Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this study is to assess the acceptability and accessibility of a co-designed music therapy intervention for parents with infants with uncertain futures and nursing staff on the neonatal unit. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Participants will test an intervention comprising of:
Testing a co-designed music therapy intervention:
This study will aim to test a co-designed music therapy interventions with 12 parents of 12 infants with uncertain futures at University College London hospital and the nurses that care for them during this period.
Parents will be approached by the lead researcher, research nurse or lead consultant about participating in the study. They will be given information sheets outlining what will be expected and the potential burdens and benefits of taking part. They will be given 24hrs to consider the study before providing consent. The lead researcher will then approach to gain consent and answer any questions on the study. If consent is given, the cot side nurse will provide the family with the journal and make a referral to music therapy. A meeting with the unit music therapist will then be made and the following discussed:
After the music therapist has worked with the external contact and a musical gift created (likely to be a lullaby) it will be sent to the family either by the family contact or the music therapists as preferred by the parent. On day 7 of the study the music therapist will check in with the parent on the unit to review the materials and offer further support. Journal entries will not be shared with any member of staff or the researcher unless parents wish to. Parents can then chose to continue support or use the resources independently.
During the study period parents will be asked to complete questionnaires assessing psychological safety (Neuroception of psychological safety scale NPSS-G). These will be completed on the unit on day 1 and 16 of the study via hardcopy. Once completed, parents can leave with the reception in a sealed envelope (provided). This will then be stored in a locked research cabinet until the lead research is able to collect. Separately, nursing staff involved in the care of these babies will be encouraged to build a shared playlist to support staff relationships and regulation through music. They will be sent a digital link to the website which gives instruction and guide to engagement with families through music as well as advise on building a staff playlist. They will also be provided with 'ask me' badges to wear to signal their availability to parents that they are happy to engage in conversation about the parents use of music and the value of certain music to their family.
Evaluation of acceptability:
At the end of the study period (3 weeks) parents will be asked to complete an acceptability survey and attend a short interview. Where a baby has died parents will be contacted 6 weeks after the death to consent their continued participation in the study and completion of the survey and interview. The lead researcher will contact parents to arrange a time for a short interview either at the parents home or at a University College London Hospital research room to discuss the acceptability of the intervention further. Similarly health care professionals will also be ask to complete an acceptability survey at the end of the intervention being testing on the unit (4 months) and encouraged to give feedback on their use of the playlist and the 'ask me' badges. Prior to completing the questionnaire they will be required to complete a consent form where they can tick if they would like to be contacted to participate in an online focus group to discuss their experiences further. Those who chose to do this will be provided with an overview of the topics for discussion prior to the group.
Celebration event:
A celebration event will be held at King's Place, London to celebrate the development of the intervention and the value of the engagement from everyone who has been involved at all stages. Everyone involved at any stage of the research will be invited to this event. It will also be extended to healthcare professionals and family support charities.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent and staff participants | Experimental | Parents with infants with uncertain futures on admission to the neonatal unit and the nurses caring for them. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sound origins | Other | Parents:
Nursing staff caring for families participating in the study:
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability Questionnaire | A non-validated questionnaire developed by the researchers will assess the acceptability of the intervention based on domains from Sekon's Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. The framework includes the following domains: Affective attitude, burden, ethicality, perceived effectiveness, opportunity cost, intervention coherence, self-efficacy. These will be assessed through one questionnaire. | Parents will be assessed after completing the intervention for 3 weeks. Staff will complete the questionnaire at the end of the full study duration. This will be either after 4 months or when 12 parents have participated whichever is first. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroception of psychological safety scale- NPSS | Assessment of parent perceived psychological safety: Participants rate how well statements describe their feelings on a likert scale (strongly disagree =1 up to Strongly Agree=5). Higher scores relate to higher levels of perceived psychological safety. | Days 1 and 16 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Parent inclusion criteria:
Healthcare professional inclusion criteria:
Infant inclusion
In accordance with Together for short lives neonatal palliative care guidelines any parent who has an infant meeting the following criteria whilst on the neonatal unit will be eligible for the intervention:
Category 1: Life-threatening conditions for which curative treatment may be feasible but can fail Provision of palliative care services may be necessary when treatment fails or during an acute crisis, irrespective of the duration of threat to life. On reaching long-term remission or following successful curative treatment there is no longer a need for palliative care services. Examples: extreme prematurity, severe necrotising enterocolitis, congenital heart disease.
Category 2 Conditions where premature death is inevitable. There may be long periods of intensive treatment aimed at prolonging life and allowing participation in normal activities. Example: chromosomal abnormality, severe spina bifida, bilateral multi-cystic dysplastic kidneys, bilateral renal agenesis.
Category 3 Progressive conditions without curative treatment options Treatment is exclusively palliative and may commonly extend over many years. Example: skeletal dysplasia, severe neuromuscular disorders.
Category 4 Irreversible but non-progressive conditions causing severe disability, leading to susceptibility to health complications and likelihood of premature death. Example: severe hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy.
Exclusion Criteria:
Parent exclusion criteria
Healthcare professional exclusion criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bashir Al Hashimi | Contact | +447540670429 | vpri@kcl.ac.uk | |
| Glenn Robert | Contact | glenn.robert@kcl.ac.uk |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Glenn Robert, PhD | King's College London | Study Chair |
| Kirsty Jane | King's College London | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kings College London | London | Professor | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39467007 | Background | Jane K, Wood D, Gallagher K, Livermore P, Shoemark H, Robert G. Parents' experiences of psychotherapeutic support on the neonatal unit: A mixed methods systematic review to inform intervention development for a multicultural population. Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e13194. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13194. Epub 2024 Oct 28. | |
| Background | Standley J. Music therapy with premature infant: Research and developmental interventions. Music Therapy Perspectives. 2003;23(1):76-8. | ||
| 23589814 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Sound Origins Study, King's College London | View source |
Not provided
This is a small scale acceptability testing study as part of the lead researchers PhD.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| University College London Hospital Neonatal Unit | London | SG12 7DH | United Kingdom |
|
| Background |
| Loewy J, Stewart K, Dassler AM, Telsey A, Homel P. The effects of music therapy on vital signs, feeding, and sleep in premature infants. Pediatrics. 2013 May;131(5):902-18. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1367. Epub 2013 Apr 15. |
| 24199652 | Background | Flaks MK, Malta SM, Almeida PP, Bueno OF, Pupo MC, Andreoli SB, Mello MF, Lacerda AL, Mari JJ, Bressan RA. Attentional and executive functions are differentially affected by post-traumatic stress disorder and trauma. J Psychiatr Res. 2014 Jan;48(1):32-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Oct 22. |
| 27256250 | Background | Al Maghaireh DF, Abdullah KL, Chan CM, Piaw CY, Al Kawafha MM. Systematic review of qualitative studies exploring parental experiences in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. J Clin Nurs. 2016 Oct;25(19-20):2745-56. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13259. Epub 2016 Jun 3. |
| Background | Fraser. L. G-SD, Jarvis. D., Norman. P., Parslow. R., . 'Make Every Child Count' Estimating current and future prevalence of children and young people with life-limiting conditions in the United Kingdom. Together for Short Lives. 2020. |
| Background | NCMD. NCMD Second Annual Report. Child Death Review Data. 2021. |
| Background | Dickson G. A Perinatal Pathway for Babies with Palliative Care Needs, 2nd Edition. Together for Short Lives. 2019. |