Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Sinclair Pharmaceuticals Limited | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study will be a prospective, randomized, multi-center, split-face, controlled, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ELLANSÉ®-S for the treatment of NLFs. Subjects will be randomized to receive treatment (ELLANSÉ®-S) in one NLF and control (Radiesse®) in the contralateral NLF. A total of 126 subjects will be treated. The control and test articles will be supplied in sterile ready-to-use, pre-filled syringes. Initial treatment and any 4-week touch-up will be done consistent with initial randomization. Any retreatment(s) in either NLF will be with ELLANSÉ®-S.
Subjects who meet Inclusion/Exclusion criteria will receive an initial treatment, an optional touch up at the 4-week visit, and may be eligible to receive retreatment at either 12 or 18 months after treatment (determined by when the fold has returned to baseline score, or the fold has lost at least 1 point on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) from optimal improvement). Retreatment to one side is allowed if only one side qualifies, but the other side may not be retreated at a later visit. If retreatment occurs, the subject may also be eligible to receive an optional touch up at the 4-week follow up visit. If a touch up occurs after the initial or retreatment injection, the subject will return for an additional safety visit 2 weeks after each injection. A week 4 safety visit will occur after retreatment touch-up. Primary effectiveness will be assessed at 6 months. All subjects will be followed for a minimum of 24 months after the initial treatment phase. After each injection, subjects will be contacted by telephone call/email after 72 hours and will return for a safety visit 2 weeks after treatment. At the week 4 visit, subjects will be assessed for a touch up. If a touch up is indicated as determined by the investigator, the investigator will use the same material as that used for initial treatment for the respective side. In addition, subjects will be seen at 6 weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months (from the end of the initial treatment phase). Subjects receiving a retreatment (at 12 or 18 months after treatment) will return for additional safety visits at 2 weeks and 3 and 6 months after this retreatment (the 6 month coincides with regularly scheduled visit). Subjects will have the option of a retreatment touch up injection at 4 weeks after retreatment, and if they do will have another call at 72hrs and a week 2 safety visit.
The validated Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale will be used for assessment of the primary effectiveness endpoint (1). Assessment of the secondary effectiveness endpoints will include use of WSRS, the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), VAS pain assessment, the validated FACE-Q Appraisal of Nasolabial Folds Questionnaire, the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Treatment Outcome Scale and the FACE-Q Age Appraisal VAS.
The study will last approximately 30 months. All subjects will be recruited within approximately 6 months after the recruitment of the first subject and followed for a minimum of 24 months after the initial treatment visit. Subjects receiving a retreatment (at 12 or 18 months) will receive a telephone call/email 72 hours after retreatment and they will return for an additional safety visit 2 weeks after retreatment. Subjects may receive a retreatment touch up at 4 weeks after retreatment, and if touched up, will have safety visits at 2 and 4 weeks. All retreated subjects will also be asked to attend month 3 and month 6 safety visits. The 6-month safety visit will correspond with the next study visit (e.g., 18 month or 24-month visit depending on when they are reinjected)
126 male and female subjects will be enrolled. This enrollment number accounts for a 20% attrition rate, to ensure an adequate safety population for long-term follow-up, and a Per Protocol Set (PPS) of at least 101 NLFs per treatment arm. At least 20% of treated subjects will have Fitzpatrick Skin Types IV, V, and VI. Of these, at least, 10% will be Type IV, 5% Type V and 5% Type VI. The investigative sites will be encouraged to enroll both male and female subjects. In addition, up to 2 non-randomized, non-split-face run-in subjects will be treated with ELLANSÉ®-S by each investigator to allow the investigator to become familiar with injection characteristics. This run-in cohort will be required to meet all study inclusion/exclusion criteria and will be followed in the same manner as the non-run-in cohort. Up to seven US sites will participate.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ellanse S | Experimental | Polycaprolactone and carboxymethylcellulose gel based dermal filler |
|
| Calcium Hydroxylapatite | Active Comparator | Calcium Hydroxylapatite and carboxymethylcellulose gel based dermal filler |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellanse S | Device | Ellanse S polycaprolactone and carboxymethylcelluose gel based dermal filler syringe |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change in NLF WSRS score from baseline at 6 months by a live, masked reviewer | The primary effectiveness endpoint uses the 6-month and baseline Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) scores as determined by a live, masked reviewer. The change from baseline on the WSRS at 6 months of NLFs in the ELLANSÉ®-S treatment arm will be compared to that of NLFs in the Radiesse® control arm. The statistical objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority of WSRS improvement in the NLF indication of ELLANSÉ®-S to Radiesse®. Note: the WSRS provides 5 scoring options from 1 Absent to 5 Extreme. A lower score is a better clinical outcome. | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in mean change from baseline on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at 12 months as rated by a live, masked reviewer | Difference in mean change from baseline on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at 12 months as rated by a live, masked reviewer Note: the WSRS provides 5 scoring options from 1 Absent to 5 Extreme. A lower score is a better clinical outcome. | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The safety endpoint is to assess the rate and severity of adverse events from initial treatment through last study visit | The safety endpoint is to assess the rate and severity of adverse events from initial treatment through last study visit. All AEs that occur throughout the duration of the study will be captured. Adverse events will be categorized by type, duration, severity, relationship to the study device and need for treatment. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Only subjects meeting all of the following inclusion criteria will be considered for study enrollment:
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects having any of the following criteria, either at screening or at baseline, will not be included in the study:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Morris | Contact | +44 1244625120 | pmorris@sinclair.com | |
| Stuart R Boothman | Contact | +44 7739467256 | sboothman@sinclair.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jeremy B Green | Skin Research Institute LLC | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investigate MD | Not yet recruiting | Scottsdale | Arizona | 86260 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study is a "split face" design; subjects will be treated in one nasolabial fold on one side of the face with one treatment device and with the comparator device in the nasolabial fold on the other side
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Calcium Hydroxylapatite-based filler | Device | Calcium Hydroxylapatite and carboxymethylcellulose based filler |
|
| Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) response rate at 6 months as rated by the live, masked reviewer | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) response rate at 6 months as rated by the live, masked reviewer Note: There are 5 scoring options ranging from from "Very Much Improved" to "Worse" | 6 months |
| Difference in mean change in total score on the FACE-Q Appraisal of Nasolabial Folds Questionnaire at 6 months. | Difference in mean change in total score on the FACE-Q Appraisal of Nasolabial Folds Questionnaire at 6 months. Note: 4 responses can be chosen; not at all (1), a little (2), moderately (3) and extremely (4), a lower score is a better clinical outcome | 6 months |
| Difference in mean change in total score on the FACE-Q Appraisal of Nasolabial Folds Questionnaire at 12 months | Difference in mean change in total score on the FACE-Q Appraisal of Nasolabial Folds Questionnaire at 12 months. Note: 4 responses can be chosen; not at all (1), a little (2), moderately (3) and extremely (4), a lower score is a better clinical outcome | 12 months |
| Difference in mean change from baseline on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at 18 months as rated by a live, masked reviewer. | Difference in mean change from baseline on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at 18 months as rated by a live, masked reviewer. Note: the WSRS provides 5 scoring options from 1 Absent to 5 Extreme. A lower score is a better clinical outcome. | 18 months |
| Individual endpoints at each time point of, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18, and 24 months for responders on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), as determined by a live, masked reviewer.ry Endpoint 1 | Individual endpoints at each time point of, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18, and 24 months for responders on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), as determined by a live, masked reviewer. Note: the WSRS provides 5 scoring options from 1 Absent to 5 Extreme. A lower score is a better clinical outcome. | 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months |
| Individual endpoints at each time point of 6 weeks, 3, 9, and 24 months for change from baseline on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), as determined by a live, masked reviewer. | Individual endpoints at each time point of 6 weeks, 3, 9, and 24 months for change from baseline on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), as determined by a live, masked reviewer. Note: the WSRS provides 5 scoring options from 1 Absent to 5 Extreme. A lower score is a better clinical outcome. | 6 weeks, 3, 9 and 24 months |
| Individual endpoints at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, & 24 months for the comparative improvement on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) by subject of NLFs in the ELLANSÉ®-S arm to NLFs in the Radiesse® arm, as determined by a live, masked evaluator | Individual endpoints at each time point of 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months for the comparative improvement on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) by subject of NLFs in the ELLANSÉ®-S treatment arm to NLFs in the Radiesse® arm, as determined by a live, masked evaluator. Note: the WSRS provides 5 scoring options from 1 Absent to 5 Extreme. A lower score is a better clinical outcome. | 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months |
| Individual endpoints at each time point of 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months for change from baseline on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), as determined by a blinded photographic review panel | Individual endpoints at each time point of 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months for change from baseline on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), as determined by a blinded photographic review panel. Note: the WSRS provides 5 scoring options from 1 Absent to 5 Extreme. A lower score is a better clinical outcome. | 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months |
| Individual endpoints at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, & 24 months for the proportion of NLFs in the ELLANSÉ®-S arm compared to NLFs in the Radiesse® arm with ≥1 point improvement from baseline on the WSRS as determined by a blinded photographic review panel | Individual endpoints at each time point of 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months for the proportion of NLFs in the ELLANSÉ®-S treatment arm compared to that of NLFs in the Radiesse® arm with ≥1 point improvement from baseline on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), as determined by a blinded photographic review panel. Note: the WSRS provides 5 scoring options from 1 Absent to 5 Extreme. A lower score is a better clinical outcome. | 6 weeks, 3, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months |
| Individual endpoints at each time point of 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months for GAIS scores for ELLANSÉ®-S and Radiesse®. Individual endpoints for each rater type, as rated by: 1) Live masked evaluator 2) Treating investigator 3) The study subject | Individual endpoints at each time point of 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months for GAIS scores for ELLANSÉ®-S and Radiesse®. Individual endpoints for each rater type, as rated by:
| 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months |
| Individual endpoints at each time point of 6 weeks, 3, 9, 18, and 24 months for change from baseline for ELLANSÉ®-S and Radiesse® on the Subject FACE-Q Appraisal of Nasolabial Folds Questionnaire | Individual endpoints at each time point of 6 weeks, 3, 9, 18, and 24 months for change from baseline for ELLANSÉ®-S and Radiesse® on the Subject FACE-Q Appraisal of Nasolabial Folds Questionnaire. Note: 4 responses can be chosen; not at all (1), a little (2), moderately (3) and extremely (4), a lower score is a better clinical outcome | 6 weeks, 3, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months |
| Individual endpoints at each time point of 6 and 12 months for change from baseline for ELLANSÉ®-S and Radiesse® on the Subject FACE-Q Satisfaction with Outcome Scale | Individual endpoints at each time point of 6 and 12 months for change from baseline for ELLANSÉ®-S and Radiesse® on the Subject FACE-Q Satisfaction with Outcome Scale. Note: 4 responses can be chosen; definitely disagree (1), somewhat disagree (2) somewhat agree (3) and definitely agree (4); a higher score is a better clinical outcome | 6 and 12 months |
| Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain assessment in NLFs treated with ELLANSÉ®-S compared to NLFs treated with Radiesse® at initial injection | Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain assessment in NLFs treated with ELLANSÉ®-S compared to NLFs treated with Radiesse® at initial injection. Note: the scale ranges from 0 - no pain to 10 - worst pain with 0.5 point increments | Baseline, 4 week post injection touch up visits, optional 12 month retreatment, optional 18 month retreatment |
| Duration of treatment effect as measured on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) by ≥1 point improvement, for those NLFs that did not receive retreatment prior to the assessment time point at 18 and 24 months. | Duration of treatment effect as measured on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) by ≥1 point improvement, for those NLFs that did not receive retreatment prior to the assessment time point at 18 and 24 months. Note: the WSRS provides 5 scoring options from 1 Absent to 5 Extreme. A lower score is a better clinical outcome. Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months | 18 and 24 months |
| Duration of treatment effect as measured on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) by ≥1 point improvement, for those NLFs that did not receive retreatment prior to the assessment time point at 18 and 24 months. | Time until return to baseline on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) for NLFs in the ELLANSÉ®-S treatment arm compared to that of NLFs in the Radiesse® arm. Note: the WSRS provides 5 scoring options from 1 Absent to 5 Extreme. A lower score is a better clinical outcome. | Up to 24 months |
| Through to 24 months |
| Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills | Not yet recruiting | Encino | California | 91436 | United States |
|
| DMR Research, PLLC | Not yet recruiting | Westport | Connecticut | 06880 | United States |
|
| Skin Research Institute LLC | Recruiting | Miami | Florida | 33146 | United States |
|
| Callender Center for Clinical Research | Not yet recruiting | Glenn Dale | Maryland | 20769 | United States |
|
| Skincare Physicians | Not yet recruiting | Chestnut Hill | Massachusetts | 02467 | United States |
|
| Advanced Dermatology of Michigan | Not yet recruiting | Warren | Michigan | 48088 | United States |
|