Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a prospective, open-label, single-arm, single-center clinical investigation designed to evaluate the safety and performance of a Novel Venous Cannula during on-pump cardiac surgery requiring transfemoral venous cannulation. The investigation aims to assess the pressure drop across the cannula during extracorporeal circulation and the incidence of serious adverse events associated with its use. A total of 42 participants will be enrolled.
This clinical investigation evaluates a Novel Venous Cannula intended for drainage of venous blood during extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery. The cannula is made of polyurethane and includes a flexible metallic mesh that allows it to collapse during insertion and expand in situ. It is designed for single use, sterile, and is introduced using a dedicated insertion kit.
The study is a non-randomized, open-label, monocentric, single-arm investigation involving 42 adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery requiring transfemoral venous cannulation. The investigation includes three visits: a screening visit (from Day -7 to Day -1), the procedure day (Day 0), and a follow-up visit at Day 7 ± 3 days.
The primary effectiveness outcome is the mean pressure drop (mm Hg) across the cannula required to maintain the target flow rate during surgery. The primary safety outcome is the number of serious adverse events (SAEs) related to the use of the investigational device.
Secondary outcomes include several efficacy-related parameters (e.g., venous line flow, pump flow, cannula positioning, volume of infusion, cardioplegic solution usage, and others), as well as safety outcomes including mortality, cardiovascular events, and neurological complications at 7 days post-procedure.
There is no control group in this study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Arm - Novel Self-expanding Venous Cannula | Experimental | Participants in this arm will undergo transfemoral venous cannulation using the Novel Self-expanding Venous Cannula during on-pump cardiac surgery procedures. The investigational device is a single-use, sterile polyurethane cannula reinforced with a flexible metallic mesh that allows self-expansion once deployed into the vessel. The device is intended to facilitate efficient venous drainage as part of the extracorporeal circulation system. The study aims to evaluate the device's performance in terms of pressure drop and safety profile. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-expanding Venous Cannula | Device | The intervention consists of a self-expanding venous drainage cannula made of polyurethane and reinforced with a flexible metallic mesh. It is designed for transfemoral insertion during on-pump cardiac surgery, including minimally invasive procedures. Once positioned, the cannula expands to its functional diameter to facilitate efficient blood drainage into the extracorporeal circulation system. The configuration used in this study is 680/730 mm in length, 24 Fr, 3/8" diameter. The device is sterile, single-use, and is inserted once on the day of surgery (Day 0) and removed at the end of the procedure. The cannula is used continuously during cardiopulmonary bypass for a maximum duration of 6 hours and is not reused. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Effectiveness: the mean pressure drop (mm Hg) to maintain the desired flow rate (L/min) during the standard surgical procedure | Measurement of the mean pressure drop (in millimeters of mercury, mmHg) across the novel venous cannula required to maintain the target blood flow rate (liters per minute) during cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery patients. | During the surgical procedure (Day 0) |
| Safety: the number of SAE with the Novel Venous Cannula during the standard surgical procedure | Number of serious adverse events (SAEs) occurring during the surgical procedure that are related or possibly related to the use of the novel venous cannula, including device-related complications, cardiovascular events, and other procedure-associated serious adverse events. | From Day 0 (procedure day) to 7 days post-procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Venous Line Flow During Extracorporeal Circulation Unit of Measure: mL/min | Measurement of venous line flow during CPB to assess the drainage efficiency of the novel venous cannula. | During the surgical procedure (Day 0) |
| Mean pump flow during extracorporeal circulation Unit of Measure: L/min/m² |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Cecilia Hospital | Cotignola | RA | 48033 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Von Segesser. Venous drainage is key for CPB. The royal Society of Medicine, London. 28th November 2008 | ||
| 18635371 | Background | von Segesser LK, Ferrari E, Delay D, Maunz O, Horisberger J, Tozzi P. Routine use of self-expanding venous cannulas for cardiopulmonary bypass: benefits and pitfalls in 100 consecutive cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Sep;34(3):635-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.05.037. Epub 2008 Jul 16. | |
| 36314445 |
Not provided
Not provided
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) may be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request to the Sponsor, after study completion and publication of the primary results. Each request will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis in accordance with applicable data protection laws, including the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 2016/679, and ethical considerations. Access will be granted through a controlled process to ensure the protection of participant confidentiality.
IPD and supporting information will be available starting 6 months after publication of the primary study results, and will remain accessible for 5 years thereafter.
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) and supporting documents (such as study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and clinical study report) will be available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request.
Requestors must submit a research proposal describing the intended use of the data. Access will be granted after approval by the Sponsor to ensure compliance with ethical standards and data protection regulations, including GDPR.
Data will be shared through a secure data-sharing platform or via encrypted transfer under a data use agreement that protects participant confidentiality and limits use to the approved research purposes.
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2026 |
Open-label, non-randomized, monocentric, one arm clinical investigation with pre-marked medical device
Not provided
Not provided
Open-label
Not provided
|
Mean Pump Flow Indexed to Body Surface Area During CPB |
| During the surgical procedure (Day 0) |
| Number of cannulae in the surgical field during surgical procedure Unit of Measure: Count (number) | Number of Cannulae Positioned in the Surgical Field | During the surgical procedure (Day 0) |
| Number of cannula tip displacement as detected by TTE/TEE during surgical procedure Unit of Measure: n (%) | Number of Cannula Tip Displacements Detected by TTE/TEE | During the surgical procedure (Day 0) |
| Mean increase in free Hb measure during surgical procedure Unit of Measure: mg/dL | Mean Increase in Free Hemoglobin Levels | During the surgical procedure (Day 0) |
| Mean volume of infusion during surgical procedure Unit of Measure: mL | Mean Volume of Infusion Administered | During the surgical procedure (Day 0) |
| Mean volume of cardioplegic solution Unit of Measure: mL | Mean Volume of Cardioplegic Solution Administered | During the surgical procedure (Day 0) |
| Mean speed of aspirators during surgical procedure Unit of Measure: mL/min | Mean Speed of Aspirators Used | During the surgical procedure (Day 0) |
| Mean percentage of pump flow increase due to the patient's metabolic needs Unit of Measure: % | Mean Percentage Increase in Pump Flow Due to Metabolic Needs | During the surgical procedure (Day 0) |
| Mean volume of recovery blood re-administered during surgical procedure Unit of Measure: mL | Mean Volume of Recovery Blood Re-Administered | During the surgical procedure (Day 0) |
| Number of patients for whom blood concentrator was used Unit of Measure: Count (number of patients) | Number of Patients for Whom a Blood Concentrator Was Used | During the surgical procedure (Day 0) |
| Presence of echocardiographic abnormalities Unit of Measure: n (%) | Presence of echocardiographic abnormalities | During the surgical procedure (Day 0) |
| Number of correctly delivery and deployed Novel Venous Cannula Unit of Measure: Count (number of cannulae) | Number of Novel Venous Cannulae Correctly Delivered and Deployed | During the surgical procedure (Day 0) |
| Number of technical success without procedural SAE Unit of Measure: n (%) | Number of patients in which the device was used successfully without the occurrence of procedural serious adverse events during the procedure. | During the surgical procedure (Day 0) |
| Number of deaths at 7 days after procedure Unit of Measure: Count (number of patients) | Number of patients who die within 7 days following the surgical procedure involving the use of the novel venous cannula. | From Day 0 (procedure day) to 7 days post-procedure |
| Number of cardiovascular deaths at 7 days after procedure Unit of Measure: Count (number of patients) | Number of patients who experience cardiovascular-related death within 7 days following the surgical procedure. | From Day 0 (procedure day) to 7 days post-procedure |
| Number of cardiovascular SAEs at 7 days after procedure Unit of Measure: Count (number of patients) | Number of cardiovascular-related serious adverse events (SAEs) occurring within 7 days after the procedure. | From Day 0 (procedure day) to 7 days post-procedure |
| Number of stroke at 7 days after procedure Unit of Measure: Count (number of patients) | Number of patients experiencing a clinically confirmed stroke within 7 days following the procedure. | From Day 0 (procedure day) to 7 days post-procedure |
