Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This clinical study aims to evaluate and compare the long-term clinical performance of direct and indirect restorations in Class I cavities of molar teeth over a 10-year period. A total of 54 restorations (27 direct and 27 indirect) were placed in 27 patients, with each patient receiving one direct and one indirect restoration. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, and at 1-, 2-, and 10-year follow-ups using modified USPHS criteria.
This prospective clinical study was designed to evaluate and compare the long-term clinical performance of direct and indirect composite restorations in Class I cavities of permanent molar teeth over a 10-year period.
A total of 27 patients were enrolled in the study. Each participant received one direct and one indirect restoration, resulting in a total of 54 restorations (27 direct and 27 indirect).
Direct restorations were performed intraorally using a microhybrid composite and adhesive system in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Indirect restorations were fabricated in the laboratory using a reinforced microfill composite system and cemented using resin cement.
All restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline, and at 1-, 2-, and 10-year follow-up appointments. The modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were used for evaluation. The assessed parameters included surface texture, anatomic form, color match, marginal adaptation, cavosurface marginal discoloration, and the presence of caries.
The aim of this study is to provide evidence-based clinical data regarding the durability and performance of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct and Indirect Restorations | Experimental | Participants in this arm received two different types of restorations in Class I cavities of molar teeth: one direct restoration using a microhybrid universal composite, and one indirect restoration using a reinforced microfill composite system. Each patient received one of each restoration type on different molar teeth. Clinical evaluations were conducted at baseline, 1 year, 2 years, and 10 years using modified USPHS criteria. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Restoration with Microhybrid Composite | Device | Direct Class I restorations were placed in molar teeth using a microhybrid universal composite (Aelite All-Purpose Body, Bisco) and an adhesive system according to the manufacturer's instructions. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 10-Year Clinical Success Rate of Direct and Indirect Restorations | The primary outcome is the clinical success rate of direct and indirect Class I restorations in molar teeth after 10 years. Success and failure were assessed using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. A restoration was considered a failure if it required replacement due to secondary caries or other clinical complications. | 10 years |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Neslihan Tekçe | Kocaeli University, Faculty of Dentistry | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40999454 | Derived | Tekce N, Demirci M, Tuncer S, Oghan Turkoglu M, Turgut V, Balci SN, Yersel G. Clinical evaluation of direct and indirect restorations in class I cavities: a 10-year follow-up study. BMC Oral Health. 2025 Sep 25;25(1):1430. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06775-9. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003731 | Dental Caries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017001 | Tooth Demineralization |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Indirect Restoration with Reinforced Microfill Composite | Device | Indirect Class I restorations were fabricated using a reinforced microfill composite system (Tescera Indirect Composite System Body, Bisco) in the laboratory and cemented into molar teeth using resin cement. |
|