Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl or Magnesium Sulphate as Adjuncts to Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl or Magnesium Sulphate as Adjuncts to Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy
Craniotomy presents true anesthetic challenges, mainly due to the need to optimize cerebral perfusion, facilitate brain relaxation, achieve rapid emergence for neurologic assessment, and minimize perioperative complications.
Total intravenous anesthesia, particularly with propofol-based regimens, has gained favor in neurosurgical procedures for its neuroprotective properties, and reduced intracranial pressure; however, the choice of adjunct agents in total intravenous anesthesia remains a subject of ongoing investigation, especially regarding their influence on hemodynamic stability, analgesia, brain relaxation, and postoperative outcomes.
Total intravenous anesthesia techniques for craniotomy allow rapid recovery and stable hemodynamic parameters, so they decrease the hospital stay. The current study will compare the efficacy and safety profiles of dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, and magnesium sulfate as adjuncts in total intravenous anesthesia for patients undergoing craniotomy.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: