Minimally Invasive Interval Debulking Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Minimally Invasive Interval Debulking Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer, a Prospective Observational Study

In women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AOC), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) combined with interval cytoreductive surgery and post-operative chemotherapy is an option.

Several retrospective studies have demonstrated the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery in case of a good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and prospective randomised trial is currently underway to demonstrate the non-inferiority of minimally invasive surgery compared to laparotomy in patients with an optimal response after 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (LANCE trial, NCT04575935).

The aim of our study is to evaluate the feasibility of interval surgery after at least VI cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a minimally invasive approach.

In women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AOC), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) combined with interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) and post-operative chemotherapy is an option. Four randomised trials (EORTC55971, CHORUS, JCOG0602, SCORPION) have shown that survival rates after NACT are similar to those after primary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy.

The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has increased significantly in recent years, and it has been shown that the determining prognostic factor is the achievement of an absent residual tumour at surgery. However, the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles is not yet well defined. Several retrospective studies have evaluated the efficacy of interval debulking surgery after performing more than 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In these studies, the percentage of patients undergoing >4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy varied in a range of approximately 22% to 45%. Currently, several randomised trials are ongoing, evaluating the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles (3 vs. 6 cycles) in terms of complete cytoreduction (GOGER, NCT02125513) and survival (CHRONO, NCT03579394).

Several retrospective studies have demonstrated the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery in case of a good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (median neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles: 4). Therefore, a prospective randomised trial is currently underway to demonstrate the non-inferiority in terms of progression-free survival of minimally invasive surgery compared to laparotomy in patients with an optimal response after 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (LANCE trial, NCT04575935).

The aim of our study is to evaluate the feasibility of interval surgery after at least VI cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a minimally invasive approach.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Stage IIIC or IV high-grade invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma (serous, endometrioid, clear cell, transitional), primary peritoneal carcinoma, or fallopian tube carcinoma, or pathology consistent with high-grade Müllerian carcinoma.
• Partial or complete radiological response of abdominal cavity disease after at least 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
• CA125 < 100 U/mL.
• ECOG performance status 0-1.
• Signed informed consent and ability to comply with follow-up, including in cases where the patient has a legal guardian. In such cases, consent will be provided by the legal guardian.
• Review of imaging by a radiologist and senior surgeon at a multidisciplinary tumor board, particularly evaluating hepatic hilum involvement, mesenteric root, extensive peritoneal disease in the upper abdomen, extensive hepatic or gastric involvement, and extensive intestinal involvement.
• If all the previous criteria are met and protocol acceptance is obtained, the patient will undergo a laparoscopic evaluation of all abdominal quadrants to confirm the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Surgery will be considered feasible if complete gross resection can be achieved with minimally invasive surgery. If minimally invasive surgery is not feasible, the patient will be excluded from the study, and the reason for unfeasibility will be described.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Evidence of a tumor not amenable to minimally invasive complete resection on preoperative imaging (CT, PET-CT, or MRI). Radiologic criteria (tumor board evaluation): hepatic hilum involvement, mesentery root, extensive peritoneal disease in upper abdomen, extensive hepatic or gastric involvement, extensive intestinal involvement
• Disease free of other active malignancies within the past 5 years, except basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
• History of psychological, familial, sociological, or geographic conditions potentially impeding adherence to the study protocol and follow-up program
• Inability to tolerate prolonged Trendelenburg position or pneumoperitoneum