| Number minor neurological disorder at 7 days after procedure Unit of Measure: Count (number of patients) | Number of patients experiencing minor neurological disorders within 7 days following the procedure. | From Day 0 (procedure day) to 7 days post-procedure |
| Background |
| Van Praet KM, Kofler M, Meyer A, Sundermann SH, Hommel M, Falk V, Kempfert J. Single-Center Experience With a Self-Expandable Venous Cannula During Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery. Innovations (Phila). 2022 Nov-Dec;17(6):491-498. doi: 10.1177/15569845221131534. Epub 2022 Oct 30. |
| 19487602 | Background | Stoney WS. Evolution of cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation. 2009 Jun 2;119(21):2844-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.830174. No abstract available. |
| Background | Savini C, Gliozzi G, Martin-Suarez S, Zardin D, Mariani C, Cavalli GG, Folesani G, Pacini D. Femoral Venous Cannulation for Minimally Invasive Surgery: Three Years Experience with Wall-less, Self-expandable Cannula. The International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery 2021, PC110. |
| 25575788 | Background | Pinon M, Pradas G, Molina D, Legarra JJ. Use of self-expanding venous cannula in tricuspid reoperation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Sep;48(3):499-501. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu492. Epub 2015 Jan 9. |
| 17669950 | Background | Mueller XM, Mallabiabrena I, Mucciolo G, von Segesser LK. Optimized venous return with a self-expanding cannula: from computational fluid dynamics to clinical application. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2002 Sep;1(1):23-7. doi: 10.1016/s1569-9293(02)00006-3. |
| 31576402 | Background | Puis L, Milojevic M, Boer C, De Somer FMJJ, Gudbjartsson T, van den Goor J, Jones TJ, Lomivorotov V, Merkle F, Ranucci M, Kunst G, Wahba A; EACTS/EACTA/EBCP Committee Reviewers. 2019 EACTS/EACTA/EBCP guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Feb 1;30(2):161-202. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz251. No abstract available. |
| 16476552 | Background | Jegger D, Chassot PG, Bernath MA, Horisberger J, Gersbach P, Tozzi P, Delay D, von Segesser LK. A novel technique using echocardiography to evaluate venous cannula performance perioperatively in CPB cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Apr;29(4):525-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.12.050. Epub 2006 Feb 14. |
| 15209858 | Background | Jegger D, Horisberger J, Boone Y, Seigneuil I, Jachertz M, Holzmann I, von Segesser LK. Vascular access for cardiopulmonary bypass procedures. Artif Organs. 2004 Jul;28(7):649-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2004.07372.x. |
| 12705652 | Background | Jegger D, Corno AF, Mucciolo A, Mucciolo G, Boone Y, Horisberger J, Seigneul I, Jachertz M, von Segesser LK. A prototype paediatric venous cannula with shape change in situ. Perfusion. 2003 Mar;18(1):61-5. doi: 10.1191/0267659103pf640oa. |
| 29489210 | Background | Ismail A, Semien G, Sharma S, Collier SA, Miskolczi SY. Cardiopulmonary Bypass. 2024 Aug 12. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482190/ |
| Background | Gravlee GP, Davis RF, Kurusz M, Utley JR. Cardiopulmonary Bypass. 2nd Edition. Eugene A, Hessel II, Aaron G. Hill. Chapter 5: circuitry and cannulation - 2016 |
| Background | Frederick A, Hensley Jr, Martin DE, Gravlee G. A Practical Approach to Cardiac Anesthesia. 3rd Edition. 2011; Larach DR, Gibbs NM. Chapter 7. Anesthetic Management During Cardiopulmonary Bypass |
| 24728884 | Background | Hessel EA 2nd. A Brief History of Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014 Jun;18(2):87-100. doi: 10.1177/1089253214530045. Epub 2014 Apr 10. |
| 37512033 | Background | Ceresa F, Mammana LF, Leonardi A, Palermo A, Patane F. Virtually Wall-Less versus Standard Thin-Wall Venous Cannula in the Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: Single-Center Experience. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jun 29;59(7):1221. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071221. |
| 29677020 | Background | Ferrari E, von Segesser LK, Berdajs D, Muller L, Halbe M, Maisano F. Clinical Experience in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery With Virtually Wall-Less Venous Cannulas. Innovations (Phila). 2018 Mar/Apr;13(2):104-107. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000478. |
| 18666745 | Background | Abdel-Sayed S, Favre J, Horisberger J, Taub S, Hayoz D, von Segesser LK. New bench test for venous cannula performance assessment. Perfusion. 2007 Nov;22(6):411-6. doi: 10.1177/0267659108089759. |