Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14119721 | Other Grant/Funding Number | General Research Fund, Research Grants Council (RGC), Hong Kong |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the therapeutic effect of the Hybrid Bracing Protocol (HyBP) over the Conventional Brace in enhancing In-brace Correction (IBC) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis(AIS).
Scoliosis is a complex three-dimensional spinal deformity and AIS is the commonest with a high prevalence of 2-4%. If left untreated, AIS can progress resulting in significant health problems including back degeneration and negative body images.
Bracing, such as Underarm Brace(UAB) used in our center, is indicated for skeletally immature patients with Cobb angle>20°. Another bracing system is a nighttime Lateral Bending Brace(LBB) designed in a bending position opposite to the convexity of the curve thus resulting in its overcorrection. If AIS becomes severe despite bracing, ultra-major surgery is indicated aiming at bony fusion of the deformed segment with instrumentation. It is therefore important to maximize treatment effectiveness with bracing to control curve progression and to avoid the need for surgery. In-brace Correction(IBC) is the percentage reduction in Cobb angle with bracing.
Studies have reported IBC is an important determinant of brace effectiveness. For enhancement of IBC, we put forward the Hybrid Bracing Protocol(HyBP) combining the use of daytime UAB and nighttime LBB. To be best of our knowledge, HyBP has never been reported in the literature. Our pilot study on 8 patients treated with HyBP and 8 Cobb-matched historical controls treated with fulltime UAB showed very promising results with IBC of 42.1±22.0% and 22.1±14.9% in the HyBP and control group respectively. We therefore propose a formal prospective rater-blinded randomized controlled trial on 120 skeletally immature AIS female subjects with single thoracolumbar or lumbar curve newly prescribed with bracing. They are randomly allocated to the HyBP Group or the Conventional Brace Group (CB Group). The primary objective is to determine if the HyBP Group has better treatment effect in terms of In-brace Correction (IBC) when compared with the CB group at 3-month and 18-month after bracing. This is a 3-year study proposal representing the first phase of a project, to be followed by the second phase of the project when all subjects of the entire cohort will be assessed on curve outcome at time of completion of bracing and at 2 years post-bracing. This study will carry significant clinical impacts in that, if proven useful, the HyBP can be used for enhancement of treatment outcomes with bracing, thus preventing the scoliotic spine from deterioration and to avoid the need for surgery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hybrid Bracing | Experimental | Hybrid Bracing Protocol (HyBP) combining the use of daytime Underarm Brace (UAB) and a nighttime Lateral Bending Brace |
|
| Conventional fulltime underarm bracing (UAB) | Active Comparator | Conventional group uses fulltime underarm bracing (UAB) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hybrid Bracing | Other | Hybrid Bracing includes daytime Underarm Brace(UAB) and nighttime Lateral Bending Brace(LBB) |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| In-brace Correction (IBC) | Although bracing is considered to be useful, its effectiveness hinges on various factors one of which is the in-brace curve correction, ie In-brace Correction (IBC). IBC is defined as the percentage of Cobb angle change during an X-ray with the brace fitted on the patient. | From date of randomization, assessed up to 2 years after bracing stopped at skeletal maturity |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Curve progression | To determine if the HyBP has better treatment outcomes in terms of control of curve progression when compared with the conventional fulltime UAB | From date of randomization, assessed up to 2 years after bracing stopped at skeletal maturity |
| Quality of life questionnaires |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Adam Yiu Chung Lau, FRCSEd (Orth) | Chinese University of Hong Kong | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prince of Wales Hospital | Hong Kong | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42152027 | Derived | Lau AYC, Kee HM, Yang KG, Kwan ECK, Hung ALH, Lee WYW, Wong MS, Cheng JCY, Lam TP. Full-time bracing versus hybrid bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2026 May 19. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09787-0. Online ahead of print. |
Not provided
Not provided
Patient privacy
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Mar 15, 2021 | Jun 17, 2025 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Conventional fulltime Underarm Bracing | Other | Conventional group includes fulltime Underarm Brace (UAB) only. |
|
To determine if the HyBP has better outcomes when compared with the conventional fulltime UAB in terms of quality of life as assessed by SRS-22r, Spinal Appearance Questionnaire and the Brace Questionnaire |
| From date of randomization, assessed up to 2 years after bracing stopped at skeletal maturity |
| Prot_000.pdf |