Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether non-invasive brain stimulation, called transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS), can reduce negative affect, and how expectations shaped by care providers influence these effects.
The main questions this study aims to answer are: (1)Does active tTIS reduce negative affect more effectively than sham (inactive) tTIS? (2)Do positive treatment expectations enhance the effects compared to negative expectations?
Participants will: (1) Receive either active or sham tTIS. (2) Be provided with positive or negative messaging regarding treatment effectiveness. (3) Interact with care providers and complete assessments measuring negative affect and physiological responses.
The study employs a within-subject, crossover factorial design, consisting of two experiments.
Experiment 1
In Experiment 1, 36 participants ('patients') will complete all combinations of two independent variables-stimulation type (active vs. sham tTIS) and placebo manipulation (positive vs. negative placebo messaging)-resulting in four sessions:
Participants complete three multimodal negative affect tasks (MNAT) before and after each stimulation session. Active tTIS delivers two signals at 2000 Hz and 2010 Hz, generating an 10 Hz interference beat targeted at the anterior/mid-cingulate cortex (aMCC) at 2 mA for 20 minutes. Sham tTIS uses same frequencies (2000 Hz and 2010 Hz), targeting the same region for only 80 seconds.
Sessions are administered in a counterbalanced order based on a Williams Balanced Latin Square to minimize order effects, with at least 48 hours between sessions. Participants thus serve as their own controls.
Experiment 2
Experiment 2 includes 160 participants divided into two groups: 120 'patients' and 40 'doctors'.
A within-subject crossover design is employed, focusing specifically on placebo manipulation effects. Patients complete two experimental sessions involving sham tTIS only:
In both sessions, patients complete the same MNAT tasks before and after stimulation. Sham tTIS involves a brief 15-second stimulation followed by no current for the remainder of the session, preserving the illusion of active stimulation.
'Doctors' are trained to administer the sham stimulation and deliver the placebo manipulation. During placebo induction sessions, providers simulate a "personalization" procedure, adjusting sham parameters while covertly reducing pain stimulus intensity to enhance placebo effects. Providers also monitor patients' nonverbal behavior and reported affect, offering feedback to enhance engagement and perceived treatment quality.
Participants undergo MRI scanning, physiological monitoring, and behavioral assessments during Experiment 2. Multimodal physiological data-including ECG, respiration, skin conductance, photoplethysmography (PPG), and trans-radial electrical bioimpedance velocimetry (TRVE)-are collected using the BIOPAC 160 system.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment 1 - Crossover Order: Session A-B-D-C | Experimental | Participants complete all four experimental sessions in the following sequence: 1. Session A; 2. Session B; 3. Session D; 4. Session C |
|
| Experiment 1- Crossover Order: Session B-C-A-D | Experimental | Participants complete all four experimental sessions in the following sequence: 1. Session B; 2. Session C; 3. Session A; 4. Session D |
|
| Experiment 1- Crossover Order: Session C-D-B-A | Experimental | Participants complete all four experimental sessions in the following sequence: 1. Session C; 2.Session D; 3. Session B; 4. Session A |
|
| Experiment 1- Crossover Order: Session D-A-C-B | Experimental | Participants complete all four experimental sessions in the following sequence: 1. Session D; 2. Session A; 3. Session C; 4. Session B |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Session A: Positive Placebo + Active tTIS | Behavioral | Participants receive active tTIS with two channels set at 2000 Hz and 2010 Hz, creating a 10 Hz interference beat targeting the anterior/mid-cingulate cortex (aMCC). Stimulation is delivered at 2 mA per channel for 20 minutes. The stimulation is combined with a positive social placebo intervention delivered by the care provider. Participants complete three multimodal negative affect tasks (MNAT) before and after the stimulation. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive effort ratings | Participants report cognitive effort after each trial on a Generalized Linear Magnitude scale (GLMS) with anchors of "No effort" and "Most effort imaginable". Raw units are on a 0-180 scale. | 3-10 sec post-stimulus throughout testing sessions, with all sessions complete within 1 month |
| Subjective fear ratings | Participants report subjective fear experience after each trial on a well-validated Generalized Linear Magnitude scale (GLMS) with anchors of "No fear" and "Most intense fear imaginable". Raw units are on a 0-180 scale. | 3-10 sec post-stimulus throughout testing sessions, with all sessions complete within 1 month |
| Pain ratings | Participants report subjective pain experience after each trial on a well-validated Generalized Linear Magnitude scale (GLMS) with anchors of "No pain" and "Most intense pain imaginable". Raw units are on a 0-180 scale. | 3-10 sec post-stimulus throughout testing sessions, with all sessions complete within 1 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Electrodermal autonomic responses to painful heat, fear-related images and cognitive effort | Skin conductance (EDA) is recorded continuously throughout test sessions and per-stimulus amplitude of canonical stimulus-locked EDA responses is reported in microsiemens (uS). Higher values indicate a higher EDA response. | Peri-stimulus throughout testing sessions, with all sessions complete within 1 month |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
'Doctors' are recruited from medical students at the Geisel School of Medicine and resident physicians at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC).
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhaoxing Wei, Ph.D. | Contact | 6033220577 | zhaoxing.wei@dartmouth.edu |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dartmouth College, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences | Recruiting | Hanover | New Hampshire | 03755 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36061593 | Background | Acerbo E, Jegou A, Luff C, Dzialecka P, Botzanowski B, Missey F, Ngom I, Lagarde S, Bartolomei F, Cassara A, Neufeld E, Jirsa V, Carron R, Grossman N, Williamson A. Focal non-invasive deep-brain stimulation with temporal interference for the suppression of epileptic biomarkers. Front Neurosci. 2022 Aug 17;16:945221. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.945221. eCollection 2022. | |
| 37857774 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Experiment 1 involves participants completing all conditions formed by combinations of active vs. sham transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS) and positive vs. negative placebo manipulations. The order of sessions is counterbalanced using a Williams Balanced Latin Square approach to minimize order effects, with each participant serving as their own control.
Experiment 2 specifically focuses on placebo manipulation effects. Participants complete two experimental sessions-one with placebo intervention (On-Placebo) and one without (Off-Placebo)-both sessions utilizing sham tTIS. Session order is counterbalanced, enabling each participant to act as their own control to isolate and assess the effects of the placebo manipulation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Experiment 2 - Crossover Order : Session E-F | Experimental | Participants complete all two experimental sessions in the following sequence: 1. Session E; 2. Session F |
|
| Experiment 2 - Crossover Order : Session F-E | Experimental | Participants complete all two experimental sessions in the following sequence: 1. Session F; 2. Session E |
|
|
| Session B: Positive Placebo + Sham tTIS | Behavioral | Participants receive sham tTIS (brief 80-second stimulation followed by no current) paired with a positive social placebo intervention. The device mimics active parameters (2 mA per channel, 20 minutes) without delivering effective stimulation. The sham stimulation is paired with a positive social placebo intervention. Participants complete three MNAT tasks before and after the session. |
|
| Session C: Negative Placebo + Active tTIS | Behavioral | Participants receive active tTIS (2000 Hz and 2010 Hz signals, 2 mA per channel, 20 minutes) combined with a negative social placebo intervention (neutral or skeptical messaging about treatment efficacy). Participants complete three MNAT tasks before and after the stimulation. |
|
| Session D: Negative Placebo + Sham tTIS | Behavioral | Participants receive sham tTIS (brief 80-second stimulation followed by no current) combined with a negative social placebo intervention. Participants complete three MNAT tasks before and after the session. |
|
| Session E: On-Placebo + Sham tTIS | Behavioral | Participants receive sham tTIS (brief 15-second stimulation followed by no current) paired with a positive social placebo intervention. Participants complete three MNAT tasks before and after the session. |
|
| Session F: Off-Placebo + Sham tTIS | Behavioral | Participants receive sham tTIS (brief 15-second stimulation, then no current) without any placebo intervention. Participants complete three MNAT tasks before and after the session. |
|
| Wessel MJ, Beanato E, Popa T, Windel F, Vassiliadis P, Menoud P, Beliaeva V, Violante IR, Abderrahmane H, Dzialecka P, Park CH, Maceira-Elvira P, Morishita T, Cassara AM, Steiner M, Grossman N, Neufeld E, Hummel FC. Noninvasive theta-burst stimulation of the human striatum enhances striatal activity and motor skill learning. Nat Neurosci. 2023 Nov;26(11):2005-2016. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01457-7. Epub 2023 Oct 19. |
| 35839572 | Background | von Conta J, Kasten FH, Schellhorn K, Curcic-Blake B, Aleman A, Herrmann CS. Benchmarking the effects of transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS) in humans. Cortex. 2022 Sep;154:299-310. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.05.017. Epub 2022 Jun 16. |
| 37857775 | Background | Violante IR, Alania K, Cassara AM, Neufeld E, Acerbo E, Carron R, Williamson A, Kurtin DL, Rhodes E, Hampshire A, Kuster N, Boyden ES, Pascual-Leone A, Grossman N. Non-invasive temporal interference electrical stimulation of the human hippocampus. Nat Neurosci. 2023 Nov;26(11):1994-2004. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01456-8. Epub 2023 Oct 19. |
| 38811696 | Background | Vassiliadis P, Beanato E, Popa T, Windel F, Morishita T, Neufeld E, Duque J, Derosiere G, Wessel MJ, Hummel FC. Non-invasive stimulation of the human striatum disrupts reinforcement learning of motor skills. Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Aug;8(8):1581-1598. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01901-z. Epub 2024 May 29. |
| 37405829 | Background | Sandra DA, Olson JA, Langer EJ, Roy M. Presenting a sham treatment as personalised increases the placebo effect in a randomised controlled trial. Elife. 2023 Jul 5;12:e84691. doi: 10.7554/eLife.84691. |
| 28575667 | Background | Grossman N, Bono D, Dedic N, Kodandaramaiah SB, Rudenko A, Suk HJ, Cassara AM, Neufeld E, Kuster N, Tsai LH, Pascual-Leone A, Boyden ES. Noninvasive Deep Brain Stimulation via Temporally Interfering Electric Fields. Cell. 2017 Jun 1;169(6):1029-1041.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.024. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided