Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the Fenestrated TREO Stent-Graft System works to treat abdominal aneurysms in adults. An abdominal aneurysm is a bulge in the main blood vessel (the aorta) which carries blood from the heart, through the chest and abdomen. It will also learn about the safety of Fenestrated TREO Stent-Graft System.
The main question it aims to answer is: Can the the Fenestrated TREO Stent-Graft System be used to treat participants with a specific type of abdominal aneurysm called a juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm?
Participants will: Have the the Fenestrated TREO Stent-Graft System implanted via an endovascular surgical procedure and visit the hospital for a follow up period of 5 years, for checkups, tests and imaging scans.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 - Roll-in Arm | Experimental | Minimum of 20 subjects (up to 30) with juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA), being treated with the Fenestrated TREO Stent-Graft System |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fenestrated TREO Stent Graft System | Device | The Fenestrated TREO Stent-Graft System is a modular, endoluminal, over-the-wire system intended for the endovascular treatment of juxtarenal and pararenal to paravisceral aneurysms requiring a fenestrated stent-graft and having suitable morphology. The system is composed of the following components: Fenestrated TREO Bifurcate Stent-Graft - The main body fenestrated bifurcate provides the following; proximal seal, fenestrations and gates for connection to the leg extensions. Bridging Stents - The bridging stent connects the main body bifurcated device to the target visceral artery allowing the target anatomy to maintain perfusion while keeping the pathology sealed TREO Leg and Straight Extension Stent-Grafts: The Leg Extension and Straight Extension stent-grafts are used to complete coverage of the pathology from the main body bifurcated device to the distal landing zones (usually the common iliac artery just proximal to the iliac bifurcation). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of patients with absence of a major adverse event (Primary Safety Endpoint) | The primary safety endpoint is the absence of a major adverse event (MAE) at 30-day post procedure. MAEs are defined as follows:
| 30-day post-procedure |
| Proportion of patients with successful aneurysm treatment through 12-months post-implant procedure (Primary Effectiveness Endpoint) | The primary effectiveness endpoint is the proportion of patients with successful aneurysm treatment through 12-months post-implant procedure, which is a composite of technical success and absence of the following:
| 12 months post-procedure |
| Successful delivery and deployment of the aortic stent-graft and all modular stent-graft components (Technical Success) | Composite:
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| All-Cause Mortality | Individual component of the primary safety endpoint - defined as death due to any cause | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
18 years or older at the time of consent
Life expectancy is greater than 2 years
An abdominal aortic or aorto-iliac aneurysm requiring a fenestrated graft and with morphology suitable for endovascular repair (confirmed by Computed Tomography (CT) with contrast performed within 6 months of planned implant procedure) as follows:
Proximal landing zone:
Distal (iliac) landing zone with:
Distal aortic diameter (above the iliac bifurcation) ≥70% of the sum of the iliac limb graft diameters
Minimum 18 mm aortic lumen diameter at the level of the fenestrations
Pathology that requires maximum 5 fenestrations in the main body
Pathology that requires fenestration a minimum 3 mm apart (edge to edge)
Branch vessels (to be bridged to the fenestrated graft) with:
Adequate renal function to tolerate contrast-enhanced CTA
Adequate vascular access compatible with required delivery systems
Willingness to comply with the follow-up evaluation schedule documented in a signed informed consent prior to implant
Exclusion Criteria:
Pregnant or lactating
Existing endovascular graft in the treated segment intended to be repaired with the Fenestrated TREO Stent-Graft System
Dissection in abdominal aorta, ruptured aneurysm, or symptomatic aneurysm (as determined by treating physician)
Implant procedure as planned does not allow for at least one patent hypogastric artery left intact, unless both are occluded on pre-op imaging.
A branch vessel(s) that is dissected or has significant calcification, tortuosity, thrombus formation that would interfere with bridging stent delivery or sealing (as determined by treating physician)
Severe untreated coronary artery disease and/or unstable angina, significant areas of myocardium at risk (based on coronary angiogram or radionuclide scans), left ventricular ejection fraction <20%, or recent diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF; as determined by treating physician).
Stroke or myocardial infarction within 6 months of the planned treatment date
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring routine need for oxygen therapy outside the hospital setting (e.g., daily or nightly home use)
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) stage ≥3b.*
* During Stage 2, patients with severe CKD (stage ≥3b) can be included in the Expanded Access Arm if otherwise eligible.
Active systemic infection or is suspected of having an active systemic infection (e.g., acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), sepsis)
Clinical conditions that would severely compromise or impair x-ray visualization of the aorta (as determined by treating physician).
History of an aortopathic connective tissue disease (e.g., Marfan's syndrome)
Mycotic aneurysm
Significant or circumferential calcification or mural thrombus (as determined by treating physician):
Cannot receive intraprocedural anticoagulation per the investigator's standard of care, or antiplatelet therapy post-procedurally as per the investigator's standard of care.
Blood coagulation disorder or bleeding diathesis, the treatment for which cannot be suspended pre- and post-repair
An investigational study drug or biologic within 30 days of planned procedure or an investigational device within one year of planned procedure or any other treatment that may interfere with the interpretation of the study results.
Medical, social or psychological issues that the investigator believes may interfere with study treatment or follow-up.
Untreatable allergy or sensitivity to contrast media, nitinol/nickel, Tantalum, Platinum Iridium (PtIr), 316 stainless steel, ePTFE (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene), PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) Impregnated polyester fiber, or polyester
Other major surgical or medical intervention within 45 days of the planned procedure or plan to undergo other major surgical or medical intervention within 45 days post implantation (e.g., coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), organ transplantation, renal stenting)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lauren Rider | Contact | 19545470374 | L.rider@terumoaortic.com | |
| Valerie Merkle | Contact | +1 954 838 9699 | v.merkle@terumoaortic.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Benjamin W Starnes, MD | University of Washington | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Health Memorial | Recruiting | Colorado Springs | Colorado | 80909 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38920026 | Background | Starnes BW, Zettervall S, Larimore A, Singh N. Long-Term Results of Physician-Modified Endografts for the Treatment of Elective, Symptomatic, and Ruptured Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Ann Surg. 2024 Oct 1;280(4):633-639. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006422. Epub 2024 Jun 26. | |
| 36978269 | Background | Tinelli G, Sica S, Sobocinski J, Ribreau Z, de Waure C, Ferraresi M, Snider F, Tshomba Y, Haulon S. Long-Term Propensity-Matched Comparison of Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair and Open Surgical Repair of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Dec;31(6):1208-1217. doi: 10.1177/15266028231162256. Epub 2023 Mar 28. |
Not provided
Not provided
Publications and presentations referring to the study will be coordinated by a Study Publication Committee overseen by the Sponsor. This committee will be responsible for the following activities: determining the scope of each publication; reviewing data provided by the Biostatistician; writing scientific papers or preparing presentation; submitting papers for publication or abstracts for conference/congress presentations. Decisions on IPD sharing will be taken as part of the study publication process.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017544 | Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001014 | Aortic Aneurysm |
| D000783 | Aneurysm |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Evaluated 30-days post procedure |
| Myocardial Infarction (new onset) |
Individual component of the primary safety endpoint - based on the SCAI definition |
| Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Respiratory failure | Individual component of the primary safety endpoint - respiratory failure requiring prolonged (>24 hours from anticipated) mechanical ventilation or reintubation | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Renal function decline | Individual component of the primary safety endpoint - Renal function decline resulting in >50% reduction from baseline eGFR or new-onset dialysis | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Bowel ischemia | Individual component of the primary safety endpoint - Bowel ischemia requiring surgical resection or not resolving with medical therapy | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Disabling stroke | Individual component of the primary safety endpoint - Disabling stroke (mRS score ≥2 at 90 days post event and an increase in ≥1 mRS category from an individual's pre-stroke baseline, as direct result of the neurological event) | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Paraplegia | Individual component of the primary safety endpoint -Paraplegia grade 3, as per SVS TEVAR guidelines | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Aneurysm-related mortality | Individual components of the primary effectiveness endpoint - defined as death which occurs within the first 30-days of the index procedure or a secondary intervention, OR any death that results from aneurysm rupture or an aorta-related complication (e.g., implant infection, occlusion, dissection) | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Aneurysm rupture | Individual components of the primary effectiveness endpoint - Rupture of the native aneurysm sac (treated lesion) | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Type I/III Endoleak | Individual components of the primary effectiveness endpoint - Presence of Type I/IIIEndoleak as confirmed by imaging | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Aneurysm Expansion | Individual components of the primary effectiveness endpoint - Aneurysm expansion (>5 mm) | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Device Migration | Individual components of the primary effectiveness endpoint - Device migration (>10mm) | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Loss of device patency | Individual components of the primary effectiveness endpoint - complete occlusion of the aortic implant and/or bridging stent(s) | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Conversion to open surgical repair | Individual components of the primary effectiveness endpoint - Explant of the investigational device due to any cause | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Secondary intervention (clinically significant) to address loss of patency, fixation or seal | Individual components of the primary effectiveness endpoint. This includes the following reasons for re-intervention: Loss of Patency: Complete occlusion of the aortic endovascular graft, bridging stent(s), and/or limb(s) Seal: Type Ia/Ib, IIIa/IIIb/IIIc Endoleaks Fixation: Fracture, Kink, Migration Device System Prophylaxis: Device-related Reintervention requiring hospitalization Minor Secondary Interventions will not count against the endpoint and include the following: Endovascular procedures (completed for any reason), specifically percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, atherectomy, stenting without thrombectomy or thrombolysis Interventions to address branch vessel stenosis Interventions to address Type II endoleaks Minor surgical revisions (e.g., patch angioplasty) of the access vessel | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Technical Success (at the index procedure) | Technical Success (at the index procedure) is a composite of the following:
| At time of index procedure |
| Presence of endoleak | Evaluation of the presence of all endoleak types, as confirmed by imaging | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Aneurysm size changes | Evaluation of changes in aneurysm size. Enlargement is defined as >5mm, regression is ≥ 5 mm. | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Device Migration Evaluation | Evaluation of device migration. Migration is defined as >10mm. | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Patency related observations | Stenosis and occlusion of the components of the Fenestrated TREO Stent-Graft System | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Loss of device integrity | Fracture of stent strut, barb, or fenestration ring in Fenestrated TREO, fracture of stent in any Fenestrated TREO system implant | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Target vessel instability | Target vessel instability is a composite endpoint consisting of the following side branch complications:
| Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Secondary interventions related to the device/treated lesion | Any secondary interventions that are performed that are related to the device or the treated lesion will be recorded. | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Target vessel complications | Including dissection and/or perforation | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Access-related complications | Access-related complications | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Serious Adverse Events | As per protocol definition | Evaluated at all follow up visits which occur at the following timepoints: at discharge, 30 days post-procedure, six months post-procedure, 12-months post-procedure and annually thereafter through to five years post-procedure. |
| Operative metrics - Time | Information relating to the time of the surgical procedure such as start time, stop time, duration of procedure (min) and length of endovascular time (min) | Perioperative |
| Operative metrics - Number of Vessels intended to be Perfused via Fenestrated TREO Fenestrations | Information relating to the number and name of the vessels to be perfused via the Fenestrated TREO Fenestrations | Evaluated at time of implant |
| Operative metrics - Mechanism of access | Information relating to the mechanism of access for the endovascular procedure | Evaluated at time of implant |
| Radiation Exposure - Fluoroscopy Time | Fluoroscopy time (min) | Evaluated at time of implant |
| Radiation Exposure - Total volume of Contrast | Volume of contrast used during procedure measured in mL | Evaluated at time of implant |
| Tampa General Hospital | Not yet recruiting | Tampa | Florida | 33606 | United States |
|
| Brigham and Women's Hospital | Recruiting | Boston | Massachusetts | 02115 | United States |
|
| Washington University School of Medicine | Recruiting | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
|
| Mt. Sinai | Active, not recruiting | New York | New York | 10019 | United States |
| Baylor Scott and White Research Institute | Active, not recruiting | Plano | Texas | 75093 | United States |
| University of Washington Medical Center | Recruiting | Seattle | Washington | 98195 | United States |
|
| 27109792 | Background | Deery SE, Lancaster RT, Baril DT, Indes JE, Bertges DJ, Conrad MF, Cambria RP, Patel VI. Contemporary outcomes of open complex abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2016 May;63(5):1195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.12.038. |
| 30587096 | Background | Locham S, Dakour-Aridi H, Bhela J, Nejim B, Bhavana Challa A, Malas M. Thirty-Day Outcomes of Fenestrated and Chimney Endovascular Repair and Open Repair of Juxtarenal, Pararenal, and Suprarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using National Surgical Quality Initiative Program Database (2012-2016). Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2019 Apr;53(3):189-198. doi: 10.1177/1538574418819284. Epub 2018 Dec 26. |
