Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| King's College London | OTHER |
| University of Talca | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Mental health disorders are one of the leading causes of illness globally. The importance of psychosocial skills acquired in early childhood, such as executive functions, inhibitory control, emotional regulation, and social problem-solving, in preventing mental disorders has been reported. Furthermore, mental health care delivery is evolving, and mobile technology is becoming the medium for assessment and intervention. We developed Japi 1.0, a video game, to stimulate cognitive and non-cognitive skills in early childhood. This study aims to assess the functionality of this video game, student engagement and behavior, classroom climate, the feasibility of the implementation of the study and to explore the impact of the video game on the development of cognitive and non-cognitive skills.
The use of technology in preventive interventions allows, on the one hand, the development of cost-effective strategies and, on the other, access to a large population. There are a number of therapeutic and preventive initiatives that have begun to be used in the mental health field in adolescents and adults. These interventions have been delivered through websites or mobile applications, and have shown some effectiveness. However, there are no studies on using these technologies in preschool populations. There is consensus in the scientific community that the stimulation of cognitive and non-cognitive skills in the first years of life promotes development in general and produces a beneficial impact in the long term on health and on different economic indicators.
The objectives of this research are: 1) To develop a video game prototype to be used on tablets by pre-kindergarten students from socio-economically vulnerable schools, which allows stimulating working memory, behavioral inhibition, emotion recognition, and social problem-solving skills in such a way as to prevent the development of behavioral problems and general psychological distress; 2) To carry out a pilot cluster Randomized Controlled Trial to evaluate several aspects of functionality of this video game, student engagement and behavior, classroom climate, the feasibility of the implementation of the study and to explore the impact of the video game on the development of cognitive and non-cognitive skills.
It is expected to recruit eight schools with at least one pre-kindergarten class, with an average of 30 students per class. Schools will be randomly allocated to intervention and control groups in a ratio of 1:1. The control group will receive their usual curricular activities. Meanwhile, the students in the intervention group will play the ten 30-minute video game sessions supervised by preschool teachers and research assistants. The frequency of sessions is expected to be twice a week for 5 weeks. Both groups will be evaluated at the beginning and after implementing Japi 1.0. The assessment will include the direct in-person measurement of working memory, behavioral inhibition, emotion recognition, and social problem-solving skills among children and evaluating children's emotional and behavioral problems rated by parents or caregivers. As the primary outcomes of this study are the evaluation of the functionality of this video game, student engagement, and behavior during playing, classroom climate, and the feasibility of the implementation of the study, the research team has developed quantitative and qualitative measures to collect this data.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Japi 1.0 Intervention | Experimental | Video game of 10 sessions with activities stimulating cognitive (working memory and inhibitory control) and non-cognitve (emotion recognition and social competence) skills. Children will play with the game two times a week, each lasting 30 minutes, over 5 weeks. Sessions numbers 1 to 5 were focused on emotional recognition and inhibitory control. Sessions numbers 6 to 10 worked on working memory and social competence. Each session had eight activities and five tasks per activity with increasing difficulty levels. |
|
| Control | No Intervention | The control group receives standard school curricula. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Japi 1.0 | Behavioral | The intervention has ten sessions, and two sessions of 30 minutes were delivered each week for 5 weeks. Sessions numbers 1 to 5 were focused on emotional recognition and inhibitory control. Sessions numbers 6 to 10 worked on working memory and social competence. Each session had eight activities and five tasks per activity with increasing difficulty levels. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Functionality of video game: Mechanical errors | The number of errors in the video game (e.g., wrong interface, stuck or frozen screen, wrong reward stimulus after students´ correct responses) registered for tasks and activities during sessions. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Functionality of video game: Failure to record data in the server | The number of students whose data from video game play was not recorded in the server. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Poor student engagement | Percentage of students who lack attention and engagement and prematurely stop playing, making them unable to finish the tasks and activities during each session. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Feasibility: number of eligible schools | The number of eligible schools, those contacted, and those who agreed to participate. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Feasibility: Participant recruitment | The number of parents/caregivers and students who were contacted and those who consented and agreed to participate. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Feasibility: Attrition | The number of participants' losses during the study. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Feasibility: Intervention duration |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Working Memory: Corsi Block Test | This test assesses visuospatial short-term working memory. It involves repeating a sequence of up to nine identical spatially separated blocks on a screen. The sequence starts simple but becomes more complex until the subject's performance declines. This number is known as the Corsi Span. The higher the score, the better the skill. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria Schools:
Exclusion Criteria Schools:
Inclusion Criteria for Students:
- Children attending pre-kindergarten (aged around 4 years old).
Exclusion criteria for Students
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jorge E Gaete, MD. PhD. | Universidad de Los Andes | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universidad de los Andes | Santiago | Las Condes | 7620086 | Chile |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Carlson S, Zelazo P. Minnesota executive function scale: Test manual. Saint Paul, MN: Reflection Sciences. 2014. | ||
| 11699809 | Background | Goodman R. Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Nov;40(11):1337-45. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015. | |
| 9255702 |
Not provided
Not provided
Individual participant data will not be shared due to ethical considerations, however tha data as a whole will be available on request to the Principal Investigator.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000092862 | Psychological Well-Being |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010549 | Personal Satisfaction |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Intervention versus Treatment as Usual
Not provided
Not provided
Statistician was blinded to the group allocation
|
Data will be collected on the time needed to complete the intervention. |
| Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Feasibility: Time requirement needed for measurements | Time invested in baseline and after-intervention measurements. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Feasibility: Student attandance | We will collect student attendance data by session to play with Japi 1.0. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Working Memory: Woodcock- Muñoz Auditive Working Memory test | A sequence of audio messages of words and numbers of increased difficulty is presented, and the child is requested to remember these sequences-the higher the score, the better the skill. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Inhibitory control: The Hearts and Flowers task | The Hearts and Flowers task combines elements of Simon and spatial Stroop tasks. Children must follow the rule for congruent trials: "Press on the same side as the stimulus (Hearts)." For incongruent trials, children must follow the rule: "Press on the side opposite the stimulus (Flowers)." It requires working memory and inhibition control. The higher the score, the better the skill. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Executive function: The Minnesota Executive Function Scale (MEFS) | This instrument evaluates executive functions, specifically cognitive flexibility, working memory, and inhibitory control, among individuals beginning at 24 months and extending throughout their lifespan. It is an adaptive virtual card-sorting task delivered on a tablet (4-minute average test duration). The higher the score, the better the skill. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Emotion recognition: Assessment of Children's Emotions Skills (ACES) | It consists of a facial expressions task aiming to evaluate emotion expression knowledge and whether the subjects exhibit any anger bias. The 26-item scale consists of color photographs of ethnically diverse elementary schoolchildren depicting four expressions of the four basic emotions (happy, sad, angry, and scared) and 10 images of children without obvious facial expressions. The examiner shows the child the photographs one at a time and each time asks, "Is the child in the picture happy, sad, angry, or scared?" Then, the examiner registers the child's answer. The emotion accuracy score reflects how many items the children answer correctly (16 points is the perfect score). The higher the score, the better the skill. Additionally, there is an anger bias score, which is the number of times the children incorrectly identify the faces as displaying anger. The higher the score, the higher the anger bias. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Social competence: Challenging Situations Task (CST) | This instrument evaluates the ability of children to solve social problems. The children are presented with six vignettes that describe problems between peers. Following the presentation of each challenging situation, four pictures of happy, sad, angry, and neutral affect are presented in random order. The child is asked to point to the picture that best describes how they feel when [one of the situations] happens. Then, four pictures of behavioral responses (prosocial, aggressive, disruptive, or less adaptative behavior [cry], and avoidant) are presented in random order, and the child is asked, "What do you do in this situation]?" The answers are categorized into four possibilities: prosocial, aggressive, cry, and avoidant. Scores for affective and behavioral responses used are the number of times each affect, and each behavioral response is chosen by each child across the six situations. The higher the prosocial behavioral response score, the better the skill. