Comparative Efficacy of ADM Hydrogel vs. Alginate Dressings in Chronic Trauma Wounds

A Randomized, Outcome Assessor-Blinded Clinical Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) Hydrogel Versus Alginate Dressings in the Treatment of Chronic Traumatic Wounds

The goal of this clinical trial is to find out whether a wound treatment made from acellular dermal matrix (ADM) gel can help heal chronic traumatic wounds more effectively than standard alginate dressings in adults aged 18 and older with wounds that have lasted more than 3 weeks.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does ADM gel reduce the size of chronic wounds more than alginate dressings after 12 weeks?

Does ADM gel help wounds heal faster and improve quality of life for patients?

Researchers will compare ADM gel to alginate dressings to see if the ADM gel leads to better healing results and fewer complications.

Participants will:

Be randomly assigned to receive either ADM gel or alginate dressing.

Have the treatment applied directly to their cleaned wound.

Attend weekly visits for up to 12 weeks for wound checks, measurements, and dressing changes.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Chronic trauma wounds persisting ≥3 weeks.
• Wound size between 4 and 20 cm² and depth ≤9 mm on the lower limbs.
• Willingness and ability to provide informed consent.
• Wounds without uncontrolled infection

Exclusion Criteria:

• Wounds with exposed bone.
• Current use of immunomodulators, corticosteroids, immunosuppressive or cytotoxic drugs.
• Pregnant individuals.
• Significant reduction (≥30%) of wound size during a 2-week run-in phase.
• Concurrent participation in another clinical trial involving drugs.
• Wounds with uncontrolled infection
• Allergy or hypersensitivity to components of ADM gel or alginate