Clinical Evaluation of Biological Drilling Osteotomy Protocol Versus Conventional Drilling Osteotomy Protocol

Clinical Evaluation of Biological Drilling Osteotomy Protocol Versus Conventional Drilling Osteotomy Protocol in the Mandibular Posterior Area a Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aims to evaluate the effect of biological drilling osteotomy protocol compared to conventional osteotomy protocol in delayed implant placement in the posterior mandible regarding implant stability Type of study design: Randomized Clinical Trial In patient indicated for delayed implant placement in the lower posterior mandible will the use of biological drilling protocol osteotomy compared to conventional drilling protocol osteotomy differ regarding implant stability at three months?

Inclusion Criteria:

• Systemically healthy male and female patients, aged 21 to 60 years old,
• Indicated for delayed implant placement in the posterior mandibular arch.
• Good oral health.
• Willingness to sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Heavy smoker (> 10 cigarettes/day)
• Pregnant females
• Contraindication for Implant surgery.
• Patients with poor oral hygiene.
• A history of radiotherapy in the head or neck region.
• Patients with systemic disease like uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, coagulation disorders, alcohol or drug abuse not suitable for implantation.