Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of the IL-22BP in patients with refractory malignant solid tumors.
Cancer is a leading global cause of death, with advanced cases posing significant treatment challenges due to low efficacy and severe side effects. Gene therapy, especially mRNA-based immunogene therapy, offers promise. IL-22 promotes tumor progression, and its antagonist, IL-22BP, can inhibit tumor growth.
Patients with refractory, metastatic solid tumors unresponsive to second-line therapy lack viable options. This study aims to establish a novel IL-22BP-based mRNA treatment for advanced cancers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Cohort | Experimental | In this study, three patients were grouped together. Subsequently, doses of 25 μg and 50 μg of the IL-22BP were administered to them respectively. The treatment will be administered by intratumoral injection. Enrolled subjects will receive inoculations of IL22BP injection according to their respective dose groups, which include 5 doses for basic immunization. During the basic immunization, the first 4 doses will be given at an interval of 1 week each, and the 5th dose will be inoculated 1 month after the 4th dose. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-22BP | Biological | During the injection of IL-22BP, there were two dose groups, namely 25 μg and 50 μg of mRNA, with three participants in each dose group, aiming to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the IL-22BP. The treatment will be administered by intratumoral injection. Enrolled subjects will receive inoculations of IL22BP injection according to their respective dose groups, which include 5 doses for basic immunization. During the basic immunization, the first 4 doses will be given at an interval of 1 week each, and the 5th dose will be inoculated 1 month after the 4th dose. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants with DLT and Treatment-Related Adverse Event | Evaluate the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity during the treatment with IL-22BP formulation and the treatment-related adverse reactions. | Participation in the whole process of the study. The time window was typically 2 months. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Response Rate | It refers to the proportion of patients whose tumors have shrunk to a certain extent and remained so for a certain period of time. It is a direct indicator to measure the anti-tumor activity of drugs.It is usually calculated as the percentage of the sum of the number of patients with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) in the total number of patients. | From the time when the patients were enrolled in the study until one month after the last dose of the IL-22BP was injected.The time window was typically 2 months. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xingchen Peng | Contact | 18980606753 | pxx2014@163.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Radiation Oncology | Recruiting | Chengdu | Sichuan | 610000 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33538338 | Background | Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4. | |
| 33843999 | Background | Gersten O, Barbieri M. Evaluation of the Cancer Transition Theory in the US, Select European Nations, and Japan by Investigating Mortality of Infectious- and Noninfectious-Related Cancers, 1950-2018. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e215322. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5322. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C415369 | interleukin-22 receptor |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Disease Control Rate | It refers to the proportion of patients whose tumors have shrunk or remained stable. It reflects the control of tumor growth by treatment, including tumor shrinkage (as involved in ORR) and the situation where the tumor does not progress.It is calculated as the percentage of the sum of the number of patients with complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD) in the total number of patients. | From the time when the patients were enrolled in the study until one month after the last dose of the IL-22BP was injected.The time window was typically 2 months. |
| Time to first complete remission, partial remission on treatment with IL-22BP preparation. | Complete Response: All target lesions disappear, no new lesions emerge, and tumor markers return to normal. This means that, from the perspective of imaging and relevant examinations, the tumor has completely vanished, and the patient's condition has achieved the most ideal improvement. For example, in the treatment of lymphoma, if enlarged lymph nodes completely disappear as detected by imaging examinations such as PET-CT, and relevant tumor markers in the blood also return to normal, it can be judged as a complete response. Partial Response: The sum of the maximum diameters of target lesions is reduced by ≥ 30%, and no new lesions appear. Taking lung cancer as an example, if the sum of the maximum diameters of lung tumors is reduced by more than 30% after treatment and no new tumor lesions are detected, it is in a partial response state. This situation indicates that the tumor responds to the treatment and the patient's condition is under a certain degree of control. | From the time when the patients were enrolled in the study until one month after the last dose of the IL-22BP was injected.The time window was typically 2 months. |
| Duration of Response | It is defined as the time between the first confirmation of complete response, partial response and the first disease progression or death from any cause. | From the time when the patients were enrolled in the study until one month after the last dose of the IL-22BP was injected.The time window was typically 2 months. |
| Progression - Free Survival(PFS) | Defined as the time between first treatment with IL-22BP and first disease progression or death from any cause progression or death from any cause. | From the time when the patients were enrolled in the study until three months after the last dose of the IL-22BP was injected. The time window was typically 6 months. |
| Overall Survival(OS) | OS defined as time from first treatment with IL-22BP to death from any cause. | From the time when the patients were enrolled in the study until six months after the last dose of the IL-22BP was injected. The time window was typically 8 months. |
| West China Hospital of Sichuan University | Recruiting | Chengdu | Sichuan | 610000 | China |
|
| 32585307 | Background | Kempski J, Giannou AD, Riecken K, Zhao L, Steglich B, Lucke J, Garcia-Perez L, Karstens KF, Wostemeier A, Nawrocki M, Pelczar P, Witkowski M, Nilsson S, Konczalla L, Shiri AM, Kempska J, Wahib R, Brockmann L, Huber P, Gnirck AC, Turner JE, Zazara DE, Arck PC, Stein A, Simon R, Daubmann A, Meiners J, Perez D, Strowig T, Koni P, Kruglov AA, Sauter G, Izbicki JR, Guse AH, Rosch T, Lohse AW, Flavell RA, Gagliani N, Huber S. IL22BP Mediates the Antitumor Effects of Lymphotoxin Against Colorectal Tumors in Mice and Humans. Gastroenterology. 2020 Oct;159(4):1417-1430.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.06.033. Epub 2020 Jun 22. |
| 34394960 | Background | Hou X, Zaks T, Langer R, Dong Y. Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery. Nat Rev Mater. 2021;6(12):1078-1094. doi: 10.1038/s41578-021-00358-0. Epub 2021 Aug 10. |
| 35701851 | Background | Kiaie SH, Majidi Zolbanin N, Ahmadi A, Bagherifar R, Valizadeh H, Kashanchi F, Jafari R. Recent advances in mRNA-LNP therapeutics: immunological and pharmacological aspects. J Nanobiotechnology. 2022 Jun 14;20(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12951-022-01478-7. |