Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Individuals with rare genetic conditions may experience a delay or loss of developmental skills. Many have limited verbal speech. The aim of this clinical trial is to examine how well a speech-generating device supports the communication skills of participants with a rare genetic condition. The speech-generating device is a communication program loaded onto an iPad.
This is a crossover trial, meaning that each participant will receive both the treatment (device) and a control (usual care; no device) phase. The order in which each participant receives the device versus the usual care (no device) will depend on which group the participant is assigned to. The changes in communication in each phase will then be compared.
During the trial, participants can expect to complete a series of assessments and attend a total of 2 x 1-hour therapy session per week for 6 weeks.
In Australia, a disease is considered rare if it affects less than 1 in 2,000 individuals. There are over 7,000 rare genetic conditions, with three quarters affecting children. Rare diseases are often serious and progressive, presenting with ongoing health and developmental challenges, including speech and language disorders.
Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) is one of the ways to support children with little speech and children with rare genetic conditions should have access to such tools as early as possible to maximise learning opportunities. However, the efficacy of high-tech AAC methods, such as speech generating devices, for children with rare genetic conditions have not been rigorously examined.
In this randomised cross-over trial, 38 participants with a rare genetic condition will be randomised into two groups (n=19 per group), which will determine the sequence of treatment delivery. The primary aim of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of implementing a speech-generating device on communication outcomes compared with their usual care (i.e. no device). Change in communication will be measured using a patient-defined outcome - this outcome is a 'communicative act' chosen at the beginning of the trial with participants and their family. This means that each participant will have an individualised communication outcome which will be targeted during treatment sessions and measured in assessment sessions. The secondary aims include parent-reported communication, family impact and language/communication competence.
Each participant will complete screening, preference testing and baseline assessments about 2-4 weeks before randomisation. Further assessments will be completed before and after each phase. For each participant, the change in assessment scores between the start and the end of each period will be calculated. The mean difference in the change in total score between the two periods will then be calculated.
Each participant is expected to be involved in the study for 12 weeks after randomisation. This is split into two phases (6 weeks each). In the treatment (device) phase, each participant will receive two 1-hour therapy sessions per week, for 6 weeks, with a communication device (or 12 x 1-hour therapy within a 6-week treatment phase). The device is implemented by a qualified speech pathologist on the project team and can occur at Murdoch Children's Research Institute or at the participants' home.
The control (usual care) phase involves another 6 weeks, however, no therapy sessions are provided by the project team. Weekly phone-call or telehealth check-ins will be performed to ensure things are going smoothly.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment then Control | Other | The arm receives the intervention (device), then the control |
|
| Control then Treatment | Other | The arm receives the control, then the treatment (device) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speech-generating device | Device | The device is an iPad loaded with a grid-based and speech-generating communication application - a suitable application for the participant is determined at the beginning of the trial. This device is used in all 12 therapy sessions and implemented by a qualified speech pathologist in a natural, play-based setting. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in the frequency of target communicative act related to the patient-defined outcome determined at the beginning of the trial | Each participant will have specific communicative acts related to a patient-defined outcome determined at the beginning of the trial with each participant and their family. This means that each participant will have an individualised communication outcome which will be targeted during treatment sessions. The change in frequency of these specific communicative acts will be measured. The mean difference of each period (comparing the start to end of the phase) will be determined and compared between the 2 periods. | Baseline, Week 0, Week 6 and Week 12 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in overall communicative acts | Changes in overall communicative acts measured through the difference in total number of all communicative acts observed between the two periods. This will be measured by the overall number of communicative acts observed during an assessment session regardless of the relation to the patient-defined outcome. The change in the total score between the start and the end of each period will be calculated for each participant. The mean difference in the change in total score between the two periods will then be calculated. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angela T Morgan | Contact | +61 (03) 8341 6458 | angela.morgan@mcri.edu.au | |
| Shui J Wong | Contact | +61 (03) 9345 5533 | jen.wong@mcri.edu.au |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Murdoch Children's Research Institute | Recruiting | Melbourne | Victoria | Australia |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28922953 | Background | Ganz JB, Morin KL, Foster MJ, Vannest KJ, Genc Tosun D, Gregori EV, Gerow SL. High-technology augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and complex communication needs: a meta-analysis. Augment Altern Commun. 2017 Dec;33(4):224-238. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2017.1373855. Epub 2017 Sep 19. | |
| 12033746 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Conditions that cause childhood dementia | View source |
Not provided
The de-identified data set collected for the analysis of this trial will be made available 12 months following analysis and publication of the primary outcome. The following will be made available long-term for use by future researchers from a recognised research institution:
12 months after publication of primary outcome
Interested researchers may request access to the data by submitting a formal data sharing request to the Sponsor. The request will be reviewed by the Sponsor and the Sponsor-Investigator, and any relevant Murdoch Children's Research Institute (MCRI) data sharing committee, considering factors such as scientific merit, data security, and adherence to the approved research objectives. The data may be obtained from MCRI by emailing mctc@mcri.edu.au
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
As well as the outcome assessments, research assistants completing coding/rating and integrity/reliability assessments will be blinded.
|
|
| Control | Other | Participants will continue their current model of care. This means that if participants are receiving speech therapy locally, they may continue to do so given that no speech-generating device is introduced or used during this time. Participants will check in with the researching clinician at least once a week via telehealth or phone call - the aim is to stay in contact with families and reduce loss to follow-up. The clinician will also monitor treatment integrity and document any differences that may be present during this phase. |
|
|
| Baseline, Week 0, Week 6 and Week 12 |
| Changes in parent-reported communication via the Communication Matrix total score | Changes in parent-reported communication skills will be measured using the Communication Matrix total score. For each participant the change in the total score between the start and the end of each period will be calculated. The mean difference in the total score between the two periods will then be calculated. The Communication Matrix allows for the quantification of reported behaviours, e.g. the total score is calculated by scoring each cell in the Matrix (each cell representing a communication behaviour at a particular level of communication). Each cell is scored with 0 (Not used), 1 (Emerging - inconsistently used) or 2 (Mastered - used proficiently at all times). These points are summed to obtain a score between 0 to 160 and a percentage is obtained to represent the proportion of communication behaviours Mastered. | Baseline, Week 0, Week 6 and Week 12 |
| Changes in family and caregiver impact assessed via the Family Impact of Assistive Technology Scale for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (FIATS-AAC) | Changes in parent satisfaction, social impact and the mental health of caregivers will be assessed using the Family Impact of Assistive Technology Scale for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (FIATS-AAC). Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale and assigned into one of the 13 domains (Behavior, Caregiver Relief, Contentment, Doing Activities, Education, Energy, Face-to-Face Communication, Family Roles, Finances, Security, Self Reliance, Social Versatility, Supervision). The mean score for each domain (ranging between 1 to 7) are added together to produce the total score (ranging between 13 to 91). A higher domain score suggests a higher (more positive) functional level of that specific domain. The change in scores between the start and the end of each period will be calculated for each participant. The mean difference in the score between the two periods will then be calculated. | Baseline, Week 0, Week 6 and Week 12 |
| Changes in family and caregiver impact assessed via semi-structured interviews | Changes in parent satisfaction, social impact and the mental health of caregivers will be assessed using a semi-structured interview as seen in Vogel et al. (2016), completed at baseline and at the end of each phase. Thematic analysis will be used to identify any themes that are present during these interviews and descriptively compare the differences identified. | Baseline, Week 6 and Week 12 |
| Changes in Language / Communication Competence assessed via the Low-Verbal Investigatory Survey | Changes in the language and communication competence between the start and the end of each period for each participant will be determined via the Low-Verbal Investigatory Survey (LVIS). The survey produces a Verbal Communication score (between 0 to 15), an Alternative Communication score (between 0 to 11) and a Nonverbal Communication score (between 0 to 5). A higher score suggests greater communication competence in each of those areas. The mean differences in the LVIS scores between the two periods will then be calculated. | Baseline, Week 0, Week 6 and Week 12 |
| Nunn K, Williams K, Ouvrier R. The Australian Childhood Dementia Study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002 Apr;11(2):63-70. doi: 10.1007/s007870200012. |
| 30952185 | Background | Light J, McNaughton D. Communicative Competence for Individuals who require Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A New Definition for a New Era of Communication? Augment Altern Commun. 2014 Mar;30(1):1-18. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2014.885080. |
| 37471493 | Background | Elvidge KL, Christodoulou J, Farrar MA, Tilden D, Maack M, Valeri M, Ellis M, Smith NJC; Childhood Dementia Working Group. The collective burden of childhood dementia: a scoping review. Brain. 2023 Nov 2;146(11):4446-4455. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad242. |
| Global research inequity and opportunities for childhood dementia | View source |
| Word Health Organisation: Global report on assistive technology | View source |
| Rare Voices Australia (RVA) for Australians living with a rare disease | View source |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D009633 | Nonverbal Communication |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D003142 | Communication |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided