Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic assisted breast resection with preservation of nipple and areola, combined with chest muscle anterior prosthesis and patch for immediate one-step breast reconstruction and concurrent autologous fat transplantation in a prospective study
This study is a prospective, single center, single arm clinical trial. It is planned to recruit 29 patients with unilateral breast cancer of cT1-2N0M0. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria are planned to undergo laparoscopic assisted NSM+prosthesis combined with patch breast reconstruction and concurrent fat transplantation surgery.
Main endpoint of the study: incidence of severe complications after breast reconstruction surgery.
Secondary study endpoints: BREAST-Q (Breast Reconstruction Module) score, breast reconstruction success rate, incidence of all complications, physician evaluated breast cosmetic outcomes, occurrence of capsule contractures, nipple areola and breast skin sensation, and tumor safety.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic assisted NSM+breast reconstruction+simultaneous fat transplantation | Experimental | Endoscopic assisted NSM+prosthesis combined with patch for anterior breast reconstruction and simultaneous fat transplantation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic assisted NSM+breast reconstruction+simultaneous fat transplantation | Procedure | Laparoscopic assisted mastectomy with preservation of nipple and areola, combined with chest muscle anterior prosthesis and patch, immediate one-step breast reconstruction and simultaneous autologous fat transplantation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of serious complications after breast reconstruction surgery | All surgical related complications (including hematoma, poor wound healing, skin flap necrosis, infection, incision dehiscence, fat injection related complications, etc.) are classified according to the Clavien Dindo scoring system. The Clavien Dindo grading system is based on the severity of postoperative complications and whether corresponding treatment is needed for the complications. Postoperative complications are classified into grades I-V, and those classified as grade III or above by Clavien Dindo are considered serious complications. | One week after surgery, one month after surgery, three months after surgery, six months after surgery, and one year after surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| BREAST-Q (Breast Reconstruction Module) score | This experiment obtained subject report results from four dimensions of breast satisfaction, psychological health, physical health, and sexual health using the BREAST-Q (Breast Reconstruction Module) scoring system. BREAST-Q scoring was performed at preoperative, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12-month follow-up. The BREAST-Q score at 12 months after surgery is the main evaluation metric. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| xiuchun Chen | Contact | 18603719919 | cxc701024@163.com | |
| minhao Lv | Contact | 13838392355 | zlyylvminhao2789@zzu.edu.cn |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| xiuchun chen | Henan Cancer Hospital | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henan Cancer Hospital | Recruiting | Zhengzhou | Henan | 450000 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33890886 | Result | Kraenzlin F, Chopra K, Kokosis G, Venturi ML, Mesbahi A, Nahabedian MY. Revision Breast Reconstruction with Prepectoral Pocket Conversion of Submuscular Breast Implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 May 1;147(5):743e-748e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007885. | |
| 29346711 | Result | Chatterjee A, Nahabedian MY, Gabriel A, Macarios D, Parekh M, Wang F, Griffin L, Sigalove S. Early assessment of post-surgical outcomes with pre-pectoral breast reconstruction: A literature review and meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2018 May;117(6):1119-1130. doi: 10.1002/jso.24938. Epub 2018 Jan 18. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| BREAST-Q scoring was performed at preoperative, postoperative 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up |
| Success rate of breast reconstruction | Calculation formula:The result of subtracting the number of implant removal cases caused by complications from the total number of breast reconstruction cases received, divided by the total number of reconstruction cases received.Definition of implant removal caused by complications: Refers to the removal of implants during the 12-month follow-up period due to surgical related reasons such as hematoma, serum swelling, skin flap necrosis, nipple areola necrosis, infection, incision dehiscence, implant exposure, capsule contraction, and prosthesis displacement. | One year after surgery |
| All incidence of complications | Complications such as hematoma, poor wound healing, skin flap necrosis, infection, incision dehiscence, and fat injection related complications are classified according to the Clavien Dindo scoring system, including grades I-V, and evaluated and recorded. | On the day of surgery, one week after surgery, one month after surgery, three months after surgery, six months after surgery, and one year after surgery |
| Breast cosmetic effects evaluated by doctors | The cosmetic effect of breast reconstruction is evaluated by professional doctors independent of the surgeon using the ueda scoring criteria based on patient photos. | Before surgery,on the day of surgery, one months after surgery,three months after surgery, six months after surgery, and one year after surgery |
| Occurrence of capsule contraction | The Baker classification method (Spear&Baker, 1995) was used for evaluation. | one months after surgery,three months after surgery, six months after surgery, and one year after surgery |
| Nipple, areola, and breast skin sensation | The Semmes Weinstein single filament inspection method was used to measure tactile sensation. Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Inspection Method | Before surgery, one week after surgery, one months after surgery,three months after surgery, six months after surgery, and one year after surgery |
| Tumor safety | Disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). DFS defines the time from surgery to the occurrence of recurrence, metastasis, or last follow-up. OS defines the time from surgery to patient death or last follow-up. | five years after surgery |
| 31913902 | Result | Li Y, Xu G, Yu N, Huang J, Long X. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Oct;85(4):437-447. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002190. |
| 37253841 | Result | Feng Y, Liang F, Wen N, Yang H, Zhou J, Zhang S, Liu X, Qiu M, Xie Y, Du Z. An Innovative and Highly Efficient Single-Port Endoscopic Nipple-/Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Dual-Plane Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Study from a Single Institution. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Mar;48(6):1133-1141. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03402-2. Epub 2023 May 30. |
| 31176887 | Result | Mok CW, Lai HW. Endoscopic-assisted surgery in the management of breast cancer: 20 years review of trend, techniques and outcomes. Breast. 2019 Aug;46:144-156. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.05.013. Epub 2019 May 20. |
| 36695902 | Result | Wang ZH, Gao GX, Liu WH, Wu SS, Xie F, Xu W, Ding GQ, Xu YQ, Zhang ZT, Qu X. Single-port nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction for breast cancer. Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3842-3851. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09862-6. Epub 2023 Jan 25. |
| 31256950 | Result | Li L, Su Y, Xiu B, Huang X, Chi W, Hou J, Zhang Y, Tian J, Wang J, Wu J. Comparison of prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomies: A systematic review and meta analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;45(9):1542-1550. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.05.015. Epub 2019 May 14. |
| 32514624 | Result | Abbate O, Rosado N, Sobti N, Vieira BL, Liao EC. Meta-analysis of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: guide to patient selection and current outcomes. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Aug;182(3):543-554. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05722-2. Epub 2020 Jun 9. |
| 36245049 | Result | Ostapenko E, Nixdorf L, Devyatko Y, Exner R, Wimmer K, Fitzal F. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jan;30(1):126-136. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12567-0. Epub 2022 Oct 16. |
| 28740781 | Result | Rancati AO, Angrigiani CH, Hammond DC, Nava MB, Gonzalez EG, Dorr JC, Gercovich GF, Rocco N, Rostagno RL. Direct to Implant Reconstruction in Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: Patient Selection by Preoperative Digital Mammogram. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Jun 20;5(6):e1369. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001369. eCollection 2017 Jun. |
| 30842930 | Result | Sigalove S. Prepectoral breast reconstruction and radiotherapy-a closer look. Gland Surg. 2019 Feb;8(1):67-74. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.01.01. |
| 31133371 | Result | Sorrentino L, Regolo L, Scoccia E, Petrolo G, Bossi D, Albasini S, Caruso A, Vanna R, Morasso C, Mazzucchelli S, Truffi M, Corsi F. Autologous fat transfer after breast cancer surgery: An exact-matching study on the long-term oncological safety. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;45(10):1827-1834. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.05.013. Epub 2019 May 21. |
| 35196670 | Result | Gronovich Y, Winder G, Maisel-Lotan A, Lysy I, Sela E, Spiegel G, Carmon M, Hadar T, Elami A, Eizenman N, Binenboym R. Hybrid Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant and Autologous Fat Graft Simultaneously in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Single Surgeon's Experience with 25 Breasts in 15 Consecutive Cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Mar 1;149(3):386e-391e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008879. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided