Mechanisms of Pain Hypersensitivity in a Human Skin Inflammation Model - A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Crossover Study
Mechanisms of Pain Hypersensitivity in a Human Skin Inflammation Model - A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Crossover Study
The main goal of this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study is to understand the molecular mechanisms of inflammation-induced increased pain sensitivity (hyperalgesia). These mechanisms are studied using a recently established human model of skin inflammation that mimics aspects of skin infection. A localized inflammatory response in the skin of healthy volunteers is elicited by locally injecting a small, safe dose of Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a major component of gram-negative bacteria.
The study addresses three key research questions:
Participants will undergo an experimental session 4.5 hours after LPS injection to measure skin blood flow (using laser speckle imaging), mechanical pain sensitivity (using specialized tweezers), and pain induced by injecting a solution, of which the pH is gradually decreasing (acid-induced pain).
The study has minimal risks due to the small, safe doses of substances used ('microdosing') and aims to lay the groundwork for developing new treatments for inflammatory pain conditions.
Inflammation is recognized as a major contributor to both acute and chronic pain conditions. To develop new treatments for inflammatory pain, it is essential to understand the underlying molecular mechanisms. The skin is particularly suitable for such studies due to its accessibility. This study builds on a previously established human skin model that reflects the proinflammatory aspects of skin infection, aiming to investigate the mechanisms of inflammation-induced hyperalgesia, using various painful stimuli.
Skin and soft tissue infections encompass a range of conditions caused by gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, often involving multiple pathogens. These infections can range from superficial and relatively harmless, like furuncles, to severe and life-threatening, such as necrotizing fasciitis. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), an immunogen component of gram-negative bacterial cell walls, is commonly used in clinical research. LPS induces a strong immune response and has been safely applied in human studies both intravenously and intradermally. When injected intradermally at doses of 5-15 ng, LPS produces localized inflammatory lesions that resolve within 48 hours and do not cause systemic symptoms (CITs).
LPS acts mainly through Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) on immune cells, but also potentially through the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE; CIT), which may directly sensitize sensory neurons (CIT). This study uses co-injection of the RAGE antagonist Azeliragon to explore the role of RAGE in LPS-induced hyperalgesia. The TLR4 antagonist Resatorvid will also be tested by co-injection. Determining the involvement of these signalling pathways could guide the development of future therapeutic agents.
A prior exploratory pilot study (n = 12) mapped the time course and degree of pain hypersensitivity following LPS application using laser speckle imaging to measure hyperemia, a contact heat stimulus to study potential thermal hyperalgesia, tweezers to study potential mechanical hyperalgesia and intradermal acidic injections to study acid-induced pain. The current study builds on this to assess whether LPS-induced hyperalgesia is mediated, at least in part, through RAGE-dependent pathways. In addition, the involvement of transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 (TRPV1) in acid-induced pain will be investigated in the inflammation model, by co-injecting TRPV1 antagonist BCTC with the acidified solution. Previous research showed that injection of acidic fluid induces pain in non-inflamed skin, which is fully TRPV1-dependent (CIT), but it remains unclear whether this also applies to an inflamed condition.
Study objective and hypotheses The aim of this study is to elucidate the mechanisms of LPS-induced hyperalgesia, which leads to three independent research questions.
Research Question 1 (Main Research Question): The Role of RAGE in LPS-induced inflammation The mediation of immunogenic effects of LPS via TLR4 has long been established. The question remains whether parts of the proinflammatory effects of LPS are also mediated through an alternative RAGE-dependent signaling pathway, contributing to hyperalgesia. Antagonizing TLR4 serves as a reference. Blood flow provides an objective readout.
Primary Hypothesis: The degree of hyperemia is different in LPS-injected skin spots (3x) compared to LPS-injected skin spots where Azeliragon is co-injected (2x).
Secondary Hypothesis 1: Acid-induced pain is different in LPS-injected skin spots (1x) compared to LPS-injected skin spots where Azeliragon is co-injected (1x).
Secondary Hypothesis 2: Mechanically induced pain is different in LPS-injected skin spots (3x) compared to LPS-injected skin spots where Azeliragon is co-injected (2x).
In the respective comparison groups, the contribution of TLR4 is measured with the antagonist Resatorvid as a reference.
Research Question 2 (Exploratory): Sensitization in the LPS inflammation model This question concerns the pain induced by the injection of increasingly acidic (pH = 7.4 to 5.7) or neutral (pH = 7.4) solutions, differentiating between purely mechanical hyperalgesia and additional hyperalgesia due to acidosis.
The pilot study demonstrated that acid-induced pain in the skin after LPS injection is greater than after control injection. It also showed that mechanically induced pain on the skin after LPS injection is greater than after control injection. However, it remains unclear whether the difference between mechanically and acid-induced pain changes after LPS injection.
Hypothesis (Exploratory): The pain induced by acidosis in addition to mechanically induced pain (by injection into the skin) is greater after LPS injection than after control injection
. Research Question 3 (Exploratory): The Role of TRPV1 in acid-induced pain in the LPS inflammation model The question is whether the proportion of acid-induced pain attributable to TRPV1 activation is altered by LPS-induced inflammation.
Hypothesis (Exploratory): The inhibition of acid-induced pain by adding BCTC to the injection solution is greater after LPS injection than after control injection.
Study design This study is intended for non-therapeutic biomedical research on humans (basic research). It is designed as a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study. The study is performed at the Division of Special Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, AKH Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Methodology and experimental procedures First, for female participants, pregnancy is excluded by a pregnancy test. In case of a positive test, the participant is excluded and will be compensated for travelling. Before induction of skin inflammation by LPS injection, subjects will be familiarized with the subsequent pain stimuli (mechanical and acid) at two distinct native skin spots. The procedures are fully identical to the test stimulation for mechanical pain and acid-induced pain. The only difference is that it serves only for the subject to get to know the procedure. These stimulations will not be considered in the analysis. Thereafter, LPS ± substances are injected. After a period of 4.5 h, noxious stimuli as in the pilot study are applied. The procedure for determining mechanical hyperalgesia and acid-induced pain remains unchanged; two of the injection solutions will additionally contain BCTC.
Time point 1: Induction of skin inflammation resembling bacterial infection To trigger an inflammatory response resembling infection with gram-negative bacteria in the skin of human subjects, 5 ng of LPS dissolved in 50 µl of SIF, will be injected superficially into premarked skin spots of the volar forearm 4.5h before the application of noxious stimuli using a 30G syringe. The dose of 5 ng of LPS is based on literature (CIT), which was validated in pilot experiments. Each participant receives 10 injections, with 3 control injections and 7 injections containing LPS. In two LPS injections, the RAGE antagonist Azeliragon (100µM) is added, and in another two the TLR4 antagonist Resatorvid (10µM).
Time point 2: Quantification of skin perfusion The degree of hyperemia is quantified by using laser speckle imaging. It can be assumed that the inflamed skin area itself does not systematically vary between spots and subjects. In contrast to that, the distance at which the images are taken may vary between subjects. Therefore, a circular adhesive sticker of a diameter of 2 cm is placed in the center of both forearms as a reference. The subject is then asked not to move the forearm for a few seconds to acquire blood flow and a color image. The same procedure is repeated on the contralateral forearm.
Time point 2: Model of mechanical hyperalgesia Mechanical stimulation of the skin is realized by the use of self-closing cross-over tweezers. The tweezers are customized to have an maximal opening diameter of 6 mm, which fits the total area of erythema arising from the inflammation model used. For stimulation, the levers are opened by squeezing, gently put onto the test site, and closed by releasing. The self-closing property of the tweezers allows applying a standardized pinch to the skin, intensity of the perceived pain is rated by the subject thereafter. All pain ratings are provided on a scale 0-100, where 0 indicates not pain and 100 the maximal imaginable pain. The subjects are positioned and instructed not to look at the test site. For each spot the mechanical sensitivity is tested three times.
Time point 2: Model of acid-induced pain To expose human subjects to a defined nonhazardous intradermal acidic stimulus, the protocols of our two recent studies (continuous injection of constant pHs of 7.0, 6.5, 6.0 or 4.3, respectively) have been further developed to provide a linear decrease from a pH of 7.4 to a pH of 5.7. This is realized by two syringes connected via perfusor lines to a 3-way stopcock, where the solutions are being mixed before intradermal injection through a 30G cannula. The syringes contain SIF with a pH of 7.4 and 5.0, respectively. Over a period of 110 seconds, two programmable pumps stepwise adapt their infusion rates to generate a linear decrease from a pH of 7.4 to a pH of 5.7. The summarized total infusion rate is fixed at 30 ml/h throughout the protocol, which results in a total volume of 0.92 ml administered per injection. As in previous studies, pain is rated every five seconds on a numerical pain rating scale ranging from 0 to 100, whereas 0 represents no pain and 100 the maximum imaginable pain. Stimulation will alternatingly use both forearms. First, the cannula is intradermally inserted into the respective spot (inflamed or non-inflamed) on the volar forearm of the subject and further fixed with Leukoplast to prevent slipping of the stopcock. The infusion and the stopwatch are started simultaneously when no pain (= 0) is reported after cannula insertion. Pain is rated every five seconds until the subject reports no pain for a period of 30 consecutive seconds. A non-acidic stimulus is obtained by filling both syringes with solutions of a pH of 7.4.
Applied substances, dosage and administration Synthetic interstitial fluid (SIF) To closely mimic extracellular fluid, we previously used a synthetic interstitial fluid (SIF) (CIT). To reach a physiological buffer capacity, histidine (pKa=6.0) is added at 22.0 mM. This SIF variant allows for a stable pH in the range of 5.0 to 7.4 and contains the following (in mmol/l): NaCl 113.8, KCl 3.5, Na2HPO4 1.7, MgSO2×7H2O 0.7, sodium gluconate 9.6, glucose 5.0, sucrose 7.6, CaCl2×2H2O 1.5, Histidine 22.0. The calculated osmolarity is 300 mosmol/l. All fluids injected are diluted in SIF adjusted to a pH of 7.4. For the acid induced pain model, SIF is adjusted to a pH of 7.4 and 5.0, respectively.
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) Lipopolysaccharide (LPS; Molecular formula: C205H366N3O117P5; 4900 g/mol) is a major constituent of the cell wall of gram-negative bacteria. It is acquired from List Biological Laboratories as a highly purified molecule obtained from Escherichia coli O113, which has been shown to be safe in humans (CIT). Notably, List Biological Laboratories was commissioned by the NIH to manufacture GMP grade reference endotoxin (CIT). According to the corresponding author, the same source has been used for two of the above mentioned studies on intradermal LPS challenge (CITs). In this study, applying a dose of 5 ng per injection, 7 injections of LPS will result in a total dose of 35 ng, which is in the range of total doses used in previous intradermal trials and far below the total doses injected in intravenous trials (up to 300 ng). None of our preliminary experiments with repeated injections of LPS have indicated systemic adverse effects.
Resatorvid This TLR4 antagonist is co-injected with LPS at a dose of 2 x 0.18 µg = 0.36 µg. Resatorvid has undergone Phase III trials (daily doses of 1.2 or 2.4 mg/kg intravenously for 4 days, equivalent to daily doses of 84 or 168 mg for a person weighing 70 kg, tested on 92 or 93 study participants, NCT00143611). The daily total dose used in those trials exceeds the dose used here by nearly 500,000-fold. Results of the study have been published (CIT). The side effect of methemoglobinemia: "In the TAK-242 1.2 mg/kg/day group, mean levels increased from 0.9% at baseline to 2.8% at 2 hrs" appears to be of limited relevance for the 500,000-fold lower dose. Therefore, it is assumed that there will be no adverse effects. Biological activity of Resatorvid against LPS activity has been shown using human TLR4 and its co-receptors CD14 and MD2 expressed in HEK293 cells (CIT). The IC50 for LPS-induced NF-κB activation was found to be 110 nM. Assuming a dilution factor of about 10-fold upon intradermal injection and aiming for a receptor occupancy of at least 90%, using ~ 100-fold the IC50 was considered reasonable. Resatorvid (CAS 243984-11-4) is obtained from MedChemExpress, dissolved as 1 mM stock solution in DMSO and diluted to the final concentration of 10 µM, resulting in a solution containing 1% DMSO.
Azeliragon This RAGE antagonist is co-injected with LPS at a dose of 2 x 2.66 µg = 5.32 µg. Azeliragon has also undergone Phase III trials (daily dose of 5 mg orally for 18 months in ~440 study participants), where the daily total dose used exceeded the dose used here by nearly 1,000- fold (NCT02080364). It is also assumed here that there will be no adverse effects. Biological activity of 4 mg/kg intraperitoneal Azeliragon has been demonstrated by the reduction of LPS-induced airway inflammation (CIT). Binding of the prototypical RAGE agonist S100b is inhibited by Azeliragon with an IC50 of ~1 µM (International Publication Number WO2005000295). Assuming a dilution factor of about 10-fold upon intradermal injection and aiming for a receptor occupancy of at least 90%, using ~ 100-fold the IC50 was considered reasonable. Azeliragon (CAS 603148-36-3) is obtained from Targetmol, dissolved as 10 mM stock solution in DMSO and diluted to the final concentration of 100 µM, resulting in a solution containing 1% DMSO.
BCTC (N-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-4-(3-chloropyridin-2-yl)piperazine-1-carboxamide) This TRPV1 antagonist is administered at a total dose of 2 x 0.34 µg = 0.68 µg and added to the acidic solution. BCTC has been used in three previous studies at total doses of up to 3.36 µg per participant (CITs). No adverse effects were observed. The total dose of BCTC to be used here is approximately 20% of the previous maximal dose, so the risk of adverse effects is still considered very low. BCTC (CAS 393514-24-4) is obtained from Cayman Chemical and dissolved as 10 mM stock solution in DMSO. Solutions injected at timepoint 1 have a final DMSO concentration of 1%. Solutions containing final concentrations of Resatorvid, Azeliragon, BCTC and control were measured to have <0.01 Endotoxin Units/ml by a Limulustext according to the European Medicines Agency ICH Guideline Q4B. Passing through a 0.22 µm filter is used to obtain sterile solutions as a final step for all solutions.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: