Sarcoma Surgery Wound Complications Comparing Usual Versus Negative Pressure Dressing: a Randomised Phase II Trial
Sarcoma Surgery Wound Complications Comparing Usual Versus Negative Pressure Dressing: a Randomised Phase II Trial
To compare the differences in clinical outcomes and health economics between standard absorbent dressings versus Negative Pressure Wound Therapy dressings following the surgical resection of sarcoma tumours.
The investigators propose to undertake a randomised controlled trial comparing standard absorbent dressings with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) dressings in the wound management following resection of sarcoma tumours. By using, NPWT in sarcoma patients the investigators aim to reduce the number of patients experiencing wound complications compared to those who receive standard absorbent dressings. 94 participants will be recruited over 12 months and randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the standard or NPWT dressings. The primary aim will be to determine whether there is a clinically significant difference in wound complications between standard dressings and NPWT dressings over a four-month post-op period. The investigators will assess the patient's wound for signs of infection, dehiscence and other potential complications, and document the incidence and severity of complications. Researchers will also collect the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society Score (MSTS) and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) at pre-op and 4 months post-op to understand how the dressings may have impacted function following recovery. In addition, health economic data will also be captured in the form for ED-5D-5L and questionnaires that will focus on the economic impact of surgery and potential wound complications on a patient return to work.
Wound complications following sarcoma tumour surgery can be traumatic for patients during their recovery and postpone subsequent chemotherapy treatments, as well as being an expensive burden to the NHS. NPWT dressings may potentially offer benefits to both patients and the NHS yet there is insufficient data available to support widespread use of this product in sarcoma patients. It is the investigators belief that NPWT is used because anecdotally it is believed to be better than standard absorbent dressings. However, there is a clear lack of robust evidence to support this idea, and the investigator aim to address this by undertaking this study..
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
eileen.soulis@glasgow.ac.uk+4401413017184
james.doonan@glasgow.ac.uk+44 0141 201 6535