Parkinsonian Disorders |
| D001480 | Basal Ganglia Diseases |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| cDBS | Device | cDBS |
|
| Bunkyo-ku |
| Tokyo |
| 113-0033 |
| Japan |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| PD Duration | Parkinson's Disease | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
Continuous DBS |
|
|
| Secondary | The Mean Percent Time Within an Optimal Beta LFP Threshold of Beta LFP Power During aDBS Mode Compared to cDBS. | The secondary objective is to demonstrate maintenance within an optimal beta LFP threshold of beta LFP power during aDBS mode compared to cDBS. The optimal beta LFP threshold indicates values between upper and lower LFP threshold preset for each patient. | Patients with secondary endpoints available were included in the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of time | A 45-day period of aDBS treatment will be compared to a 45-day period of cDBS treatment |
|
|
|
| 25 |
| 0 |
| 25 |
| 0 |
| 25 |
| EG001 | cDBS | Continuous DBS | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D009069 | Movement Disorders |
| D000080874 | Synucleinopathies |
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |