Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Trudell Medical International | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Title:
Comparison of Effectiveness Between Active Cycle of Breathing Techniques (ACBT) and Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP, Aerobika) Device Assisted Treatment in Patients With Bronchiectasis in Korea: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Purpose:
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Active Cycle of Breathing Techniques (ACBT) alone versus ACBT combined with an Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) device (Aerobika) in patients with bronchiectasis. The goal is to determine whether the combination therapy reduces the frequency of acute exacerbations and improves patient symptoms compared to ACBT alone.
Primary Questions:
Does the use of ACBT plus Aerobika reduce the number of acute exacerbations in patients with bronchiectasis who experience ≥3 exacerbations per year?
What symptoms and adverse events are observed in participants using the Aerobika device?
Study Design:
This is a single-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted at Chungbuk National University Hospital in Korea. 100 adult patients diagnosed with bronchiectasis and having ≥3 acute exacerbations within 1 year will be enrolled and randomized into two groups (1:1):
Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) group
Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) and Oscillatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) group
The intervention period lasts 12 months, with clinic visits scheduled at 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Participation Involves:
Use of ACBT with or without Aerobika daily for 12 months
In-person clinic visits every 1 to 3 months
Monthly phone follow-ups to assess symptoms and adverse events
Completion of questionnaires (mMRC, BHQ, CAT) and clinical tests including PFT and laboratory tests
Tracking of exacerbation frequency, sputum volume, and quality
Primary Questions:
Does the use of ACBT plus Aerobika reduce the number of acute exacerbations in patients with bronchiectasis who experience ≥3 exacerbations per year?
Answer) To date, no studies have demonstrated that the use of ACBT plus Aerobika reduces acute exacerbations in patients with bronchiectasis who experience frequent exacerbations.
What symptoms and adverse events are observed in participants using the Aerobika device?
Answer) Oscillating PEP devices are not recommended in patients with neuromuscular weakness, recent head and neck surgery or trauma, active hemoptysis, untreated pneumothorax, and middle ear disease
Ref. Coppolo DP, Schloss J, Suggett JA, Mitchell JP. Non-Pharmaceutical Techniques for Obstructive Airway Clearance Focusing on the Role of Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP): A Narrative Review. Pulm Ther. (2022) 8:1-41.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) group | Active Comparator | patients with bronchiectasis using ACBT |
|
| Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) and Oscillatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) group | Experimental | Patients with bronchiectasis using ACBT and OPEP simultaneously |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) and Oscillatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) group | Device | Patients with bronchiectasis using ACT and OPEP simultaneously |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency of Acute Exacerbations in Patients with Bronchiectasis | Number of acute exacerbations experienced by patients diagnosed with bronchiectasis during the 12-month study period. | 12 months from baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement in subjective symptoms (1) | Evaluation of reductions from baseline in patients' self-reported symptoms (using Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale score) assessed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (range: 0-4; higher scores indicate worse dyspnea) | Subjective symptoms: 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bumhee Yang, MD, PhD | Contact | +82 43-269-8210 | ybhworld0415@gmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chungbuk National University Hospital | Cheongju-si | North Chungcheong | 28644 | South Korea |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37250647 | Background | Kim SR, Kim SH, Kim GH, Cho JY, Choi H, Lee H, Ra SW, Lee KM, Choe KH, Oh YM, Shin YM, Yang B. Effectiveness of the use of an oscillating positive expiratory pressure device in bronchiectasis with frequent exacerbations: a single-arm pilot study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 12;10:1159227. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1159227. eCollection 2023. | |
| 32042786 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | May 22, 2025 | Jun 3, 2025 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Active Cycle of Breathing Technique (ACBT) group | Device | Patients will receive only ACBT for airway clearance. |
|
| Improvement in subjective symptoms (2) |
Evaluation of changes from baseline in patients' self-reported symptoms (using Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire (BHQ) score) assessed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (range: 0-100; higher scores indicate better health status or quality of life) |
| Subjective symptoms: 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline |
| Improvement in subjective symptoms (3) | Evaluation of reductions from baseline in patients' self-reported symptoms (using COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score) assessed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (range: 0-40; higher scores indicate worse health status or greater impact of COPD symptoms) | Subjective symptoms: 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from baseline |
| Improvement in objective assessment | Evaluation of changes from baseline in patients' pulmonary function, specifically Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) measured in liters (L), at 12 months. | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) measured in liters (L): 12 months from baseline |
| Improvement in objective assessment | Evaluation of changes from baseline in patients' pulmonary function, specifically Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) expressed as a percentage of predicted value (FVC %), measured at 12 months. | Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) expressed as a percentage of predicted value (FVC %): 12 months from baseline |
| Improvement in objective assessment | Evaluation of changes from baseline in patients' pulmonary function, specifically Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) measured in liters (L), at 12 months. | Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) measured in liters (L): 12 months from baseline |
| Improvement in objective assessment | Evaluation of changes from baseline in patients' pulmonary function, specifically Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) expressed as a percentage of predicted value (FEV1 %), measured at 12 months. | Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) expressed as a percentage of predicted value (FEV1 %): 12 months from baseline |
| Improvement in objective assessment | Evaluation of changes from baseline in patients' pulmonary function, specifically the ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second to Forced Vital Capacity (FEV1/FVC), measured at 12 months. | the ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second to Forced Vital Capacity (FEV1/FVC): 12 months from baseline |
| Yang B, Choi H, Lim JH, Park HY, Kang D, Cho J, Lee JS, Lee SW, Oh YM, Moon JY, Kim SH, Kim TH, Sohn JW, Yoon HJ, Lee H. The disease burden of bronchiectasis in comparison with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a national database study in Korea. Ann Transl Med. 2019 Dec;7(23):770. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.11.55. |
| 30442957 | Background | Chalmers JD, Chang AB, Chotirmall SH, Dhar R, McShane PJ. Bronchiectasis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018 Nov 15;4(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s41572-018-0042-3. |
| 30545985 | Background | Hill AT, Sullivan AL, Chalmers JD, De Soyza A, Elborn SJ, Floto AR, Grillo L, Gruffydd-Jones K, Harvey A, Haworth CS, Hiscocks E, Hurst JR, Johnson C, Kelleher PW, Bedi P, Payne K, Saleh H, Screaton NJ, Smith M, Tunney M, Whitters D, Wilson R, Loebinger MR. British Thoracic Society Guideline for bronchiectasis in adults. Thorax. 2019 Jan;74(Suppl 1):1-69. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212463. No abstract available. |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001987 | Bronchiectasis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001982 | Bronchial Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided