Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is an open-label, single-arm, phase 4 study to assess the safety and efficacy of mirikizumab in approximately 60 participants with stricturing CD.
This is an open-label, single-arm, phase 4 study to assess the safety and efficacy of mirikizumab in approximately 60 participants with stricturing CD. This study will enroll adults (≥18 years of age) with a diagnosis of ileal or ileocolonic CD based upon radiologic, clinical, endoscopic, and histologic evidence with tolerable obstructive stricture symptoms. Participants will be recruited from approximately 15 sites in 2 countries (United States and Canada).
This study consists of 3 study periods (screening period, open-label treatment period, and safety follow-up). After signing informed consent, potential study participants will be screened over a 5-week screening period, including MRE and ileocolonoscopy to confirm the presence of inflammatory strictures. Eligible participants will receive 900 mg mirikizumab IV Q4W to Week 12 and then 300 mg mirikizumab SC Q4W to Week 24.
During screening and Week 24 visits, participants will undergo MRE for blinded MRE disease activity assessment with the MaRIA score and assessment of stricture features. At the same time points, ileocolonoscopy with biopsy collection (2 from the ileum, 2 from the rectum, and 2 from each colonic segment [ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid]; 12 biopsies total) will be performed for blinded endoscopic and histopathologic disease activity assessments with the SES-CD and RHI, respectively.
Throughout the study, participants will undergo routine safety assessments at clinic visits, which will include physical examination, vital signs, clinical laboratory assessment, and recording of SAEs. At specified time points throughout the study, participants will complete a 7 day paper study diary consisting of patient reported items of the CDAI, UNRS, PGI-C, PGI-S, and the S-PRO. Blood samples will be collected at Weeks 12 and 24 for safety laboratory and CRP assessments. Stool samples will be collected at baseline and Week 24 for assessing FCP levels. The SIBDQ will be completed in-clinic at screening and Week 24.
Participants will undergo a Safety Follow-up Visit 4 weeks after the last dose of study treatment for safety assessments and recording of SAEs, severe liver injury (ALT or AST ≥ 3 × ULN), serious infections, and CD-related complications. The safety follow-up visit can be performed by telephone, unless the participant has any ongoing AEs that require follow-up assessment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mirikizumab | Other | Open-label mirikizumab 900mg IV Weeks 0,4, and 8 then mirikizumab 300mg SC Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirikizumab | Drug | Mirikizumab is an IL-23 antagonist. |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in inducing a radiologic response in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Achievement of radiologic response (defined by a ≥ 50% improvement in stricture length and no worsening of prestenotic small bowel diameter OR a ≥ 50% improvement in prestenotic small bowel diameter and no worsening of stricture length) | At week 24 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in S PRO score | At week 4 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in health-related quality of life in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Nonpregnant, nonlactating adults, ≥ 18 years of age.
Diagnosis of ileal or ileocolonic CD based on standard clinical, endoscopic, and histologic evidence; established at least 3 months prior to screening.
Presence of at least 1 inflammatory stricture in the terminal ileum* within reach of an endoscope (passable or nonpassable). Strictures should be noncritical, naïve or anastomotic stricture(s), caused by CD and confirmed centrally by MRE according to the following criteria:
Abdominal pain after eating and/or limitations in the amount/types of food eaten.
Presence of tolerable obstructive symptoms and not expected to require hospitalization, endoscopic balloon dilation, surgical resection, or additional therapy during the study period. Participants should have sufficient food intake, even with diet modification, defined as a stable weight over 4 weeks prior to initiation of study intervention.
Participants taking oral corticosteroids (eg, ≤ 20 mg/day prednisone or ≤ 9 mg/day budesonide) for ≥ 4 weeks prior to screening. Participants must be willing to undergo corticosteroid taper 8 weeks after initiation of study intervention as per standard of care.
Participants can be on stable background therapy for CD and must agree to maintain the background therapy during the study. Acceptable stable background therapies include:
Contraceptive use by study participants should be in accordance with the mirikizumab product monograph and local guidelines.
Signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
History or current diagnosis of UC, indeterminate colitis, ischemic colitis, nonsteroidal anti inflammatory drug-induced colitis, idiopathic colitis (ie, colitis not consistent with CD), radiation colitis, microscopic colitis, colonic mucosal dysplasia, or untreated bile acid malabsorption.
CD-related complications:
Any major surgery, in the investigator's opinion, performed within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned during the study (ie, any surgical procedure requiring general anesthesia).
Malignancies or history of malignancy within 5 years of the initial screening visit, except for adequately treated or completely excised nonmetastatic basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or cervical carcinoma in situ.
Diagnosis of decompensated liver disease, including but not limited to autoimmune liver disease, viral hepatitis, Wilson disease, or suspected drug-induced liver injury.
Liver chemistry parameters that exceed the following thresholds:
Concomitant use of the following medications during the screening period or throughout the study:
Not up-to-date with current age-appropriate vaccinations in accordance with current immunization guidelines and the investigator's usual standard of care at screening.
Concurrent or previous participation in another clinical trial and received investigational therapy within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to screening.
Any previous treatment with an antifibrotic therapy, including investigational antifibrotic therapies.
Systemic or opportunistic infections including:
Known or suspected allergy, anaphylaxis, hypersensitivity or intolerance to mirikizumab or its' excipients.
Contraindication to MRE examination or suspected allergy to MRE contrast agent or antispasmodic.
Prior enrolment in the current study and had received study treatment.
Any acute or chronic medical condition, psychiatric disorder, or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or study intervention administration, or may interfere with the interpretation of study results, as determined by the investigator.
Unwillingness to withhold protocol-prohibited medications during the trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Earle | Contact | jennifer.earle@alimentiv.com | ||
| Anna Cheng | Contact | 416-705-3688 | anna.cheng@alimentiv.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digestive & Liver Center of Florida | Recruiting | Orlando | Florida | 32825 | United States |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003424 | Crohn Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015212 | Inflammatory Bowel Diseases |
| D005759 | Gastroenteritis |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000708407 | mirikizumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Change from baseline in S PRO score |
| At week 4 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in radiologic disease activity in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in S PRO score | At week 4 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in endoscopic disease activity in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in S PRO score | At week 4 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in histologic disease activity in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in S PRO score | At week 4 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in S PRO score | At week 8 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change in baseline in S PRO score | At week 12 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in S PRO score | At week 16 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in S PRO score | At week 20 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in S PRO score | At week 24 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in CDAI score | At week 12 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in CDAI score | At week 24 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in PRO2 Score | At week 12 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in PRO2 score | At week 24 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in HBI score | At week 12 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in HBI score | At week 24 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Achievement of endoscopic response (defined by ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in SES-CD score) AND radiographic improvement (defined by a ≥ 25% improvement from baseline in stricture MaRIA score) | At week 24 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Achievement of endoscopic response (defined by ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in SES-CD score) | At week 24 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in SIBDQ score | At week 24 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in UNRS score | At week 12 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in UNRS score | At week 24 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in RHI score | At week 24 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Achievement of histological response (defined by a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in RHI score) | At week 24 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Achievement of CRP response (defined by ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in CRP levels) | At week 12 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Achievement of CRP response (defined by ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in CRP levels) | At week 24 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in CRP level | At week 12 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in CRP level | At week 24 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Achievement of FCP response (defined by ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in FCP level) | At week 24 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in FCP level | At week 24 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in PGI-S score | At week 4 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in PGI-S score | At week 8 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in PGI-S score | At week 12 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in PGI-S score | At week 16 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in PGI-S score | At week 20 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | Change from baseline in PGI-S score | At week 24 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | PGI-S score | At week 4 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | PGI-S score | At week 8 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | PGI-S score | At week 12 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | PGI-S score | At week 16 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | PGI-S score | At week 20 |
| To evaluate the efficacy of mirikizumab in improving symptoms in participants with inflammatory stricturing CD | PGI-S score | At week 24 |
| To evaluate the safety of mirikizumab in participants with stricturing CD | Occurrence of SAEs, severe liver injury (ALT or AST ≥ 3 × ULN), and serious infections | Through end of safety follow-up |
| To evaluate the safety of mirikizumab in participants with stricturing CD | CD-related complications | Through end of safety follow-up defined as a composite of (1) CD-related surgery, (2) CD-related hospitalization, (3) CD-medication-related complication, and (4) rescue therapy for a documented CD-related flare |
| Velocity Clinical- Salt Lake City | Active, not recruiting | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84088 | United States |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |