Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
the aim of the study is to evaluate the changes in gingival recession depth reduction following, treatment of multiple RT2 recession with tunnel coronal advanced flap in comparison to coronal advanced flap, both combined with connective tissue graft
Several techniques for gingival recession defects have been developed for treatment such as are pedicle soft-tissue graft (rotational flap procedures, advanced flap procedure and tunneling), free soft-tissue graft (epithelialized and subepithelial connective tissue graft) and regenerative procedures (barrier membrane or biologic mediators.
The coronally advanced flap and the tunneling technique are the most commonly performed surgical approaches for treating gingival recessions. Barootchi et al. 2024 conducted a clinical study using tunnel coronal advanced flap technique(TCAF) for treating multiple RT2 gingival recession defects ,in order to combine the advantage of both better access and graft stabilization in CAF and the preservation of the integrity of the papilla and better blood supply to the graft present in tunneling technique. From the previous study it was concluded that the combination of both techniques in the same surgical design can improve both the flap and graft vascularization and enhance clinical, esthetic, and patient-reported outcomes. To our knowledge, there is no conducted randomized clinical trials comparing the tunneled coronally advanced flap technique to the coronally advanced flap for gingival depth reduction in multiple RT2 recessions.
So, this clinical trial aims to address this gap of the literature.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| CORONAL ADVANCED FLAP WITH CONNECTIVE TISSUE GRAFT | Active Comparator | The surgical papillae will be elevated using split thickness manner while maintaining the blade in a nearly parallel position to the root.
The connective tissue graft, is harvested from the hard palate (donor site) then it will be sutured in the surgical recipient site then covered by the coronal advancement of the flap and suturing it. |
|
| Tunnel coronal advanced flap with connective tissue graft | Experimental | only one surgical papilla will be elevated. The papilla chosen for incision must be with the least interproximal attachment loss. A slightly divergent vertical incision extending beyond the mucogingival junction then a horizontal incision at a distance equal to the recession depth plus 1 mm apical to the papilla tip. The other papillae integrity is preserved , and will be detached using tunneling miniblades and papilla elevator. The flap will be tunneled till the planned papilla .Connective tissue graft will be harvested the graft will be inserted underneath the flap and tunneled below the non-incised papillae. The TCAF is coronally advanced and stabilized 2 mm above the CEJ with sling and simple interrupted sutures at the level of the papillae and simple interrupted sutures for the vertical incision Further coronal advancement of the tunneled papilla with a suspended suture around the with a composite stop |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCAF | Procedure | tunnel coronal advanced flap |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Gingival recession depth reduction (GRD) | ONE YEAR |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of mean root coverage (MRC %) | one year | |
| Percentage of complete root coverage (CRC%) | one year | |
| Gingival Recession width |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May Mohamed Kamal | Contact | 01063392983 | may.kamal@dentistry.cu.edu.eg |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005889 | Gingival Recession |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005882 | Gingival Diseases |
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| one year |
| Keratinized tissue width (KTW) | one year |
| Probing pocket depth | one year |
| Root coverage esthetic score | 10 is the ideal esthetic score Zero points will be assigned if the final position of the gingival margin is equal or apical to the previous recession depth (failure of root coverage procedure), irrespective of color, the presence of a scar, MTC, or MGJ. Zero points will also be assigned when a partial or total loss of interproximal papilla (black triangle) occurred following the treatment | one year |
| Volumetric soft tissue changes | one year |
| Post-operative pain | Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with numerical scale from 0 to 10 ('no pain' to 'worst pain imaginable') measured daily for the first 2 weeks postoperatively | 2 Week post-operative |
| Post-operative patient satisfaction | A 3-item questionnaire will be given to the patients to be answered using a 7-point answer scale for assessing their satisfaction with the whole surgical procedure and the achieved results of the procedure performed. | one year |
| D055093 |
| Periodontal Atrophy |