Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Prepectoral Immediate One-Stage Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction Versus Two-Stage Expander/Prosthesis Reconstruction in Postoperative Adjuvant Radiotherapy Breast Cancer Patients
This study is a prospective, double-cohort study. It plans to enroll more than 104 patients with cT1-3N0-3M0 breast cancer for immediate prepectoral muscle prosthesis reconstruction or two-step breast reconstruction with expander/prosthesis, and they will receive postoperative radiotherapy. Record the changes of BREAST-Q scores of the patients before and after the operation, as well as information such as postoperative complications and capsular contracture.
The primary endpoint was the BREAST-Q score at 12 months after the operation. The secondary endpoints included the success rate of breast reconstruction, surgical complications, cosmetic effects of the breast evaluated by doctors, the occurrence of capsular contracture, nipple and skin sensation, and tumor safety.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate One-Stage Prepectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction Cohort | Patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) or skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction are eligible for inclusion, regardless of mesh use (with or without mesh). Approaches including open, endoscopic, or robotic techniques are acceptable, provided that adjuvant radiotherapy is administered after permanent implant placement. |
| |
| Delayed-Immediate Two-Stage Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction Cohort | Patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) or skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with two-stage expander/implant breast reconstruction are eligible, provided that: Expander placement may be either prepectoral or subpectoral, Mesh use is optional (with or without acellular dermal matrix), Radiotherapy is administered with the expander in situ, Permanent implant exchange is performed ≥6 months after completing radiotherapy, The implant exchange procedure permits any approach (open, endoscopic, or robotic) and any plane/mesh configuration (prepectoral/subpectoral, with/without mesh). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breast Reconstruction Surgery | Procedure | Breast Reconstruction Surgery (either immediate one-stage prepectoral implant reconstruction or two-stage expander/implant reconstruction) with postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| BREAST-Q (Breast Reconstruction Module) Scores | This trial collects patient-reported outcomes through four domains of the BREAST-Q Breast Reconstruction Module: Satisfaction with Breasts, Psychosocial Well-being, Physical Well-being, Sexual Well-being. Scores are assessed preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively. The BREAST-Q score at 12 months post-surgery serves as the primary endpoint. | Preoperatively and at 1 Year Postoperatively |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Breast Reconstruction Failure Rate | Breast Reconstruction Failure Rate: Defined as the proportion of patients requiring implant removal due to complications among all patients undergoing breast reconstruction. Implant Removal Due to Complications: Refers to explantation occurring within 12 months postoperatively attributed to any of the following surgery-related complications: Hematoma, Seroma, Flap necrosis, Nipple-areolar complex (NAC) necrosis, Surgical site infection, Wound dehiscence, Implant exposure, Baker grade III/IV capsular contracture, Implant malposition/displacement. Exclusion Criterion: Implant removals requested by patients without objective surgery-related complications (i.e., subjectively motivated explantations) must be documented separately and excluded from failure rate calculations. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Treatment-naïve women with unilateral primary breast cancer (clinical stage cT1-3N0-3M0) scheduled for immediate prepectoral direct-to-implant reconstruction OR tissue expander/implant two-stage reconstruction, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| xiuchun Chen | Contact | 18603719919 | cxc701024@163.com | |
| minhao Lv | Contact | 13838392355 | lvminhao2004628@163.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| xiuchun chen | Henan Cancer Hospital | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henan cacer hospital | Recruiting | Henan | Henan | 450008 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33890886 | Result | Kraenzlin F, Chopra K, Kokosis G, Venturi ML, Mesbahi A, Nahabedian MY. Revision Breast Reconstruction with Prepectoral Pocket Conversion of Submuscular Breast Implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 May 1;147(5):743e-748e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007885. | |
| 29346711 | Result | Chatterjee A, Nahabedian MY, Gabriel A, Macarios D, Parekh M, Wang F, Griffin L, Sigalove S. Early assessment of post-surgical outcomes with pre-pectoral breast reconstruction: A literature review and meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2018 May;117(6):1119-1130. doi: 10.1002/jso.24938. Epub 2018 Jan 18. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 1 Year Postoperatively |
| Complication Profile: | Includes but not limited to: Hematoma, Poor Wound Healing, Flap Necrosis, Surgical Site Infection, Wound Dehiscence, Fat Grafting-Associated Complications. All complications must be graded according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification System, then systematically assessed and documented. | 1 Year Postoperatively |
| Physician-Assessed Aesthetic Outcome | Evaluated by surgeons independent of the operating team using the Harris Scale to grade the aesthetic outcome of the reconstructed breast based on standardized patient photographs. | 1 Year Postoperatively |
| Capsular Contracture Assessment | Evaluated using the Baker Classification System (Spear & Baker, 1995). | 1 Year Postoperatively |
| Nipple and Skin Sensation Assessment | Tactile sensation is evaluated using the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Examination (SWME). | 1 Year Postoperatively |
| Oncological Safety Endpoints: Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS). | DFS: Time interval from the date of surgery to the occurrence of any recurrence (local/regional/distant metastasis), new primary breast cancer, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Patients without events are censored at the last documented disease-free follow-up. OS: Time interval from the date of surgery to death from any cause. Living patients are censored at the last confirmed survival follow-up. | 5 Year Postoperatively |
| 31913902 | Result | Li Y, Xu G, Yu N, Huang J, Long X. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Oct;85(4):437-447. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002190. |
| 30842930 | Result | Sigalove S. Prepectoral breast reconstruction and radiotherapy-a closer look. Gland Surg. 2019 Feb;8(1):67-74. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.01.01. |
| 29166343 | Result | Gabriel A, Maxwell GP. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in Challenging Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):14S-21S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004046. |
| 34307092 | Result | Chopra S, Al-Ishaq Z, Vidya R. The Journey of Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction through Time. World J Plast Surg. 2021 May;10(2):3-13. doi: 10.29252/wjps.10.2.3. |
| 23096982 | Result | Clemens MW, Kronowitz SJ. Acellular dermal matrix in irradiated tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction: evidence-based review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Nov;130(5 Suppl 2):27S-34S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318265f690. |
| 15114121 | Result | Kronowitz SJ, Hunt KK, Kuerer HM, Babiera G, McNeese MD, Buchholz TA, Strom EA, Robb GL. Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 May;113(6):1617-28. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000117192.54945.88. |
| 30589770 | Result | Sbitany H, Gomez-Sanchez C, Piper M, Lentz R. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy: An Assessment of Clinical Outcomes and Benefits. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jan;143(1):10-20. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005140. |
| 25068325 | Result | Garza RM, Paik KJ, Chung MT, Duscher D, Gurtner GC, Longaker MT, Wan DC. Studies in fat grafting: Part III. Fat grafting irradiated tissue--improved skin quality and decreased fat graft retention. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Aug;134(2):249-257. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000326. |
| 22286412 | Result | Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL. The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Feb;129(2):293-302. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31823aec6b. |
| 29414263 | Result | Voineskos SH, Nelson JA, Klassen AF, Pusic AL. Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes: Key Metrics in Reconstructive Surgery. Annu Rev Med. 2018 Jan 29;69:467-479. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-060116-022831. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011827 | Radiation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055585 | Physical Phenomena |
Not provided
Not provided