Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Bright Research Partners | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the Arcevo LSA stent graft can safely and effectively treat patients that have an acute or chronic aortic dissection and/or aneurysm that involves the aortic arch and the descending thoracic aorta, with or without the involvement of the ascending aorta.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arcevo LSA | Experimental | The Primary study arm will consist of patients with an aortic aneurysm or chronic aortic dissection (n=117). The Secondary study arm will include patients with acute or subacute aortic dissections (n=15). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arcevoâ„¢ LSA Hybrid Stent Graft System | Device | The Arcevo LSA Hybrid Stent Graft System is an implantable aortic stent graft with LSA branch which is preloaded onto a delivery system and implanted during an open surgical procedure, or more specifically a total arch replacement procedure. The device is intended for use with a proximal surgical graft (not supplied). If additional coverage is needed, a protocol specified thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) device may be used. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Composite Rate of Patients Free From ≥1 Major Adverse Event | The major adverse events included in the composite are:
| 1 year post-index procedure of LSA stent graft implant |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of Mortality | All-cause, Cardiovascular-related, Aorta-related, Procedure-related, Device-related | Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure |
| Rate of Patients with ≥1 Additional Aortic Procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of Patients with Technical Success | Successful delivery and accurate placement of the device in the intended implantation site, as well as retrieval of the device delivery system, AND Patency of the device, including LSA, at conclusion of the procedure, AND No need for unanticipated or emergency surgery to correct a device malfunction or device-related complication | At exit from operating room |
General Inclusion Criteria
≥18 years of age or ≤80 years of age (male or female) at time of surgery
Patient has one of the following indications for open surgery based on computed tomography angiography (CTA) completed within 90 days of informed consent:
Patient, or patient's legally authorized representative (LAR; in the secondary arm only), provides written informed consent prior to any study procedures
Patient's surgery occurs within 90 days of informed consent
Anatomical Inclusion Criteria
Aortic diameter at the intended Arcevo™ LSA anastomosis site is ≥ 21 mm
For Aneurysm with distal sealing (i.e., single stage procedure), aortic diameter at the intended distal sealing zone is between 20-36 mm
For Dissection with distal sealing, aortic diameter at the intended distal sealing zone is between 22-40 mm
LSA branch does not require additional stenting further into the LSA (beyond the Arcevoâ„¢ LSA)
The intended LSA sealing zone has a diameter between 8.5 mm and 14.0 mm with a length of at least 10 mm
Absence of dissection, aneurysm, or stenosis in the intended LSA sealing zone
The intended LSA branch position does not interrupt flow to any branch vessel (e.g., left vertebral artery)
Patient does not have computed tomography (CT) evidence of extreme arch or LSA angulation precluding safe passage of the Arcevoâ„¢ LSA and delivery system
LSA take-off angle between 15° and 90°
For patients requiring planned extension, there is a ≥ 2 cm distal seal zone for the TEVAR device without a severely angulated descending aorta
For patients requiring planned extension, patient has suitable iliac artery anatomy for safe passage of the TEVAR delivery system
General Exclusion Criteria
Patient is pregnant, or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study; individuals of child-bearing potential must agree to use acceptable methods of contraception during the study
Patient has another medical condition (aside from the arch disease) that, in the opinion of the investigator, reduces the patient's life expectancy to < 2 years
Patient has an existing aortic stent graft device in the descending aorta that would interact with Arcevoâ„¢ LSA
Patient has a medical, social, or psychological problem that, in the opinion of the investigator, could impede the patient's ability to return for follow-up
Patient is unwilling or unable to comply with the follow-up schedule
Patient is institutionalized due to administrative or judicial order
Patient is unwilling to accept blood transfusion or blood product
Patient is currently participating in another interventional clinical study which includes treatment with another investigational product (e.g., device, pharmaceutical or biologic)
Medical Exclusion Criteria
Patient is unfit for open surgical repair involving circulatory arrest
Patient is in extreme hemodynamic compromise requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or substantial inotropic support prior to surgery
Patient has an active systemic infection
Patient has endocarditis or active infection of the aorta
Patient has a freely ruptured aorta
Patient has a history of a bleeding disorder (e.g., hemophilia)
Patient has current end-stage renal disease (e.g., GFR <30 mL/min)
Patient has a known allergy to Arcevoâ„¢ LSA components and TEVAR device components (if required) (nitinol, polyester, platinum-iridium, or polyethylene)
Patient has uncontrollable anaphylaxis to iodinated contrast or other inability to obtain CT angiograms during follow-up
Patient has acute coronary malperfusion
Patient has symptomatic visceral malperfusion
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erin M Adams, MSPH | Contact | 800-438-8285 | ARTIZEN@artivion.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Alabama | Recruiting | Birmingham | Alabama | 35205 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Primary Arm: chronic aortic dissection or aortic aneurysm. Secondary Arm: acute or subacute aortic dissection
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
All unplanned aortic procedures (endovascular, percutaneous, and open), Unanticipated aortic reoperations in the treated segment, Unanticipated device-related reoperations, Arcevo LSA explant
| Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure |
| Rate of Patients with ≥1 Device-Related Event | Device migration, Distal stent-induced new entry (d-SINE), Failed stent patency in the main body, Failed stent patency in the LSA, Stent-graft integrity issue compromising flow (i.e., stent fracture, narrowing, kink, or twist) | Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure |
