Efficacy of Powered Versus Manual Toothbrushes on Full-Mouth Bleeding and Plaque Scores in Patients With Stage 3 or 4 Periodontitis
Efficacy of Powered Versus Manual Toothbrushes on Full-Mouth Bleeding and Plaque Scores in Patients With Stage 3 or 4 Periodontitis
This study compares the effectiveness of powered and manual toothbrushes in reducing gum bleeding and dental plaque in people with stage 3 or 4 periodontitis. All participants are trained to brush for at least two minutes twice a day. The goal is to find out whether using a powered toothbrush leads to better oral hygiene results than a manual one, when brushing time is standardized. The study will measure bleeding and plaque levels at the beginning and over a 6-month period.
This single-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluates the clinical effectiveness of powered versus manual toothbrushing in patients newly diagnosed with stage 3 or 4 periodontitis. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups: powered toothbrush (Oral-B iO6) or manual toothbrush (TePe Select Soft). All participants receive standardized oral hygiene instructions and are instructed to brush twice daily for a minimum of two minutes. Manual brush users are required to use a smartphone app to monitor and record brushing duration. The use of adjunctive oral hygiene aids, such as mouthwash or interdental cleaners, is restricted throughout the study period. The primary clinical outcomes are full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) and full-mouth plaque score (FMPS), measured at baseline and at follow-ups of 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: