Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| CIV-22-09-040866 | Other Identifier | EUDAMED |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
For skin rejuvenation the targeted population does not present a specific pathology. Aesthetic procedures are requested by the patient to improve appearance, look younger and feel better.
Non-crosslinked Hyaluronic acid (HA) is widely used by intradermal multiple injection as it is a glycosaminoglycan, which binds and retains water thus improving the wrinkles while the tone and elasticity of the skin.
Previous studies showed that an important administration of Si had benefic effects on bone development, skin ageing and fragile hair and nails.
The major issue of the Si intake is the rapid absorption and excretion, and consequently low effects on the skin. Moreover, with ageing, gastric pH become more acidic and decreases the conversion capacity of the Si.
All these data together led Laboratoires Fillmed to develop an HA product boosted by Si to inject into ther dermis in order to fill fine lines wrinkes and improve skin quality.
This study aims to demonstrate the efficacy of this new Hyaluronic Acid based filler versus a reference device, with an intradermal multi-injection technique, on reducing the superficial wrinkles measured by comparative evaluation between baseline and D30+10 of the evolution of wrinkles of the face / neck and décolleté by clinical scoring.
To this end, subjects in whom a correction of wrinkles of the face and/or décolleté and/or neck is sought, will be included. Subjects will receive 2 sessions of treatment on each side of the concerned area and the aesthetic correction will be appreciated at 10 ± 2 days (D30+10) following the last treatment session and the maintenance of the correction will be evaluated on D60, D120 and D180.
Main objective:
The main objective of this randomized study is to demonstrate objectively the effectiveness of the studied device, on the reduction of the universal wrinkles score, performed in presence of the subjects, between baseline and D30+10 (10 days after the last injection) on the cheeks, neck or décolleté and its non-inferiority by intraindividual comparison versus a reference device for the cheek and the neck.
Secondary objectives:
For all groups and for the concerned zones:
- to assess the efficacy of the devices between baseline and D180 (including D0, D30+10, D60, D120 and D180) and comparatively evaluate the efficacy for the cheeks and neck of the tested device compared to the reference device on:
the Universal Wrinkles Score performed on the cheek's wrinkles, neck wrinkles or décolleté's wrinkles by the investigators, in presence of the subjects
Zone-specific (cheek, neck or décolleté) clinical scores performed from photographical visual scales, Clinical score of radiance (for the face)
the Universal Wrinkles Score performed at the end of the study in a blind manner by an expert on the cheek's wrinkles, neck wrinkles or décolleté's wrinkles from the standardized photographs
- to assess the efficacy of the devices from D30 to D180 on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scores performed by:
the investigator (IGAIS) for 5 items
the subjects (SGAIS) for 5 items
Three Research Centerswere added to the study to have objective and instrumental data on the efficacy of the products on skin's:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| MHA30 injected on the Left (Split face study) for Face and Neck (Décolleté is not comparative) | Experimental | In assessing the aesthetic performance and safety of devices, the inter-individual variability is very large. As a result, a methodology often used is split-face evaluation , the subject being its own control. Schematically, the area of application (right or left hemiface) is drawn randomly and evaluations are done separately. It is a single blind study: during the injections, the eyes of the subject will be obscured by 2 ocular pads. As the procedure of injection of Profhilo for the face does not include the forehead and crow's feet, comparison will be performed with this device only on the lower part of the face (only M-HA®30 Architect will be injected on the crow's feet and forehead for a non-comparative before-after evolution study). As wrinkles of the décolleté are present mainly in the center of the décolleté, it was decided not to make a comparative on this area (only M-HA®30 Architect will be injected). |
|
| MHA-30 injected on the Right (Split face study) for Face and Neck (Décolleté is not comparative) | Experimental | In assessing the aesthetic performance and safety of devices, the inter-individual variability is very large. As a result, a methodology often used is split-face evaluation , the subject being its own control. Schematically, the area of application (right or left hemiface) is drawn randomly and evaluations are done separately. It is a single blind study: during the injections, the eyes of the subject will be obscured by 2 ocular pads. As the procedure of injection of Profhilo for the face does not include the forehead and crow's feet, comparison will be performed with this device only on the lower part of the face (only M-HA®30 Architect will be injected on the crow's feet and forehead for a non-comparative before-after evolution study). As wrinkles of the décolleté are present mainly in the center of the décolleté, it was decided not to make a comparative on this area (only M-HA®30 Architect will be injected). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intradermal injection | Device | The product is the first solution with free hyaluronic acid boosted with silicium the administration mode is same as any other intradermal multi-injection procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Universal wrinkles score | Universal Wrinkles Score (UWS) inspired from the Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkles Scale. It is a 7 grades score. Score definition 0 No wrinkle
| Between Day 0 and Day 40 |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Male or female subjects except for injections on the décolleté that will only concern women
From 19 to 84 years old
Who has signed a written informed consent;
With a Fitzpatrick phototype of I, II, III or IV
Having on both sides, one of the 3 following conditions:
Registered with Social Security (for France)
Accepting not to expose him/herself to the sun or ultraviolet (UV) during the entire duration of the study.
For female of childbearing potential accepting to take a pregnancy test (a pregnancy test will be performed before each injection) and a highly effective contraception* method during whole study.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fillmed Laboratoires | Paris | 75008 | France |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007271 | Injections, Intradermal |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007279 | Injections, Subcutaneous |
| D007267 | Injections |
| D004333 | Drug Administration Routes |
| D004358 | Drug Therapy |
Not provided
Not provided
This is a split face study (the investigational product could be injected on the left or on the right); the comparator will be injected on the opposite side
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D013812 |
| Therapeutics |