| Rate of Patients with Major Adverse Events | New permanent paraplegia, New permanent paraparesis, New temporary paraplegia, New disabling stroke, New non-disabling stroke, New transient ischemic attack, Aortic rupture, Bowel ischemia, Hypersensitivity, Myocardial infarction, New onset renal failure requiring temporary dialysis, New onset renal failure requiring permanent dialysis, Pseudoaneurysm, Recurrent laryngeal or phrenic nerve injury, Respiratory failure (need for reintubation or ventilator dependence >48 hours), Severe heart failure requiring mechanical circulatory support, Thromboembolic adverse events | Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure |
| Rate of Patients with Radiographic Events (determined by Core Lab) | Anastomotic Leak between Arcevoâ„¢ LSA and surgical graft (i.e., Type Ia Endoleak or Distal anastomotic new entry [DANE]), Type Ic Endoleak (i.e. at the end of the LSA stent component), LSA occlusion, New LSA dissection, Maximal total aortic diameter growth >1 cm in the treated segment (Zones 2-4) compared to first post-operative CTA, Maximal total aortic diameter growth >1 cm at 1 cm beyond the distal end of Arcevoâ„¢ LSA, compared annually. Dissection Only: True lumen (TL) reduction compared to baseline > 5.0 mm at maximal total aortic diameter (Zones 2-4), False lumen (FL) growth compared to baseline > 5.0 mm at maximal total aortic diameter (Zones 2-4), FL thrombosis in the treated segment (LSA, Zones 2-4), FL thrombosis in the untreated segment (Zone 5). | Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure |
| Rate of Patients Requiring a Thoracic Extension Procedure who Experience Device-Extension Failure | Any failure of device-extension integrity (e.g., wear or tear in the fabric or wire breakage) resulting in a compromised seal and blood leakage or movement of the device | Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure |
| Rate of Patient Requiring a Thoracic Extension Procedure with Evidence of Type IIIa Endoleak | Type IIIa Endoleak | Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of index procedure |
| Rate of Patients Requiring Thoracic Extension Procedure with Failed Patency | Failed patency of the device-extension overlap | Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure |
| Rate of Patients Requiring Thoracic Extension Procedure with ≥1 Primary Major Adverse Events | All-cause mortality, new permanent disabling stroke, new permanent paraplegia and/or paraparesis, unanticipated aortic reoperation in the treated segment, LSA occlusion | 30 days post-extension procedure |
| Rate of Patients Requiring Thoracic Extension Procedure Requiring ≥1 Secondary Procedure Related to Extension | Secondary procedures related to the extension | 30 days post-extension procedure |
| Rate of Patients with Procedural Success | Technical success with the absence of the following: Death, Major adverse ischemic events, including the following: New disabling stroke, New paraplegia, New paraparesis, New device-related ischemia (i.e., not evident at time of index procedure), Distal procedure-related thromboembolic adverse event. General procedure-related complications: New onset renal failure requiring dialysis, Bowel or limb ischemia requiring surgery or intervention, Additional unplanned surgical or interventional procedures related to the device, since completion of the index procedure | At hospital discharge or at 30 days, whichever is longer at time of event |
| Rate of Patients with Treatment Success | Technical success with the absence of the following: Aorta-related mortality. Major adverse ischemic events, including the following: New disabling stroke, New permanent paraplegia, New permanent paraparesis, Increase in total aortic diameter > 1.0 cm between scheduled post-operative imaging (performed per schedule of activities) in the treated region of the aorta (Zones 2-4), Aortic rupture, Fistula formation (i.e., aortobronchial or aortoenteric), Device-related occlusion of the aortic arch (Zones 2-4), Loss of device integrity (e.g., stent fracture that could affect fixation or seal, graft fabric hole or tear, collapse), New Type Ic endoleak. | Follow-up at 30 days, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months of the index procedure |
| University of Southern California | Recruiting | Los Angeles | California | 90033 | United States |
|
| University of Colorado Hospital | Recruiting | Aurora | Colorado | 80045 | United States |
|
| MedStar Washington Health | Recruiting | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20010 | United States |
|
| University of Florida-Shands | Recruiting | Gainesville | Florida | 32608 | United States |
|
| Emory University School of Medicine | Recruiting | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
|
| Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine | Recruiting | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
|
| Johns Hopkins Hospital | Recruiting | Baltimore | Maryland | 21287 | United States |
|
| University of Michigan | Recruiting | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48109 | United States |
|
| Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital | Recruiting | New York | New York | 10032 | United States |
|
| Cornell Medical College (Presbyterian Weill) | Recruiting | New York | New York | 10065 | United States |
|
| Northwell Health | Recruiting | New York | New York | 10075 | United States |
|
| Montefiore Medical Center | Recruiting | The Bronx | New York | 10467 | United States |
|
| Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Recruiting | Cleveland | Ohio | 44195 | United States |
|
| Jefferson Health | Recruiting | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107 | United States |
|
| Allegheny General Hospital | Recruiting | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15212 | United States |
|
| University of Texas - Austin | Recruiting | Austin | Texas | 78705 | United States |
|
| University of Texas, McGovern Medical Center | Recruiting | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
|
| Baylor Scott & White | Recruiting | Plano | Texas | 75093 | United States |
|
| University of Washington / Harborview Medical Center | Recruiting | Seattle | Washington | 98105 | United States |
|
| Medical College of Wisconsin | Recruiting | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53226 | United States |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000094626 | Aneurysm, Aortic Arch |
| D000094629 | Dissection, Thoracic Aorta |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017545 | Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic |
| D001014 | Aortic Aneurysm |
| D000783 | Aneurysm |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D001018 | Aortic Diseases |
| D000784 | Aortic Dissection |
| D000094665 | Dissection, Blood Vessel |
| D000094683 | Acute Aortic Syndrome |
Not provided
Not provided