Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Centre Hospitalier Régional de la Citadelle | OTHER |
| SYSNAV | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To date, treatment options for knee osteoarthritis remain limited, and their clinical evaluation is complex due to the day-to-day fluctuations in symptoms.
Hospital tests provide a point-in-time measurement that is influenced by various factors (fatigue, recent activity, weather, etc.), making reliable assessment difficult. The aim of the study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of monitoring actual activity using the Syde® portable device in up to 30 subjects. Numerical variables derived from data collected by Syde® will be compared with conventional on-site clinical assessment criteria and with data from healthy participants, in order to identify a reliable and robust metric, thereby improving treatment evaluation and personalised patient management.
MAIN OBJECTIVES
Patients will have two visits: one at inclusion and a second two months later. They will wear Syde® magneto-inertial sensors, one on each ankle, for the month following the initial visit, then a Syde® sensor on the ankle and another on the wrist on the side of the non-dominant hand for the following month. The total duration of the recording period is two months.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES
To assess external validity
Assess ability to discriminate between groups
Collect qualitative data: Results of qualitative interviews on significant aspects of mobility and device acceptability
Identify a stiffness index: Ratio between outcome measurements after 0.5 - 1 - 2 or 3 hours of immobility (at least) for 10 minutes and the same outcome measured over the total recording period, excluding the 10-minute intervals.
Identify the best time of day for recording
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient with osteoarthritis of the knee | Active Comparator | Patients will have two visits: one at inclusion and a second two months later. They will wear Syde® magneto-inertial sensors, one on each ankle, for the month following the initial visit, then a Syde® sensor on the ankle and another on the wrist on the side of the non-dominant hand for the following month. The total duration of the recording period is two months. |
|
| Healthy Subjects | Active Comparator | Healthy subjects with similar age and BMI to patients with osteoarthritisof the knee |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Syde | Device | Actimyo/Syde is an innovative device intended to be used in a home-based environment. It is composed of two watch-like sensors, each containing a magneto-inertial sensors that record the linear acceleration, the angular velocity, the magnetic field of the movement in all directions.The two watches can be worn as wristwatch or placed near the ankle. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Total Recording Time Over 2 Months | Total number of hours recorded by the Syde® wearable device over a 2-month period. | 2 months |
| Median Daily Recording Time | Median number of hours recorded per day by the Syde® device over the 2-month period. | 2 months |
| Days to Reach 180 Recording Hours | Number of days required to reach 180 hours of recording, considered the optimal threshold for analysis. | 2 months |
| Intra-Class Correlation of Syde® Outcomes | Intra-Class Correlation (ICC) of each Syde® outcome calculated over slices of x hours (x = 10 to 90) of data per patient to assess reliability. | Entire recording period over 2 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation Between Syde® Variables and WOMAC 3.1 Scores | Spearman correlation between digital variables and WOMAC 3.1 scores at 2 months. | Baseline and 2 months |
| Correlation Between Syde® Variables and Timed Tests |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Laurent Servais, MD, PhD | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre de référence des maladies neuromusculaire (CRMN Liège), Hopital de la Citadelle | Liège | 4000 | Belgium |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| The Self-Paced 40-meter Walk Test (SPWT) | Diagnostic Test | Assesses walking speed over a fixed distance by having participants walk as quickly and safely as possible, but without running, along a 40-meter course. |
|
| 30-second chair stand test (30s-CST) | Diagnostic Test | It is a simple assessment of lower body strength and endurance. Participants are instructed to stand up and sit down from a chair as many times as possible in 30 seconds. |
|
| The Timed up and go test (TUG) | Diagnostic Test | During this standardized test, the subject is observed and timed while he/she rises from a chair, walks 3 meters, performs a 180° turn, walk back toward the chair and sits down. |
|
| Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC 3.1) | Diagnostic Test | The WOMAC is a widely used self-administered health status measure for evaluating pain, stiffness, and function in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. The WOMAC measures three separate dimensions: pain (5 questions), stiffness (2 questions) and function (17 questions). |
|
| Patient global impression of severity (PGI-S) | Diagnostic Test | The PGI-S is a patient-reported measure that evaluates the perceived severity of a condition based on a standardized scale, ranging from "none" to "very severe". |
|
| Pain Level Diary | Other | Patients will record their specific OAK average pain level during the day using the VAS scale of 0-10 points for one week at the beginning of each month of recording. |
|
| Qualitative Interview | Other | This interview is designed to better understand the patient's perspective on the impact of osteoarthritis of the knee on their motor function and to inform the selection of digital tools in upcoming clinical studies. |
|
Correlation between digital variables and results from 40 m self-paced test, 30 s chair stand test, and timed up and go test.
| Baseline and 2 months |
| Correlation Between Syde® Variables and Kellgren-Lawrence Grade | Spearman correlation between digital variables and Kellgren-Lawrence grade. | Baseline |
| Discriminative Power of Syde® Variables | Differences in Syde® outcomes between patients and controls, and among subgroups based on WOMAC 3.1 scores. | Entire recording period over 2 months |
| Qualitative Interview on Mobility and Usability | Qualitative data from interviews exploring mobility limitations, important measures, and impact on daily life. | Baseline and Month 2 |
| Stiffness Index Based on Immobility | Ratio of outcome measures after 0.5-3 hours of immobility (≥10 minutes) compared to full-day values excluding immobility periods. | Entire recording period over 2 months |
| Optimal Time of Day for Recording | Metric properties of outcomes calculated for various time windows (e.g., 1-11h, 2-12h) to assess morning stiffness and evening fatigue. | Entire recording period over 2 months |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided