Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is an observational registry-based study of long-term outcome after vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse designed to emulate a pragmatic open-label two-arm trial for which patients, in whom perineorrhaphy is not strictly indicated but clinically tenable, perioperatively are randomized to concomitant perineorrhaphy or not.
This is an emulated pragmatic open-label two-arm trial in patients undergoing native tissue repair surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, in which patients are randomized perioperatively to either concomitant perineorrhaphy or not. The target population is the large group of patients for whom, at the discretion of the surgeon, this intervention is currently an option while not being strictly indicated. The investigators assumed that women were randomly assigned perioperatively to either strategy within levels of baseline co-variables: age, BMI, parity, lung disease, ASA-classification, constipation, hypermobility, prolapse in which vaginal compartment and if surgery is performed on it, year of primary surgery and region. Data was obtained from The Swedish National Quality Register of Gynaecological Surgery (GynOp), the Swedish National Patient Register, the Swedish Medical Birth Register, and the Swedish Cause of Death Register. In order to emulate a target trial, multiple imputation of missing data is followed by controlling for confounding through inverse probability weighting (IPW) in order to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) in the primary analysis. In the secondary analysis, the primary analysis will be repeated but with overlap weights. Additional analyses: The sample will be re-weighted using IPW to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT). Restricted mean survival time (RMST) will be calculated at five years of follow-up for the primary outcome. Bias analysis: Mortality during follow up for the primary outcome will be used as a negative control.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perineorrhaphy | Primary pelvic organ prolapse surgery (no concomitant hysterectomy) with native tissue repair including perineorrhaphy |
| |
| No perineorrhaphy | Primary pelvic organ prolapse surgery (no concomitant hysterectomy) with native tissue repair excluding perineorrhaphy |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perineorrhaphy | Procedure | Concomitant perineorrhaphy |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Reoperation | Reported as absolute risk difference, with cumulative risks during five years of follow-up estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Data obtained from the The Swedish National Quality Register of Gynaecological Surgery (GynOp) and the Swedish National Patient Register. | 5 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Symptoms of a vaginal bulge (patient reported outcome) | Absolute risk difference for the outcome at 1 year follow-up with the non-inferiority margin set to 10% of the absolute risk in the comparison group. Data obtained from the The Swedish National Quality Register of Gynaecological Surgery (GynOp). | At 1 year |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with their primary vaginal pelvic organ prolapse surgery registered in the Swedish National Quality Register of Gynaecological Surgery (GynOp).
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lund University | Malmö | Sweden |
Data are available from the registry source.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D056887 | Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
| D052858 | Cystocele |
| D020047 | Rectocele |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011391 | Prolapse |
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D001745 | Urinary Bladder Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| No perineorrhaphy |
| Procedure |
No concomitant perineorrhaphy |
|
| Unsatisfied (patient reported outcome) |
Absolute risk difference for the outcome at 1 year follow-up with the non-inferiority margin set to 10% of the absolute risk in the comparison group. Data obtained from the The Swedish National Quality Register of Gynaecological Surgery (GynOp). |
| At 1 year |
| D014570 | Urologic Diseases |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D012002 | Rectal Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D006547 | Hernia |