Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a combined intervention of summer camp and letter-writing support works to improve psychological resilience in disadvantaged adolescents in Liangshan, Sichuan. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does the "summer camp + letter-writing" intervention improve resilience in adolescents who face poverty, lack of parental care, or social risks?
Does this intervention reduce depression and anxiety symptoms?
Researchers will compare adolescents who join the summer camp and receive monthly letters to those who do not receive this program to see if the intervention helps their mental health and coping skills.
Participants will:
Attend a 5-day summer camp that includes group games, emotion expression activities, life education, and learning support
Receive monthly letters from trained university student volunteers for about 10 months after the camp. The letters will encourage them, give advice, and help them practice what they learned in the camp
Complete surveys about their resilience, depression, and anxiety before the intervention, during it, at the end, and 6 months later
This study will also look at whether the program is cost-effective, meaning if it brings mental health benefits at a reasonable cost.
This study will test a new way to help disadvantaged adolescents build psychological resilience. Psychological resilience means having the strength to handle challenges and stress in life. Many adolescents in Liangshan, Sichuan, face poverty, lack of parental care, or social risks, which increase their chances of depression, anxiety, and social withdrawal.
Researchers designed a program with two parts:
Summer camp (first month)
Participants will attend a 5-day summer camp held at a local school. University student volunteers will lead activities such as:
Team-building games to build trust and cooperation
Emotional expression through art, music, and storytelling
Life education and future planning to raise hope and self-confidence
Learning support and academic guidance The camp will provide a safe and supportive environment where adolescents can build positive relationships and learn skills to cope with difficulties.
Letter-writing support (after the camp, for 10 months)
After the summer camp, each participant will be paired with a trained university student volunteer. The volunteer will write a letter to the participant each month. Letters will:
Encourage and support the participant emotionally
Remind them to use the skills learned during the camp
Share stories, advice, and caring words to reduce loneliness
Participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group, who will join the camp and receive letters, or the control group, who will continue their normal school life without this program. All participants will complete surveys before the program, halfway through, at the end, and 6 months later to measure:
Psychological resilience
Depression symptoms
Anxiety symptoms
The study will also check if this program is safe, acceptable to adolescents, and cost-effective. There are no known major risks. The program does not replace professional therapy but provides social and emotional support. If any participant shows signs of severe mental health issues, the research team will help them get professional care.
This study aims to find out if combining a short-term camp with long-term letter-writing support can sustainably improve adolescents' mental health in low-resource areas. If proven effective, it may offer a scalable and low-cost way to support disadvantaged youth in rural China.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | A two-phase intervention consisting of (1) a 5-day resilience training summer camp and (2) 10-month letter-writing support by university student volunteers. |
|
| Control Group | No Intervention | Participants will not receive the full intervention but will be offered a condensed version after the study ends for ethical consideration. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined Resilience Intervention | Behavioral | A two-phase behavioral intervention aimed at improving psychological resilience among socioeconomically disadvantaged adolescents. The intervention includes:
The intervention is designed to be low-cost, scalable, and ethically safe, and has been standardized through manuals and training protocols. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Psychological resilience (RSCA score) at post-intervention | Psychological resilience will be assessed using the Resilience Scale for Chinese Adolescents (RSCA), a 27-item validated instrument measuring five dimensions of resilience. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, and the total score ranges from 27 to 135, with higher scores indicating greater resilience. | At baseline (1 month before intervention), mid-intervention (Month 6), end of intervention (Month 11), and follow-up (Month 17) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in depressive symptoms from baseline to follow-up (PHQ-9) | Depressive symptoms will be measured using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a validated screening tool for depressive symptoms. Each item is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), with a total score range of 0-27. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. Clinically significant depression is defined as a score ≥10. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in life satisfaction from baseline to follow-up | Life satisfaction will be assessed using a brief validated adolescent life satisfaction scale. Participants rate their overall satisfaction with life on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater life satisfaction. | At baseline (1 month before intervention), end of intervention (Month 11), and follow-up (Month 17) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| xiaoxuan Liu, MA | Contact | +8613305630831 | xiaoxuanliu@zju.edu.cn | |
| Xudong Zhou, PhD | Contact | +8618158101668 | zhouxudong@zju.edu.cn |
Not provided
Not provided
This study involves vulnerable child participants, and individual-level data will not be shared due to ethical and privacy concerns. Only aggregate-level results will be made available in publications or upon request.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| At baseline (1 month before intervention), mid-intervention (Month 6), end of intervention (Month 11), and follow-up (Month 17) |
| Change in anxiety symptoms from baseline to follow-up (GAD-7) | Anxiety symptoms will be assessed using the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), a validated self-report measure for generalized anxiety. Each item is rated from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), with total scores ranging from 0 to 21. A score of ≥10 is considered clinically significant. | At baseline (1 month before intervention), mid-intervention (Month 6), end of intervention (Month 11), and follow-up (Month 17) |
| Change in mobile device addiction symptoms from baseline to follow-up (SAS-SV) | Digital device addiction will be assessed using the Short Version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS-SV), adapted for general mobile device use. The scale includes 10 items rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 6 = strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater risk of device addiction. A total score above 32 is considered indicative of problematic use. | Baseline (T0): 1 month before summer camp Post-intervention (T2): Month 11 Follow-up (T3): Month 17 |
| Change in future orientation from baseline to follow-up | Participants' future orientation will be assessed using a brief validated scale measuring goal-setting, planning, and optimism toward future outcomes. Higher scores reflect stronger future orientation. | At baseline (1 month before intervention), end of intervention (Month 11), and follow-up (Month 17) |