Minimal Vitrectomy Surgery (MVS) Versus Conventional Vitrectomy for the Treatment of Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Minimal Vitrectomy Surgery (MVS) Versus Conventional Vitrectomy for the Treatment of Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
This multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluates Minimal Vitrectomy Surgery (MVS) versus conventional vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM). The primary endpoints include visual acuity improvement and cataract progression after 12 months. MVS aims to minimize vitreous removal while ensuring complete membrane removal through adaptive limited vitrectomy.
Idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) is characterized by fibrocellular proliferation on the retinal surface, leading to macular edema, metamorphopsia, and visual impairment. Traditional treatment involves pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) induction and core vitrectomy, which may increase the risk of postoperative cataract.
Minimal Vitrectomy Surgery (MVS) is a modified surgical approach designed to minimize vitreous removal and preserve the hyaloid. The epiretinal membrane is directly peeled through the intact vitreous. If pre-existing vitreous floaters or membrane fragments remain after peeling and cannot be removed safely with micro-forceps, limited localized vitrectomy is selectively performed to eliminate these floaters and avoid postoperative visual disturbances.
This trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MVS compared to conventional vitrectomy, focusing on visual improvement, macular thickness, cataract progression, ERM recurrence, and intraoperative complications.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
yuweihongpumch@163.com+8613671214306
yezhong019@163.com+8619121036553