Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This research study is evaluating two different methods of cochlear implant (CI) insertion - robotic-assisted insertion and manual insertion - to better understand how they affect hearing outcomes. Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to receive their cochlear implant using one of these two techniques. Both methods are performed in a standard operating room by qualified surgeons, and both are considered safe and approved for use.
The main goal is to compare how well participants hear one year after surgery based on the insertion method used. The study will also look at things like surgical time, inner ear health, and how the hearing nerve responds. All participants will receive the same type of cochlear implant device and follow-up care.
This study may help guide future surgical techniques and improve outcomes for individuals receiving cochlear implants.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Insertion | Experimental | Surgical technique using robotic assistance (IotaSoft system) to perform the cochlear implant electrode array insertion into the cochlea. |
|
| Manual Cochlear Implant Insertion | Active Comparator | Standard surgical technique for inserting the cochlear implant electrode array without robotic assistance. This represents the standard of care method. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IotaSoft Robotic Insertion System | Device | The IotaSoft robotic insertion device is an FDA-approved tool designed to provide precise and controlled insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array to minimize trauma during implantation. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Low-Frequency Pure Tone Average (LFPTA) | Change in unaided pure tone thresholds at 125, 250, and 500 Hz from baseline to 12 months post-activation. The average of these frequencies will be computed for each participant. | Baseline (pre-op) to 12 months post-activation |
| Speech Recognition Using CNC Word Test | Participants' ability to recognize individual spoken words will be assessed using the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word test in both quiet and noise conditions. Outcome is based on the percent of key words correctly repeated. | 3, 6, and 12 months post-activation |
| Speech Recognition Using AzBio Sentence Test | Participants' ability to recognize spoken sentences will be assessed using the AzBio sentence test in quiet and noise. Outcome is based on the percent of key words correctly repeated in standardized sentence lists. | 3, 6, and 12 months post-activation |
| Degree of Low-Frequency Hearing Preservation | Subjects will be categorized based on change in LFPTA into:
| Baseline to 12 months post-activation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Impedance Measurements | To assess device function and consistency over time by measuring electrical impedance (in kilo-ohms, kΩ) of cochlear implant electrodes following either robotic or manual insertion. Impedance will be recorded at activation. Lower and more stable impedance values are expected to indicate better electrode-tissue interface and improved device function. The hypothesis is that robotic cochlear implantation will result in lower and more consistent impedance values compared to manual insertion. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petronio Senior Clinical Research Operations Manager, MHA | Contact | 407-303-5503 | Petronio.martins@adventhealth.com | |
| Bridget Clinical Research Operations Manager, MS, MPH | Contact | 407-303-5503 | Bridget.Miller@adventhealth.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AdventHealth Celebration | Kissimmee | Florida | 34747 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33902040 | Background | Barriat S, Peigneux N, Duran U, Camby S, Lefebvre PP. The Use of a Robot to Insert an Electrode Array of Cochlear Implants in the Cochlea: A Feasibility Study and Preliminary Results. Audiol Neurootol. 2021;26(5):361-367. doi: 10.1159/000513509. Epub 2021 Apr 26. | |
| 39182488 | Background | Gersdorff G, Peigneux N, Duran U, Camby S, Lefebvre PP. Impedance and Functional Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted or Manual Cochlear Implantation: A Comparative Study. Audiol Neurootol. 2025;30(1):80-88. doi: 10.1159/000540577. Epub 2024 Aug 23. |
Not provided
Not provided
We will not be sharing information from this study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Manual Cochlear Implant Insertion | Procedure | Standard surgical technique for manually inserting the cochlear implant electrode array. This method reflects the current standard of care without the assistance of robotic tools. |
|
| CI activation (6-8 weeks post-op) |
| 37043021 | Background | Heuninck E, Van de Heyning P, Van Rompaey V, Mertens G, Topsakal V. Audiological outcomes of robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Oct;280(10):4433-4444. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07961-7. Epub 2023 Apr 12. |
| 37892718 | Background | Maheo C, Marie A, Torres R, Archutick J, Leclere JC, Marianowski R. Robot-Assisted and Manual Cochlear Implantation: An Intra-Individual Study of Speech Recognition. J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 17;12(20):6580. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206580. |
| 28145157 | Background | Caversaccio M, Gavaghan K, Wimmer W, Williamson T, Anso J, Mantokoudis G, Gerber N, Rathgeb C, Feldmann A, Wagner F, Scheidegger O, Kompis M, Weisstanner C, Zoka-Assadi M, Roesler K, Anschuetz L, Huth M, Weber S. Robotic cochlear implantation: surgical procedure and first clinical experience. Acta Otolaryngol. 2017 Apr;137(4):447-454. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2017.1278573. Epub 2017 Feb 1. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006319 | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural |
| D006312 | Hearing Loss, Bilateral |
| D006311 | Hearing Disorders |
| D003638 | Deafness |
| D015837 | Vestibular Diseases |
| D034381 | Hearing Loss |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004427 | Ear Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
| D012678 | Sensation Disorders |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D007759 | Labyrinth Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided