Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-005864-22 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| FWO Research Fund Flanders | UNKNOWN |
| Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven | OTHER |
| University Ghent | OTHER |
| University Hospital, Antwerp |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study investigates newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients following standard of care treatment. The primary endpoint of the study is to determine minimal residual disease (MRD) by combining 2 techniques in order to better predict progression free survival (PFS) of a patient. Secondary endpoint is to gain more insight into diagnostic features to better stratify patients based on risk factors for early relapse. Both endpoints could lead to a more patient specific treatment in the future.
Participants will be followed throughout their standard of care treatment. This treatment consists of indcution chemotherapy, followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Newly diagnosed Mulitple myeloma (NDMM) patients | Patients who recently received the diagnosis multiple myeloma and who will start a standard of care treatment consisting of induction chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), followed by maintenance therapy. If a patient has already started therapy, it is still possible to be included in the study if following conditions are met: whole body FDG PET/LDCT scan at diagnosis and obtaining at least a very good partial response (VGPR) before start of maintenance therapy. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Prognostic value of MRD assessment by FDG-PET combined with NGF in patiënts achieving VGPR or better after induction chemotherapy and ASCT | The investigators hypothesize that only patients who have no evidence of disease on both NGF and FDG-PET (MRD double negative) have a durable response with a 2y PFS of 90% compared to 50% in patients who have evidence of disease on at least one modality (MRD positive). PFS is defined as the time from achieving ≥ VGPR and confirmation of absence of MRD (landmark) to first documentation of objective progressive disease or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The <10^-5 MRD level is used to define BM-NGF MRD negativity. A Deauville score = 3 threshold will be used to define FDG-PET MRD negativity, but alternatives will also be evaluated (other DS, more quantitative measures like SUV). | From achieving VGPR and measuring MRD by FDG PET/CT and NGF until the patiënt received 2 years of maintenance therapy (or until detection of progressive disease or dead, whichever occurs first). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement of risk stratification at baseline - based on WES | The secondary endpoint is to implement WES and Radiomics at baseline to improve risk-stratification. Looking at WES-analysis: WES at baseline will be correlated with PFS duration, in order to explore wether certain WES signatures are correlated with shorter or longer PFS. | From diagnosis until progression, death or end of follow-up period (2years of maintenance therapy). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Eligibility criteria for the primary endpoint
Exclusion Criteria:
Any physical or physiological condition that may affect adherence to the study protocol, e.g. severe claustrophobia or the inability to lie still for 30 minutes.
uncontrolled diabetes
History of concomitant presence of any other malignancy, except for:
pregnant or breastfeeding
refusal or inability to provide written informed consent
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients will be included at participating centers: Universitair ziekenhuis Antwerpen, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge and UMC Amsterdam (the Netherlands).
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sofie De Rechter | Contact | 03 821 31 43 | sofie.derechter@uantwerpen.be |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universitair ziekenhuis Antwerpen | Recruiting | Antwerp | Antwerpen | 2650 | Belgium |
Not provided
| OTHER |
| Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc | OTHER |
| AZ Sint-Jan AV | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
At diagnosis (and in case of relapse): if possible an additional bone marrow aspirate sample will be taken during a routine investigation. This sample will be processed for whole exome sequencing (WES). This is a genetic test performed with the aim to gain more information on the genetic background of the disease. The samples will be completely used and will not be stored after end of study.
All the other samples taken are part of standard of care and hospital policy.
| Improvement of risk stratification at baseline - based on radiomics | The secondary endpoint is to implement WES and Radiomics at baseline to improve risk-stratification. Lookting at radiomics: PET radiomics will be perforemd and correlated with PFS duration. Is there a significant difference (higher/lower) between patients with a PFS of >24 months vs patients who show PD during maintenance therapy (PFS < 24 months). | From diagnosis until progression, death or end of follow-up period (2years of maintenance therapy). |
| Universitair ziekenhuis Gent | Recruiting | Ghent | Oost Vlaandere | 9000 | Belgium |
|
| Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven | Recruiting | Leuven | Vlaams-Brabant | 3000 | Belgium |
|
| AZ Sint-Jan Brugge | Recruiting | Bruges | West-Vlaandere | 8000 | Belgium |
|