Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Null findings from similar study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Society of Family Planning | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the use of high frequency TENS for pain control during IUD insertion. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a relatively low-cost, low-risk, non-pharmacologic intervention for pain management. Previous studies have found that TENS reduces pain associated with other outpatient gynecological procedures. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either active treatment or placebo (placebo TENS) and record pain scores using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) at the time of IUD insertion. The same device will be used for both active and placebo treatment.
The researchers will recruit eligible participants from patients who opt for IUD initiation or replacement during ambulatory care visits at the Center for Women's Health and Midwifery and Yale Family Planning Clinic. Allocation to treatment will be based on a 1:1 blocked randomization scheme. A member of the research/clinical staff other than the provider performing IUD insertion will identify the treatment allocation assigned to the corresponding subject ID. The research staff member will set up the TENS unit accordingly by applying pads to the participant and initiating treatment with the correct settings. When setup is complete, the provider performing the IUD insertion and other clinical staff assisting with the procedure will enter the exam room with no knowledge of TENS treatment assignment to insert the IUD.
REDCap, a HIPAA-compliant, secure web application used for building and managing online surveys and databases, will be used for data collection in this study. Participants will complete three electronic surveys in REDCap during the study. The first survey is a baseline survey to collect demographics as well as medical, obstetric, and gynecologic history and other characteristics prior to the IUD insertion procedure.
IUD insertion will be performed by complex family planning faculty and fellows, as well as OB/GYN residents on their family planning rotation. A research staff member will be within reach of the study participant during the procedure to collect pain scores using a visual analog scale (VAS) presented on an iPad.
The second survey will have a visual analog scale for study participants to rate their pain between 0 and 100 at the following timepoints during IUD insertion:
The third survey will ask participants about reflections on their experience with IUD insertion and acceptability of the TENS device, and their past experiences. Clinical Providers who perform the IUD insertion will be asked to take a post IUD insertion survey. This survey will ask questions about the insertion and perceived patient pain.
Participation in the study is expected to only last one day, the day of IUD insertion.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active TENS | Active Comparator | For the Active TENS group, the device will be set to 80 Hz (hfTENS) and device intensity (0-8) will be titrated to patient comfort, as is the standard protocol for TENS use. |
|
| Placebo TENS | Placebo Comparator | For the placebo TENS group, setup will be identical, but the device will not be turned on. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) | Device | The TENS 7000 digital TENS unit is a low cost, over the counter, battery operated device with high consumer ratings. The handheld device works by transmitting an electronically generated topical stimulus to a specified area on the body to alter response to pain signals and promote endogenous endorphin release for pain reduction. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain reported on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | Pain Visual Analog Scale - full scale from 0-100, higher score indicates higher level of pain. | Day 1 (Day of IUD insertion) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Post Procedure Surveys | Identify factors other than exposure to TENS associated with higher reported pain, and the acceptability of the TENS device by both patients and providers. Questions answered as yes or no, or on a 4 to 5-point scale. | Day 1 (Day of IUD insertion) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria Patient Participants:
Inclusion Criteria Provider Participants:
Exclusion Criteria Patient Participants:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Tessa Madden, MD, MPH | Yale University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Center for Women's Health and Midwifery | New Haven | Connecticut | 06519 | United States | ||
| Yale Family Planning Clinic |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38307487 | Background | Gero A, Elliott S, Baayd J, Cohen S, Simmons RG, Gawron LM. Factors associated with a negative Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) response with intrauterine device placement: A retrospective survey of HER Salt Lake participants. Contraception. 2024 May;133:110385. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110385. Epub 2024 Feb 1. | |
| 31563628 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Implants and Intrauterine Devices | View source |
Not provided
Individual participant data meta-analysis for this study will not be done. De-identified individual participant data will be analyzed according to the statistical plan mentioned in the study protocol for manuscript preparation and journal publication. Individual participant data will be shared within the study team. Also, IPD will be shared with the IRB according to institutional guidelines.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004561 | Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004599 | Electric Stimulation Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D026741 | Physical Therapy Modalities |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) | Device | The TENS 7000 digital TENS unit is a low cost, over the counter, battery operated device with high consumer ratings. The handheld device works by transmitting an electronically generated topical stimulus to a specified area on the body to alter response to pain signals and promote endogenous endorphin release for pain reduction. |
|
| New Haven |
| Connecticut |
| 06519 |
| United States |
| Hunter TA, Sonalkar S, Schreiber CA, Perriera LK, Sammel MD, Akers AY. Anticipated Pain During Intrauterine Device Insertion. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020 Feb;33(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Sep 26. |
| 36473194 | Background | Wu J, Trahair E, Happ M, Swartz J. TikTok, #IUD, and User Experience With Intrauterine Devices Reported on Social Media. Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan 1;141(1):215-217. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005027. Epub 2022 Dec 5. |
| 34590968 | Background | Svahn S, Niemeyer Hultstrand J, Tyden T, Ekstrand Ragnar M. Contraception use and attitudes: women's concerns regarding hormonal contraception and copper intrauterine devices. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2021 Dec;26(6):473-478. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2021.1975267. Epub 2021 Sep 30. |
| 24882426 | Background | Bracken J, Graham CA. Young women's attitudes towards, and experiences of, long-acting reversible contraceptives. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2014 Aug;19(4):276-84. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2014.917623. Epub 2014 Jun 2. |
| 30095776 | Background | Mody SK, Farala JP, Jimenez B, Nishikawa M, Ngo LL. Paracervical Block for Intrauterine Device Placement Among Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132(3):575-582. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002790. |
| 27591814 | Background | Lohr PA, Lyus R, Prager S. Use of intrauterine devices in nulliparous women. Contraception. 2017 Jun;95(6):529-537. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Aug 31. |
| 24828514 | Background | Pergialiotis V, Vlachos DG, Protopappas A, Vlachos GD. Analgesic options for placement of an intrauterine contraceptive: a meta-analysis. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2014 Jun;19(3):149-60. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2014.903238. Epub 2014 May 14. |
| 25276703 | Background | Shahnazi M, Nikjoo R, Yavarikia P, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S. Inhaled lavender effect on anxiety and pain caused from intrauterine device insertion. J Caring Sci. 2012 Nov 28;1(4):255-61. doi: 10.5681/jcs.2012.035. eCollection 2012 Dec. |
| 31882291 | Background | Nguyen L, Lamarche L, Lennox R, Ramdyal A, Patel T, Black M, Mangin D. Strategies to Mitigate Anxiety and Pain in Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Systematic Review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 Sep;42(9):1138-1146.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.09.014. Epub 2019 Dec 25. |
| 34114522 | Background | Cimsir MT, Yildiz MS. Could the Valsalva manoeuvre be an alternative to the tenaculum for intrauterine device insertion? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2021 Dec;26(6):503-506. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2021.1934442. Epub 2021 Jun 11. |
| 38586685 | Background | Rahman M, King C, Saikaly R, Sosa M, Sibaja K, Tran B, Tran S, Morello P, Yeon Seo S, Yeon Seo Y, Jacobs RJ. Differing Approaches to Pain Management for Intrauterine Device Insertion and Maintenance: A Scoping Review. Cureus. 2024 Mar 8;16(3):e55785. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55785. eCollection 2024 Mar. |
| 31112295 | Background | Gemzell-Danielsson K, Jensen JT, Monteiro I, Peers T, Rodriguez M, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Bahamondes L. Interventions for the prevention of pain associated with the placement of intrauterine contraceptives: An updated review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Dec;98(12):1500-1513. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13662. Epub 2019 Jun 27. |
| 26222246 | Background | Lopez LM, Bernholc A, Zeng Y, Allen RH, Bartz D, O'Brien PA, Hubacher D. Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 29;2015(7):CD007373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007373.pub3. |
| 36412569 | Background | Babazadeh-Zavieh SS, Bashardoust Tajali S, Haeri SMJ, Shamsi A. Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Complement Med Res. 2023;30(2):161-173. doi: 10.1159/000528133. Epub 2022 Nov 21. |
| 35249825 | Background | Guy M, Foucher C, Juhel C, Rigaudier F, Mayeux G, Levesque A. Transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation relieves primary dysmenorrhea: A randomized, double-blind clinical study versus placebo. Prog Urol. 2022 Jul;32(7):487-497. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Mar 3. |
| 38366860 | Background | Gonzalez-Mena A, Leiros-Rodriguez R, Hernandez-Lucas P. Treatment of Women With Primary Dysmenorrhea With Manual Therapy and Electrotherapy Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther. 2024 May 1;104(5):pzae019. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzae019. |
| 34352845 | Background | Lerma K, Goldthwaite LM, Blumenthal PD, Shaw KA. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Pain Management of Aspiration Abortion up to 83 Days of Gestation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep 1;138(3):417-425. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004502. |
| 33278292 | Background | Goldman AR, Porsch L, Hintermeister A, Dragoman M. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation to Reduce Pain With Medication Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan 1;137(1):100-107. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004208. |
| 28079781 | Background | Lison JF, Amer-Cuenca JJ, Piquer-Marti S, Benavent-Caballer V, Bivia-Roig G, Marin-Buck A. Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation for Pain Relief During Office Hysteroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;129(2):363-370. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001842. |
| 33627077 | Background | Njogu A, Qin S, Chen Y, Hu L, Luo Y. The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation during the first stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Feb 24;21(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03625-8. |
| 10896017 | Background | Gopalkrishnan P, Sluka KA. Effect of varying frequency, intensity, and pulse duration of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on primary hyperalgesia in inflamed rats. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Jul;81(7):984-90. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.5576. |
| 30725873 | Background | Teoli D, Dua A, An J. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation. 2024 Mar 20. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537188/ |
| 24953072 | Background | Vance CG, Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Sluka KA. Using TENS for pain control: the state of the evidence. Pain Manag. 2014 May;4(3):197-209. doi: 10.2217/pmt.14.13. |
| Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10, PROMIS Global-10. APTA | View source |
| D000698 |
| Analgesia |
| D000760 | Anesthesia and Analgesia |