Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of PD-1 mRNA LNP Vaccine Therapy in Patients with Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Who Have Failed Advanced Standard Therapy
PD-1 mRNA LNP is an immune checkpoint mRNA vaccine loaded with the gene coding for the PD-1 protein Safety, tolerability, immunogenicity and preliminary efficacy of mRNA vaccines with PD-1 as the immunogen in the treatment of primary liver cancer. The aim of this study is to establish a novel PD-1-based mRNA for the treatment of advanced cancers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low Dose | Experimental | Low-dose PD-1 mRNA LNP vaccine for advanced primary hepatocellular carcinoma failing standard therapy |
|
| High Dose | Experimental | High Dose PD-1 mRNA LNP Vaccine for Advanced Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Failing Standard Treatment |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low Dose PD-1 mRNA LNP Vaccine | Drug | Patients will receive PD-1 mRNA LNP vaccine at 50 mcg weekly for the first 4 doses and a 5th dose 1 month after the 4th dose. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Adverse events | Adverse events defined as the number of participants with adverse events | One month after the first vaccine dose |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Disease Control Rate (DCR) | The ratio of subjects assessed with CR or PR or stable disease (SD) as a best overalresponse. | Two month after the first vaccine dose |
| DRR (Durable Response Rate) | DRR is defined as the proportion of objective response (CR and PR as determined by the investigator) lasting at least 6 months at any time within 12 months of initiation of treatment. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Male or female patients: ≥18 years of age; ≤70 years of age;
Recurrent or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma that has failed second-line standard therapy.
Patients with at least one target lesion with a measurable diameter according to the RECIST criteria (CT scan of tumor lesions with a long diameter of ≥10mm, CT scan of lymph node lesions with a short diameter of ≥10mm and a layer thickness of no more than 5mm);
ECOG physical condition score: 0 to 1;
Expected survival ≥ 3 months;
Good function of major organs, i.e., relevant examination indexes within 14 days prior to randomization meet the following requirements:
Good compliance and family agreement to cooperate in receiving survival follow-up.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xingchen Peng | Contact | 18980606753 | pxx2014@163.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Xingchen Peng | West China Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| West China Hospital, Sichuan University | Not yet recruiting | Chengdu | Sichuan | 610041 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27493875 | Result | Chen X, Wu Y, Yang T, Wei M, Wang Y, Deng X, Shen C, Li W, Zhang H, Xu W, Gou L, Zeng Y, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Yang J. Salidroside alleviates cachexia symptoms in mouse models of cancer cachexia via activating mTOR signalling. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016 May;7(2):225-32. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12054. Epub 2016 Jan 18. | |
| 36776873 | Result |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008113 | Liver Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
This single-centre, open-label, single-arm trial uses a dose-escalation framework to evaluate the safety and biological activity of PD-1 mRNA LNP in the treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who have failed standard therapy. All participants will maintain a fixed chemotherapy/immunotherapy regimen based on their respective malignancies, with only the dose of PD-1 mRNA LNP changing.
Three cases will be enrolled in each dose group, with the planned dose groups being the 50 μg, 75 μg and 100 μg groups. It consisted of 5 doses of basal immunisation and subsequent personalised treatment. For the base immunisation, the first 4 doses were administered 1 week apart each and the 5th dose was administered 1 month after the 4th dose.
Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) will be monitored through a 21-day monitoring window. Escalation decisions will be made using a Bayesian Optimal Interval (BOIN) approach, with DLT classification following the
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| High dose PD-1 mRNA LNP vaccines | Drug | Patients will receive PD-1 mRNA LNP vaccine at 100 mcg weekly for the first 4 doses and a 5th dose 1 month after the 4th dose. |
|
|
| Six month after the first vaccine dose |
| DOR (Duration of Response) | DOR is defined as the time from the date when the PR is first recorded or better to the date when the disease progression is first recorded (for the responder, i.e., PR or better). Responders who did not record disease progress will be censored on the date that the last assessment was SD or better. | Six month after the first vaccine dose |
| TTR (Response Time) | TTR is defined as the time from the date of the first administration to the date of the first record of the objective tumor response (CR and PR determined by the investigator). | Six month after the first vaccine dose |
| PFS (progression-free survival) | PFS is defined as the duration until disease progression or death in participants fromthe first dose of immunization. | Six month after the first vaccine dose |
| OS (Overall Survival) | 0S is defined as the duration until death in participants from the first dose ofimmunization. | Six month after the first vaccine dose |
| TTP (Time to Progression) | TTP is defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of first documented disease progression, as defined by standard disease criteria. | up to 6 months |
| Sichuan University West China Hospital | Recruiting | Chengdu | Sichuan | China |
|
| Wu Y, Li W, Chen X, Wang H, Su S, Xu Y, Deng X, Yang T, Wei M, Li L, Liu Y, Yang J, Li W. DOG1 as a novel antibody-drug conjugate target for the treatment of multiple gastrointestinal tumors and liver metastasis. Front Immunol. 2023 Jan 26;14:1051506. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1051506. eCollection 2023. |
| 29653760 | Result | Sabnis S, Kumarasinghe ES, Salerno T, Mihai C, Ketova T, Senn JJ, Lynn A, Bulychev A, McFadyen I, Chan J, Almarsson O, Stanton MG, Benenato KE. A Novel Amino Lipid Series for mRNA Delivery: Improved Endosomal Escape and Sustained Pharmacology and Safety in Non-human Primates. Mol Ther. 2018 Jun 6;26(6):1509-1519. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.03.010. Epub 2018 Mar 14. |
| 34672423 | Result | Selvaggio G, Leonardelli L, Lofano G, Fresnay S, Parolo S, Medini D, Siena E, Marchetti L. A quantitative systems pharmacology approach to support mRNA vaccine development and optimization. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2021 Dec;10(12):1448-1451. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12721. Epub 2021 Oct 21. No abstract available. |
| 32916818 | Result | Xu S, Yang K, Li R, Zhang L. mRNA Vaccine Era-Mechanisms, Drug Platform and Clinical Prospection. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Sep 9;21(18):6582. doi: 10.3390/ijms21186582. |
| 31699497 | Result | Linares-Fernandez S, Lacroix C, Exposito JY, Verrier B. Tailoring mRNA Vaccine to Balance Innate/Adaptive Immune Response. Trends Mol Med. 2020 Mar;26(3):311-323. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Nov 5. |
| 36351374 | Result | Verbeke R, Hogan MJ, Lore K, Pardi N. Innate immune mechanisms of mRNA vaccines. Immunity. 2022 Nov 8;55(11):1993-2005. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.10.014. |
| 35310381 | Result | Lim SA, Cox A, Tung M, Chung EJ. Clinical progress of nanomedicine-based RNA therapies. Bioact Mater. 2021 Oct 22;12:203-213. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.018. eCollection 2022 Jun. |
| 30770959 | Result | Sebastian M, Schroder A, Scheel B, Hong HS, Muth A, von Boehmer L, Zippelius A, Mayer F, Reck M, Atanackovic D, Thomas M, Schneller F, Stohlmacher J, Bernhard H, Groschel A, Lander T, Probst J, Strack T, Wiegand V, Gnad-Vogt U, Kallen KJ, Hoerr I, von der Muelbe F, Fotin-Mleczek M, Knuth A, Koch SD. A phase I/IIa study of the mRNA-based cancer immunotherapy CV9201 in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2019 May;68(5):799-812. doi: 10.1007/s00262-019-02315-x. Epub 2019 Feb 15. |
| 28123889 | Result | Hong HS, Koch SD, Scheel B, Gnad-Vogt U, Schroder A, Kallen KJ, Wiegand V, Backert L, Kohlbacher O, Hoerr I, Fotin-Mleczek M, Billingsley JM. Distinct transcriptional changes in non-small cell lung cancer patients associated with multi-antigenic RNActive(R) CV9201 immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology. 2016 Nov 18;5(12):e1249560. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1249560. eCollection 2016. |
| 36174631 | Result | Lorentzen CL, Haanen JB, Met O, Svane IM. Clinical advances and ongoing trials on mRNA vaccines for cancer treatment. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Oct;23(10):e450-e458. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00372-2. |
| 36650562 | Result | Yuan Y, Gao F, Chang Y, Zhao Q, He X. Advances of mRNA vaccine in tumor: a maze of opportunities and challenges. Biomark Res. 2023 Jan 18;11(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40364-023-00449-w. |
| 33632261 | Result | Miao L, Zhang Y, Huang L. mRNA vaccine for cancer immunotherapy. Mol Cancer. 2021 Feb 25;20(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01335-5. |
| D008107 |
| Liver Diseases |