Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Cwm Taf University Health Board (NHS) | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Acute Respiratory Infections (ARIs) are a major contributor to antibiotic resistance, largely due to the over prescription of antibiotics driven by the subjective nature of clinical assessment. The ASPIRE II study aims to evaluate whether a Point-of-Care (POC) diagnostic test, utilising C-reactive protein (CRP) and Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) biomarkers to differentiate between viral and bacterial infections can support clinical decision-making and serve as an effective antimicrobial stewardship tool.
In the first ASPIRE study, in which the POC test was taken after the consultation, 20 participants produced results in the ratio 10:7:3 (negative, bacterial, viral) with a 75% agreement to the antibiotic prescription given by the physician following face-to-face consultation. The observational ASPIRE I Study identified the need for a rapid POC test and highlighted areas in which the test could have been used to prevent over-prescribing of antibiotics when ARI's are identified as viral. The FebriDx POC test was also useful in identifying instances where antibiotics were not prescribed, when a bacterial infection is presented, proving an effective decision-making tool for antibiotic stewardship.
Antibiotic stewardship is fast becoming an essential measure to improve antibiotic prescribing by clinicians. Antibiotic stewardship not only presents a cost-effective strategy for the NHS but addressed the issue of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and protects patients from harm caused by unnecessary antibiotic use.
The economic costs of antibiotic resistance are largely unknown, but it is anticipated that with an increased number of cases, effects to the economy could be severe. Infections and infectious diseases cost England & Wales an estimated £30 billion a year, with many cases of acute respiratory infections (Chaplin, 2017). POC diagnostic tests in a clinical setting could give clinicians the ability to distinguish between microbial and viral infections, providing a more informed decision to antibiotic prescribing.
The purpose of this study is to build upon data generated by the ASPIRE study that determined by retrospective evaluation, that a POC immunoassay can accurately be used to guide clinician's prescription decision. The ASPIRE 2 study will use the POC assay as an interventional decision tool prior to the GP's consultation of a suspected acute respiratory infection (ARI).
Upon clinical assessment, the current clinical practice prescribes antibiotics based on symptoms reported by the patient and a subjective review by the GP. This results in antibiotics being prescribed from an informed decision made by the clinician, based only from patient symptoms. The use of a dual marker immunoassay could guide informed decisions based on qualitative data and degree of infection using POC testing in Primary Care.
The POC assay uses a dual marker immunoassay to differentiate between a viral and bacterial infection. C-reactive protein (CRP) is raised in the blood stream in response to inflammation. CRP can be elevated in viral infections, but generally the rise is to higher levels in bacterial infections, especially severe bacterial infections. Another blood protein, the MxA protein, is selectively increased in people with viral infections and therefore has the potential to greatly enhance the rapid distinction between viral and bacterial respiratory infections.
NICE guidance from 2014 recommends the use of CRP POC test in the diagnosis and appropriate management of lower respiratory tract infections in adults aged 18 and over (excluding people with COPD) after clinical assessment whether antibiotics should be prescribed. The study POC assay data could be used as an effective tool alongside NICE guidelines to prescribe antibiotics based on CRP concentration where an infection may be viral. Recent clinical studies suggest the POC test is highly effective, yielding over 80% sensitivity and over 90% specificity when identifying bacterial and viral infections in adults (NICE, 2020).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients Suspected with Acute Respiratory Infection | Other | Self-referred patients presenting ARI symptoms that have met the study inclusion criteria and have been recruited to the study. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FebriDx Point of Care Test | Device | Patients self-referring to their GP practice with symptoms of acute respiratory infection (ARI) will receive the FebriDx point-of-care test during their clinical consultation. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Concordance between FebriDx result and clinician decision | The level of agreement between the FebriDx classification (viral or bacterial) and the clinician's initial diagnostic impression and treatment decision, to prescribe antibiotics or not. | End of recruitment period. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity and Specificity of FebriDx vs. Clinical Judgement | Sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (true negative rate) of FebriDx in identifying bacterial or viral infections, using clinical decision as reference. | End of recruitment period . |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kier Hardie Practice 3 | Merthyr Tydfil | Rhondda Cynon Taff | United Kingdom | |||
| Oaktree Surgery |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study follows a single-group assignment model in which all participants presenting to general practice with symptoms of acute respiratory infection (ARI) undergo testing with a Point-of-Care (PoC) diagnostic device. The device measures C-reactive protein (CRP) and Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) to help differentiate between viral and bacterial infections. The intervention is applied uniformly, and outcomes such as test performance, diagnostic accuracy, clinician decision-making, and antibiotic prescribing behaviour are monitored prospectively. No randomisation or control arm is included, as the primary objective is to evaluate real-world clinical utility and diagnostic performance in a standard care setting.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Bridgend |
| United Kingdom |
| Meddygfa Glan Cynon Surgery | Mountain Ash | United Kingdom |