Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Singapore General Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This clinical study is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, outpatient study comparing the efficacy of combination of dnaJP1 peptide and hydroxychloroquine versus combination of placebo and hydroxychloroquine in patients with moderately to severely active RA who are naive to cs-, b-, tsp.-DMARDs.
A sample size of 124 patients will be enrolled in the study. Each patient will receive either combination of dnaJP1 peptide and hydroxychloroquine or combination of placebo and hydroxychloroquine in 1:1 allocation ratio.
Despite the availability of a plethora of new drugs to treat Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), a holistic and accurate understanding of how therapy with biologics works is still missing. The knowledge gap is particularly poignant if one considers that the second-generation drugs developed for immune therapy is still entirely suppressive. Thus, the dramatic advances in molecular immunology has yet to be translated into the needed evolution from immune suppression to true immune tolerization, an important step on the evolutionary pathway from therapy to cure.
This study is designed to be a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial which has two fundamental objectives:
To identify and dissect mechanisms of induction of immune tolerance in RA patients in response to immune therapy with dnaJP1, a microbiome-derived peptide. Tangibly in the context of clinical development, the investigators aim to capitalize on this knowledge to identify and validate biomarkers predictor of efficacy and clinical response;
The investigators will also determine the effect size needed to demonstrate whether the combination of dnaJP1 peptide and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is superior to the combination of placebo and hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active RA naïve to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (i.e. DMARDs and biologics-naïve).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| dnaJP1 | Experimental | dnaJP1 peptide 25mg with Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) 200mg once daily are administered orally, preferably in the morning on an empty stomach. |
|
| Control | Placebo Comparator | Placebo 25mg with Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) 200mg once daily are administered orally, preferably in the morning on an empty stomach. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dnaJP1 | Drug | The study drug is dnaJP1 peptide. It is a manmade short protein that can be taken easily as a pill. dnaJP1 works to restore the body's immune tolerance by improving its ability to self-adjust - helps to restore the immune system and improve controls on inflammation that has been lost. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To estimate effect size needed to ascertain the power i.e. the number of patients to be tested in the future study to prove superiority of the combination dnaJP1 and HCQ versus placebo and HCQ - To determine this ACR20 will be employed | An American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% response (ACR20) response was defined as at least 20% improvement in both the tender joint count and the swollen joint count and at least 20% improvement in 3 of the 5 other core set measures listed below. The core set required the inclusion of 7 clinical end points for all RA trials: swollen joint count, tender joint count, physician's assessment of disease activity, patient's assessment of disease activity, patient's assessment of pain, and patient's assessment of physical function, and levels of an acute-phase reactant (either the C-reactive protein [CRP] level or the erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]). | At Study End being 7 Months |
| A primary endpoint of the study will be to determine safety and tolerability of the experimental treatment in terms of AEs, SAEs, TEAEs | Reporting of Adverse Events | At Study End being 7 Months |
| A mechanistic predictor of clinical efficacy at enrolment before first dosing related to immune changes in the cell activation | A combination of high dimensionality technologies will be employed, which will include single cell proteomics, a single cell RNA SEQ flow cytometry and mechanistic studies in vitro | At Study End being 7 Months |
| A mechanistic biomarker of treatment response based on 20% change from baseline in increase in Tregs and decrease in inflammatory T cells | Immunological analysis performed on patients samples | At Study End being 7 Months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To estimate the effect size needed to ascertain the power i.e. the number of patients to be tested in the future study to prove superiority of the combination dnaJP1 and HCQ versus placebo and HCQ - ACR50 | The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50% response (ACR50) response is the same instruments with improvement levels defined as 50% versus 20% for ACR20 | At Study End being 7 Months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Using the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for RA, classification as definite RA is based upon the presence of synovitis in at least one joint, the absence of an alternative diagnosis that better explains the synovitis, and the achievement of a total score of at least 6 (of a possible 10) from the individual scores in four domains. The highest score achieved in a given domain is used for this calculation. These domains and their values are:
Number and site of involved joints:
Serological abnormality (rheumatoid factor or anti-citrullinated peptide/protein antibody)
Elevated acute phase response (erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] or C-reactive protein [CRP]) above the ULN = 1 point
Symptom duration at least six weeks = 1 point
Exclusion Criteria:
On prednisolone >10 mg daily
History of receiving:
conventional synthetic (cs-) disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as sulfasalazine, methotrexate, and leflunomide administered 6 months prior to screening
•. biological (b-) DMARDs such as rituximab, infliximab, tocilizumab, adalimumab, etc.
tissue-specific (tsp.-) DMARDs such as JAK inhibitors
History of lymphoma
Active malignancy requiring treatment the last 5 years except for non-melanoma skin cancers and carcinoma of the cervix in situ
Pregnancy
Breast-feeding
Active Infection, e.g., Hepatitis B, tuberculosis
A known hypersensitivity to dnaJP1 or to any of the excipients
Significant cardiac history, e.g., have experienced any of the following within 12 weeks of study entry: myocardial infarction, unstable ischemic heart disease, stroke, or New York Heart Association Stage IV heart failure
A history or presence of dermatological, cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, gastrointestinal, endocrine, haematological, neurological, or neuropsychiatric disorders or any other serious and/or unstable illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, could constitute a risk when taking HCQ and/or the investigational product or could interfere with the interpretation of data
An eGFR based on the most recent available serum creatinine using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) method of <40 ml/min/1.73 m2
A history of chronic liver disease with the most recent available aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >1.5 times the ULN or the most recent available total bilirubin 1.5 times the ULN
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salvatore Albani, MD PhD | Contact | +65 6576 7179 | salvo@duke-nus.edu.sg | |
| Grace Compton-Tan | Contact | +65 6576 7185 |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Salvatore Albani, MD PhD | Singapore Health Services | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Singapore General Hospital | Recruiting | Singapore | 169856 | Singapore |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001172 | Arthritis, Rheumatoid |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Placebo | Drug | This is the control. |
|
| To estimate the effect size needed to ascertain the power i.e. the number of patients to be tested in the future study to prove superiority of the combination dnaJP1 and HCQ versus placebo and HCQ - ACR70 | The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70% response (ACR70) response is the same instruments with improvement levels defined as 70% versus 20% for ACR20 | At Study End being 7 Months |
| To estimate the effect size needed to ascertain the power i.e. the number of patients to be tested in the future study to prove superiority of the combination dnaJP1 and HCQ versus placebo and HCQ - DAS28-ESR | Disease Activity Score-28 for Rheumatoid Arthritis with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28- ESR) describes severity of rheumatoid arthritis using clinical and laboratory data, specifically ESR. The number "28" describes the number of different joints examined in the assessment. The DAS-ESR values range from 2.0 to 10.0 while higher values indicate higher disease activity. A DAS28-ESR score of ≤ 2.6 indicates remission or ≤ 3.2 indicates low disease activity. | At Study End being 7 Months |
| To estimate the effect size needed to ascertain the power i.e. the number of patients to be tested in the future study to prove superiority of the combination dnaJP1 and HCQ versus placebo and HCQ - DAS28-hsCRP | Disease Activity Score-28 for Rheumatoid Arthritis with CRP (DAS28-CRP) is a modification of the DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP uses the C-Reactive Protein (CRP) value instead of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The DAS28-CRP values range from 2.0 to 10.0 while higher values indicate higher disease activity. | At Study End being 7 Months |
| To estimate the effect size needed to ascertain the power i.e. the number of patients to be tested in the future study to prove superiority of the combination dnaJP1 and HCQ versus placebo and HCQ - Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score | The CDAI is a composite index (without acute-phase reactant) for assessing disease activity. CDAI score is based on the simple summation of the count of swollen/tender joint count of 28 joints along with patient and physician global assessment on VAS (0-10 cm) Scale for estimating disease activity. The CDAI score ranges from 0 to 76. A CDAI score of ≤ 2.8 indicates remission of disease. | At Study End being 7 Months |
| To estimate the effect size needed to ascertain the power i.e. the number of patients to be tested in the future study to prove superiority of the combination dnaJP1 and HCQ versus placebo and HCQ - Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) | The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: tender and swollen joint count (based on a 28-joint assessment), patient and physician global assessment of disease activity [visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-10 cm] and level of C-reactive protein (mg/dl, normal <1 mg/dl). A SDAI score of ≤ 3.3 indicates remission of disease. | At Study End being 7 Months |
| D003240 |
| Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |