Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this randomized controlled trial was to determine whether stoma-care training using standardized patients, as compared with low-fidelity mannequins, improved meaningful learning self-awareness, perceived learning, and practical stoma-care skill levels in oncology nurses at a 600-bed tertiary oncology education and research hospital in Ankara, Turkey. The main questions it aimed to answer were:
Did standardized-patient simulation produce greater gains in meaningful learning self-awareness?
Did it yield higher perceived learning scores?
Did it result in larger improvements in stoma-care skill levels?
Researchers compared Group M (standardized patient) to Group K (low-fidelity mannequin) to evaluate which method more effectively enhanced nurses' cognitive and technical outcomes.
Participants completed a 10-item demographic and background survey, answered pre-training assessments on all three scales, attended a two-hour didactic session on stoma fundamentals and evidence-based care, received two hours of hands-on practice with their assigned modality, and completed immediate post-training assessments using the same instruments.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm (Group M) | Experimental | Participants in Group M (45 enrolled; 43 analyzed) completed baseline assessments of meaningful learning self-awareness, perceived learning, stoma-care skills, and demographics. They attended a two-hour didactic session on stoma indications, perioperative care, and evidence-based practices. Immediately after, each nurse engaged in a two-hour standardized-patient simulation using realistic stoma moulage. Simulations followed INACSL standards, including a 15-minute pre-briefing, ~20-minute individual in-scenario practice with cueing, peer observation, and a 15-20-minute PEARLS debriefing. All outcome measures were repeated immediately post-training to evaluate short-term cognitive and technical gains. |
|
| Control Arm (Group K) | Experimental | Group K participants (n = 45 enrolled; 44 analyzed) completed baseline assessments of meaningful learning self-awareness, perceived learning, stoma-care skills, and demographics, and attended the same two-hour didactic session as Group M. They then performed a two-hour stoma-care simulation in small groups on a low-fidelity Prestan 2000 CPR mannequin fitted with a play-dough stoma model. Sessions followed INACSL structure: a brief pre-briefing of objectives and materials; individual mannequin practice with cueing; peer observation in an adjacent area; and a PEARLS-guided debriefing. Outcome measures were repeated immediately post-training to assess short-term cognitive and technical performance. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| standardized-patient simulation | Other | Intervention Arm (Group M) Participants randomized to Group M (n = 45 enrolled; 43 analyzed) first completed baseline assessments of meaningful learning self-awareness , perceived learning, and stoma-care skill , as well as a 10-item demographic survey. They then attended a two-hour didactic session-covering stoma indications, types, perioperative care, evidence-based practices, complications, and the stoma-care nurse's role-delivered by a certified stoma-care nurse in small groups. Immediately following the lecture, each nurse participated in a two-hour hands-on simulation with a trained standardized patient. The standardized patient had been prepared with a realistic stoma moulage (transparent drape and egg-biscuit mixture) and received two hours of role-training. Simulation sessions adhered to INACSL Standards ("pre-briefing," "in-scenario," "observation," and "debrief |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| practical stoma-care competence |
Description: Change in total scores on the 23-item Stoma Care Skill Rubric, based on direct observation before and immediately after training during simulated stoma-care performance. Higher post-training scores indicate improved technical competence in ostomy care. | At baseline and immediately after training |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Merve Beke, MsC | Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital | Ankara | Ankara | 06560 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this randomized, parallel-group, assessor-blinded interventional trial was to determine whether stoma-care training using standardized patients, as compared with low-fidelity mannequins, produced superior gains in meaningful learning self-awareness, perceived learning, and practical stoma-care skill levels among oncology nurses at a 600-bed tertiary oncology education and research hospital in Ankara, Turkey.
Key features of the interventional study model included:
Design: Two-arm, parallel assignment, assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Randomization: Ninety nurses were allocated 1:1 to Group M (standardized patient) or Group K (low-fidelity mannequin) using simple block randomization with allocation concealment via sealed envelopes matched to a password-protected Excel list.
Sample size and flow: Based on G*Power analysis (effect size = 0.6, α = 0.05, β = 0.20), a minimum of 42 nurses per group was required; 45 were enrolled in each arm. After excluding those
Not provided
Not provided
In this trial, the educators who delivered the interventions, the research staff who collected the data, and the investigators who performed the analyses were all aware of participants' group assignments. Only the independent outcome assessor remained blinded to group allocation.
|
| a low-fidelity Prestan 2000 adult CPR mannequin modified with a play-dough stoma model | Other | Control Arm (Group K) Participants randomized to Group K (n = 45 enrolled; 44 analyzed) underwent the identical sequence of baseline assessments and the same two-hour didactic session as Group M. For the practical component, they performed stoma-care simulation on a low-fidelity Prestan 2000 adult CPR mannequin modified with a play-dough stoma model. Hands-on practice was structured in small groups over two hours and included: Pre-briefing: Overview of objectives and materials. In-scenario: Individual stoma-care performance on the mannequin, guided by the certified stoma-care nurse with cueing as needed. Observation: Peers observed from a separate area with scenario summaries. Debriefing: Reflection and feedback using the PEARLS framework to consolidate learning and discuss transfer to clinical practice. Immediate post-training assessments using the same three scales captured outcomes in meaningful learning self-awareness, perceived learning, and stoma-care skill level. |
|