Comparative Study Between Etep-rs and Ipom Plus for Abdominal Wall Hernias
Comparative Study Between Etep-rs and Ipom Plus for Abdominal Wall Hernias
This study aims to compare the outcomes of Enhanced View Totally Extraperitoneal Rives-Stoppa (eTEP-RS) repair and Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Plus (IPOM Plus) repair in the management of ventral wall hernias. The comparison includes operative time, post-operative pain, hospital stay, surgical site occurrences, and recurrence rates. Patients will be prospectively enrolled and allocated into two groups based on the surgeon's discretion or patient-specific criteria.
Abdominal wall hernias are common surgical conditions, and multiple techniques have evolved for their repair. eTEP-RS is a relatively newer, minimally invasive approach that combines the principles of the Rives-Stoppa retromuscular mesh placement with the benefits of laparoscopic surgery. IPOM Plus, on the other hand, is a widely practiced technique involving intraperitoneal mesh placement with defect closure.
This prospective comparative study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of eTEP-RS versus IPOM Plus in patients undergoing elective repair of ventral or incisional hernias. The study will assess intra-operative parameters (e.g., duration of surgery, blood loss), early post-operative outcomes (pain score, duration of hospital stay), surgical site complications (seroma, infection, mesh-related issues), and long-term outcomes (recurrence, quality of life).
Patients fulfilling inclusion criteria will be assigned to one of the two arms. Standardized protocols will be followed for pre-operative work-up, anesthesia, surgical steps, and post-operative care. Data will be analyzed to determine if one technique offers superior clinical outcomes, better patient satisfaction, or reduced recurrence
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: