Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the diagnostic accuracy study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of probing depth before (PPD-1) and following (PPD-2) the removal of prothesis in identifying the presence of peri-implantitis and assess the factors influencing peri-implant probing.
This study aims to design a diagnostic accuracy study to compare the peri-implant probing depth and bleeding on probing before and after crown removal. It will explore the impact of prosthetic design on the accuracy of peri-implant probing and its diagnostic accuracy, and provide clinical recommendations on whether the prosthesis should be removed prior to peri-implant probing.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| patients with dental implant restorations | Consecutive patients were selected who were treated at the Department of Oral Implantology, Stomatology Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| peri-implant probing before and after crown removal | Diagnostic Test | Before removal of the prosthetic reconstruction:
After removal of the prosthetic reconstruction, PPD-2 and BOP-2 were recorded following the same protocol. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| probing depth | The PPDs at 6 site were measured as the distance from the mucosal margin to the base of the peri-implant pocket. | On the day of enrollment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| bleeding on probing | Bleeding sites after gentle probing within 15s were recorded as BOP scores. A positive score (1 point) was recorded if bleeding was observed during either of probing assessment by two researchers. | On the day of enrollment |
| Emergency angel |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
For this study, the calculation was estimated considering the peri-implantitis prevalence at implant level, thealternative the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.90 , a 5% alpha error and 90% power. Thus, the minimum required sample size was 83 subjects.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine | Recruiting | Hangzhou | Zhejiang | 310000 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41708887 | Derived | Xu M, Bao S, Qian Y, Qiu C, Zhang J, Si M. Diagnostic Accuracy of Peri-Implant Probing With or Without Prostheses in Detecting Peri-Implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2026 May;37(5):612-622. doi: 10.1111/clr.70104. Epub 2026 Feb 18. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D057873 | Peri-Implantitis |
| D004194 | Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
The emergence angle was calculated as the angle between the implant long axis and a line tangent to the restoration. The measurements were repeated twice, and the mean was calculated for each mesial and distal interproximal surface. |
| The X-ray examination will be completed on the day of enrollment |
| Emergency profile | Emergence profile was categorized as either concave, straight or convex. | The X-ray examination will be completed on the day of enrollment |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |