Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 82271001; 82370991; 2022KY872 | Other Grant/Funding Number | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC); Zhejiang Provincial Department of Science and Technology |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Natural Science Foundation of China | OTHER_GOV |
| The Dental Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate how the vertical distance from the sinus floor to the lower margin of the lateral window affects bone regeneration and implant outcomes after lateral sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant placement. The main question it aims to answer is:
Does a sinus floor-to-window margin distance ≥3 mm lead to better bone augmentation and implant stability compared to a distance <3 mm?
This is a retrospective, single-center cohort study. Participants included patients who had previously undergone lateral sinus floor elevation with implant placement and had at least 6 months of postoperative follow-up. Cone-beam CT images were used to measure radiographic outcomes such as alveolar bone height and augmented volume.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| DSLW ≥ 3 mm | Patients undergoing lateral sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant placement, in whom the distance from the sinus floor to the lower edge of the lateral window is greater than or equal to 3 mm. | ||
| DSLW < 3 mm | Patients undergoing lateral sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant placement, in whom the distance from the sinus floor to the lower edge of the lateral window is less than 3 mm. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| ABH at T1, ABH at T2, ABH change from T1 to T2, ESBG at T1, ESBG at T2, ESBG change from T1 to T2, BBH at T1, BBH at T2, BBH change from T1 to T2, PBH at T1, PBH at T2, PBH change from T1 to T2, AV at T1, AV at T2, AV change from T1 to T2 | ABH at T1 (mm): Alveolar bone height measured immediately after surgery; ABH at T2 (mm): ABH measured 6 months after surgery; ABH change from T1 to T2 (%): ABH Calculated as ((T2 - T1) / T1) × 100%; ESBG at T1 (mm): Elevated sinus bone gain measured immediately after surgery; ESBG at T2 (mm): ESBG measured 6 months after surgery; ESBG change from T1 to T2 (%): ESBG Calculated as ((T2 - T1) / T1) × 100%; BBH at T1 (mm): Buccal bone height measured immediately after surgery; BBH at T2 (mm): BBH measured 6 months after surgery; BBH change from T1 to T2 (%): BBH Calculated as ((T2 - T1) / T1) × 100%; PBH at T1 (mm): Palatal bone height measured immediately after surgery; PBH at T2 (mm): PBH measured 6 months after surgery; PBH change from T1 to T2 (%): PBH Calculated as ((T2 - T1) / T1) × 100%; AV at T1 (mm³): Augmented volume measured immediately after surgery; AV at T1(mm³): AV measured 6 months after surgery; AV change from T1 to T2 (%): AV Calculated as ((T2 - T1) / T1) × 100% | T1 (immediately after surgery) and T2 (6 months after surgery) |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Patients undergoing lateral sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant placement at a single academic hospital in China. Inclusion was based on availability of preoperative CBCT and a follow-up period of at least 6 months. Patients were grouped according to the vertical distance from the sinus floor to the lower margin of the lateral window.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Affiliated Hospital, School of Stomatology, Zhejiang University. | Hangzhou | Zhejiang | 310000 | China |
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to the retrospective nature of the study and ethical considerations related to patient privacy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided