Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Due to recruitment difficulties, the number of subjects included (n=35) was lower than expected (n=60).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is exploratory, non-comparative and open-label, conducted in France. It aims to provide insights into the effectiveness and safety of RV3895A - RY1774, potentially benefiting participants by improving scar appearance and quality of life.The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the cosmetic product RV3895A - RY1774 on re-epidermised scars of the face and body following burns and surgical stitches in adults, adolescents and children over a 6-month follow-up period.
Patients are divided into 2 groups:
The study consists of 4 visits:
Visit 1: Inclusion (Day 1), Visit 2: Intermediate visit (Day 22), Visit 3: Intermediate visit (Day 85), Visit 4: End-of-study visit (planned or anticipated) (Day 169 )
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1A | Adults with post-burn scar(s) |
| |
| Group 1C | Adults with post-suture scar(s) requiring stitches to be inserted and removed if applicable (in the case of non-absorbable stitches). |
| |
| Group 2A | Children/adolescents with post-burn scar(s). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product gel RV3895A | Other | The product is applied twice a day to the scar(s) under study, avoiding all contact with natural orifices (and avoiding ingestion by children in the case of application to the hands in particular). The product is applied using a specific massage technique developed for the product and which is explained by the investigator at visit 1. The product is applied in sufficient quantity to cover the application area. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Physical aspect of scar(s) compared to normal skin by the investigator | The investigator assessed the physical appearance of the studied scar(s) in comparison to normal skin using the "POSAS Observer Scale" (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale) | Day 1, Day 22, Day 85, and Day 169 |
| Physical and functional aspect of scar(s) by the subject | Subjects who were of age to complete the assessment evaluated the physical appearance in comparison to normal skin and the functional appearance of the studied scar(s) using the "POSAS Patient Scale" | Day 1, Day 22, Day 85, and Day 169, and monthly at home between Visit 2 and Visit4 |
| Soothing effect | The subject/parent(s) or legal guardian(s) evaluated the soothing effect using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) to assess discomfort over the past 3 days (except for the evaluation at Day 1 after application) from 0 (no discomfort) to 10 (severe discomfort) | at Day 1 (before and after product application), Day 22, Day 85, and Day 169, and monthly at home between Visit 2 and Visit 4. |
| Inflammatory aspect of scar | The investigator evaluated the inflammatory aspect of the scar using the vitropression test | at Day 1, Day 22, Day 85, and Day 169 |
| Evolution of scar aspect compared to Day 1 | The investigator assessed the evolution of the scar's appearance compared to D1 based on all parameters evaluated in the study using a dynamic Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scale ranging from -1 (worsening), 0 (no change), 1 (slight improvement), 2 (clear improvement), 3 (very clear improvement) | at Day 22, Day 85, and Day 169 |
| Overall satisfaction with Test product (Investigator's assessment) |
Not provided
Not provided
INCLUSION CRITERIA :
Male or female
For group 1: subjects aged between 18 to 65 included
For group 2: subjects aged between 2 to 17 years included
Subject with superficial scar(s):
NON-INCLUSION CRITERIA:
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects were recruited from their usual consultations and/or from the centre's registry. If necessary, advertisements were used.
Subjects corresponding to the eligibility criteria could receive a telephone call, letter or email offering them to take part in this clinical study.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinique de Rééducation et de Réadaptation Fonctionnelle du Docteur Jean Ster | Lamalou-les-Bains | 34240 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
The investigator assessed overall satisfaction with the product's impact on scar appearance based on usual practice and study parameters using an NRS from 0 (not at all satisfied) to 10 (very satisfied) |
| at Day 22, Day 85, and Day 169 |
| Overall satisfaction with Test product (Subject/Parent/Guardian assessment) | The subject/parent(s) or legal guardian(s) assessed overall satisfaction with the product's impact on scar appearance using an NRS from 0 (not at all satisfied) to 10 (very satisfied) | at Day 22, Day 85, and Day 169 |
| Erythema quantification | Erythema was quantified using chromametry through spectrocolorimetric parameters | at Day 1, Day 22, Day 85, and Day 169 |
| Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) | Quality of life was assessed by subjects of appropriate age using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire | at Day 1, Day 22, Day 85, and Day 169 and monthly at home between Visit 2 and Visit 4 |
| Specific impact of burns on quality of life | For subgroup 1a (Burns) only : evaluated by subjects using the "body image" and "heat sensitivity" subdomains of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) | at Day 1, Day 22, Day 85, and Day 169 |
| Visual aspect of the scar through illustrative photographs | at Day 1, Day 22, Day 85, and Day 169. |
| The quantity of product used calculated by weighing the tubes | Between Day 1 and Day 169 |
| Subjective cosmetic acceptability of the product | The subjective cosmetic acceptability of the product was evaluated by the subject/parent(s) or legal guardian(s) using a questionnaire | at Day 22, Day 85, and Day 169 |
| Recording of adverse events | At each visit, the occurrence of adverse events since the last visit was determined based on spontaneous reports from the subject/parent(s) or legal guardian(s), non-subjective questioning, and clinical evaluations performed by the investigator. All adverse events were recorded in the Case Report Form (CRF) | at Day 1 (first application of the product on site), Day 22, Day 85, and Day 169 |
| Overall tolerance assessed by the investigator | Overall tolerance was assessed by the investigator considering all individual adverse events and their characteristics, as well as past experience with similar products, using a 5-point scale (Excellent, Very Good, Good, Moderate, Poor) | at Day 22, Day 85, and Day 169 |
| Compliance | The subject was to record in their subject diary the applications of the study product, as well as any omissions and changes in frequency | Duration of the study, from Day 1 to Day 169 |