| 38906370 | Background | Meuli L, Kaufmann YL, Lattmann T, Attigah N, Dick F, Mujagic E, Papazoglou DD, Weiss S, Wyss TR, Zimmermann A. Editor's Choice - Peri-operative Mortality and Morbidity of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Switzerland: A Swissvasc Report. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2025 Jan;69(1):25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.06.022. Epub 2024 Jun 19. |
| 33046385 | Background | Latz CA, Boitano L, Schwartz S, Swerdlow N, Dansey K, Varkevisser RRB, Patel V, Schermerhorn ML. Editor's Choice - Mortality is High Following Elective Open Repair of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Jan;61(1):90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.09.002. Epub 2020 Oct 9. |
| 26100447 | Background | Michel M, Becquemin JP, Clement MC, Marzelle J, Quelen C, Durand-Zaleski I; WINDOW Trial Participants. Editor's choice - thirty day outcomes and costs of fenestrated and branched stent grafts versus open repair for complex aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Aug;50(2):189-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.04.012. Epub 2015 Jun 19. |
| 24647050 | Background | Inker LA, Astor BC, Fox CH, Isakova T, Lash JP, Peralta CA, Kurella Tamura M, Feldman HI. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 May;63(5):713-35. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.01.416. Epub 2014 Mar 16. |
| Background | Vaidya SR, Aeddula NR. Chronic Renal Failure. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535404/ (2023, accessed 18 September 2023) |
| 24135581 | Background | Moussa ID, Klein LW, Shah B, Mehran R, Mack MJ, Brilakis ES, Reilly JP, Zoghbi G, Holper E, Stone GW. Consideration of a new definition of clinically relevant myocardial infarction after coronary revascularization: an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 22;62(17):1563-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.720. |
| 20888533 | Background | Fillinger MF, Greenberg RK, McKinsey JF, Chaikof EL; Society for Vascular Surgery Ad Hoc Committee on TEVAR Reporting Standards. Reporting standards for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). J Vasc Surg. 2010 Oct;52(4):1022-33, 1033.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.07.008. No abstract available. |
| 12021727 | Background | Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL, White GH, Zarins CK, Bernhard VM, Matsumura JS, May J, Veith FJ, Fillinger MF, Rutherford RB, Kent KC; Ad Hoc Committee for Standardized Reporting Practices in Vascular Surgery of The Society for Vascular Surgery/American Association for Vascular Surgery. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002 May;35(5):1048-60. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.123763. No abstract available. |
| 36153066 | Background | Zettervall SL, Starnes BW. Planning and sizing of fenestrated/branched stent grafts. Semin Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;35(3):252-258. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2022.07.006. Epub 2022 Aug 6. |
| Background | Lott A, Reiter JP. Wilson Confidence Intervals for Binomial Proportions With Multiple Imputation for Missing Data. The American Statistician 2020; 74: 109-115. |
| 38608964 | Background | Raulli SJ, Gomes VC, Parodi FE, Vasan P, Sun D, Marston WA, Pascarella L, McGinigle KL, Wood JC, Farber MA. Five-year outcomes of fenestrated and branched endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms based on aneurysm extent. J Vasc Surg. 2024 Aug;80(2):302-310. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.017. Epub 2024 Apr 10. |
| 33592291 | Background | Hemingway JF, Starnes BW, Kline BR, Singh N. Initial experience with the Terumo aortic Treo device for fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2021 Sep;74(3):823-831.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.01.042. Epub 2021 Feb 14. |
| 38823478 | Background | Nguyen T, Gittinger M, Gryzbowski C, Patel S, Asirwatham M, Grundy S, Zwiebel B, Shames M, Arnaoutakis DJ. One-hundred Consecutive Physician-Modified Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair of Pararenal and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using the Terumo TREO Stent Graft. Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Sep;106:369-376. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.04.009. Epub 2024 May 31. |
| 38288587 | Background | Yeung KK, Nederhoed JH, Tran BL, Di Gregorio S, Pratesi G, Bastianon M, Melani C, Riambau V, Bloemert-Tuin T, Hazenberg CEVB, van Herwaarden JA, Balm R, Lely RJ, van der Meijs BB, Blankensteijn JD, Hoksbergen AWJ, Jongkind V. Endovascular Repair of Juxtarenal and Pararenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using a Novel Low-Profile Fenestrated Custom-Made Endograft: Technical Details and Short-Term Outcomes. J Endovasc Ther. 2025 Dec;32(6):1988-1993. doi: 10.1177/15266028241227392. Epub 2024 Jan 30. |
| 33253871 | Background | Eagleton MJ, Stoner M, Henretta J, Dryjski M, Panneton J, Tassiopoulos A, Mehta M, Pearce B, Sharafuddin MJ; TREO Investigators. Safety and effectiveness of the TREO stent graft for the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jul;74(1):114-123.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.10.083. Epub 2020 Nov 28. |
| 32615285 | Background | Oderich GS, Forbes TL, Chaer R, Davies MG, Lindsay TF, Mastracci T, Singh MJ, Timaran C, Woo EY; Writing Committee Group. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic repair of aneurysms involving the renal-mesenteric arteries. J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jan;73(1S):4S-52S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.06.011. Epub 2020 Jun 29. |
| D001018 |
| Aortic Diseases |