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Behavioral problems and psychological assessment: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). | This 25-question questionnaire explores different symptoms grouped into 5 sub-scales (with 5 items each): (1) emotional symptoms, (2) behavioral problems, (3) problems with peers, (4) symptoms of lack of attention and hyperactivity, and (5) prosocial skills. The first four sub-scales refer to children's difficulties and may be grouped into a general sub-scale of difficulties (20 items). The sub-scale of prosocial skills refers to positive and adaptive behaviors in relationships. Each item is answered on a scale of responses from 1=not true to 3=absolutely true. There is a version for Educators and parents (to evaluate children from 4 to 16 years old) and a self-report for teenagers (ages 11 to 16 years old). The Parents' version of this instrument will be used-the higher the score in the total difficulties sub-scale, the higher the behavior problems in the case of the prosocial sub-scale; the higher the score, the higher the prosocial skill. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Background |
| Goodman R. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;38(5):581-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x. |
| 23659890 | Background | Denham SA, Way E, Kalb SC, Warren-Khot HK, Bassett HH. Preschoolers' social information processing and early school success: the challenging situations task. Br J Dev Psychol. 2013 Jun;31(Pt 2):180-97. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2012.02085.x. Epub 2012 Sep 27. |
| 36229629 | Background | Chung C, Choi S, Bae J, Jeong H, Lee J, Lee H. Developing and Validating a Korean Version of the Assessment of Children's Emotional Skills. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Jun;55(3):819-830. doi: 10.1007/s10578-022-01452-2. Epub 2022 Oct 13. |
| 16580701 | Background | Davidson MC, Amso D, Anderson LC, Diamond A. Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(11):2037-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.006. Epub 2006 Mar 31. |
| 7584287 | Background | Gathercole SE, Willis CS, Baddeley AD, Emslie H. The Children's Test of Nonword Repetition: a test of phonological working memory. Memory. 1994 Jun;2(2):103-27. doi: 10.1080/09658219408258940. |
| 7870543 | Background | Orsini A. Corsi's block-tapping test: standardization and concurrent validity with WISC-R for children aged 11 to 16. Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Dec;79(3 Pt 2):1547-54. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.3f.1547. |
| 19213617 | Background | Doyle O, Harmon CP, Heckman JJ, Tremblay RE. Investing in early human development: timing and economic efficiency. Econ Hum Biol. 2009 Mar;7(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Jan 21. |
| 24675955 | Background | Campbell F, Conti G, Heckman JJ, Moon SH, Pinto R, Pungello E, Pan Y. Early childhood investments substantially boost adult health. Science. 2014 Mar 28;343(6178):1478-85. doi: 10.1126/science.1248429. |
| 30924316 | Background | Bucci S, Schwannauer M, Berry N. The digital revolution and its impact on mental health care. Psychol Psychother. 2019 Jun;92(2):277-297. doi: 10.1111/papt.12222. Epub 2019 Mar 28. |
| 18193994 | Background | Garon N, Bryson SE, Smith IM. Executive function in preschoolers: a review using an integrative framework. Psychol Bull. 2008 Jan;134(1):31-60. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.31. |
| 17651888 | Background | Berger A, Kofman O, Livneh U, Henik A. Multidisciplinary perspectives on attention and the development of self-regulation. Prog Neurobiol. 2007 Aug;82(5):256-86. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.06.004. Epub 2007 Jun 22. |
| 21291449 | Background | Durlak JA, Weissberg RP, Dymnicki AB, Taylor RD, Schellinger KB. The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;82(1):405-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x. |
| 20563300 | Background | Cunha F, Heckman J, Schennach S. Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation. Econometrica. 2010 May 1;78(3):883-931. doi: 10.3982/ECTA6551. |
| 35026139 | Background | GBD 2019 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;9(2):137-150. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00395-3. Epub 2022 Jan 10. |