Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two procedural approaches to managing atrial fibrillation. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Is AF ablation or pacemaker implant and AV nodal ablation a more effective treatment approach for patients with atrial fibrillation refractory to pharmacological treatment?
What effect do these differing treatment approaches have on patient's quality of life and mental health?
Participants will:
Be randomly allocated to one of the treatment approaches. Visit the clinic 2 months, 12 months and 24 months after their procedure for a checkup, questionnaires and repeat heart ultrasounds.
The goal of this trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of pulmonary vein isolation compared with pacemaker implant and atrioventricular nodal ablation for patients with atrial fibrillation.
Patients who have been refractory to attempts at symptom control with pharmacological therapy will be eligible and will be randomised to one of the two approaches.
The primary outcome will be all cause rehospitalisation with secondary outcomes including procedural complications, echocardiographic measurements, patient reported outcomes, all cause mortality and rehospitalisation due to cardiovascular causes. These will be assessed over the 2 years following the index procedure.
The patient reported outcome measures will be the EQ5D, AF Effect on Quality of life score (AFEQT), Hospital anxiety and depression score (HADS) and Somatosensory amplification scale.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary vein isolation | Active Comparator | Patients randomised to this arm would undergo catheter ablation targeted at achieving pulmonary vein isolation |
|
| Pacemaker implant and atrioventricular nodal ablation | Active Comparator | Patients randomised to this arm would undergo physiological pacing followed by atrioventricular nodal ablation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrioventricular nodal ablation | Procedure | Patients randomised to this arm would undergo physiological pacing followed by atrioventricular nodal ablation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| All cause rehospitalisation | All rehospitalisations for any reason will be included | 2 years |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Tung, MBBS | Contact | +61752020000 | matthew.tung@health.qld.gov.au |
Not provided
Not provided
All deidentified data will be shared with any potential research collaborators
1 Oct 2025 to 1 Oct 2035
Accessible by contact person listed
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001281 | Atrial Fibrillation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001145 | Arrhythmias, Cardiac |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Pulmonary vein isolation | Procedure | Patients randomised to this arm would undergo catheter ablation targeted at achieving pulmonary vein isolation |
|
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |