Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDRCB : 2025-A00416-43 | Other Identifier | ANSM |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The DENUTADOM study is a single-center feasibility study. It is an interventional research project involving human subjects (RIPH2), which will lead to a change in the care and treatment of adult patients diagnosed as suffering from moderate to severe undernutrition during hospitalization. The aim of this study was to assess patient compliance with a new undernutrition management program (diet and physical activity) at discharge from hospital.
In this study, during hospitalization, patients may be included in the study if they meet the inclusion criteria. To this end, the physician will offer to participate in the study, and will provide the patient with an information document. If the patient agrees to take part, he or she will be included in the study after signing the consent form. Participation will last 3 months.
On inclusion, after seeing the physician, an adapted physical activity teacher (EAPA) and a hospital dietician will assess the patient's physical capacities and dietary needs, in order to draw up an adapted physical and dietary program. The CRA will assess the patient's quality of life using a questionnaire. When the patient is discharged, he will be given a notebook in which to keep track of appointments with healthcare professionals (GP, private dietician, EAPA). Patients are also asked to keep a record of their non-protocol care appointments and participation in physical activities.
After hospitalization, the patient will have to follow a multi-professional program: dietetic by a private dietician (at D3-J5, at 3 weeks and then at 6 weeks), medical by the general practitioner (at 1 month), and adapted physical activity by the EAPA (during 3 months).
At three months, the patient will be seen again by the hospital's health professionals. The investigating physician will reassess nutritional status, and the EAPA will reassess physical capacity. The patient will be asked to return his diary so that data can be collected. They will also be given a quality of life and satisfaction questionnaire to complete.
When all patients have completed their follow-up, a satisfaction questionnaire will be sent to each healthcare professional.
Currently, as part of standard care, , dietetics and physical rehabilitation are not reimbursed. As a result, although recommended, patients rarely benefit from a dietetic consultation and adapted physical activity follow-up following a diagnosis of undernutrition. We therefore hypothesize that early cooperative outpatient care, involving general practitioners, private dieticians and adapted physical activity teachers (EAPA), for adult patients diagnosed as moderately or severely malnourished during hospitalization will optimize the management of these patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| After-hospital, care by a private dietician and a physical activity teacher | Experimental | For this study, there is only one arm. After hospital discharge, the patient will have multi-professional monitoring of his undernutrition: private dietician, adapted physical activity teacher and general practitioner. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dietary and physical activity monitoring during the 3-months post-hospitalization period | Other | Three consultations with a private dietician, one consultation with the general practitioner, three months of APA monitoring |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate patient compliance with a new management program (dietetics and physical rehabilitation) for undernutrition on discharge from hospital | Assessment of patient compliance with the innovative program will be based on their participation in the various consultations under the protocol (medical, dietary, physical rehabilitation), as well as in their adapted physical activity program. The clinical research associate in charge of the study will collect these data from the data transmitted by the professionals in charge of the patient's follow-up (physician, dietician, EAPA), as well as from the follow-up booklet completed by the patient. Adherence will be measured by analyzing deviations from consultations and APA sessions scheduled as part of the protocol, by category:
| Only once, at the 3 months follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate the patient's grip strength during the study | Grip strength will be assessed using the handgrip, enabling muscle strength to be measured in kg. The grip strength test will be performed according to the Southampton protocol. | Three times : At inclusion, at 1 month and 3 months after inclusion |
| Evaluate the speed of chair lifting during the study |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre hospitalier Henri Mondor d'Aurillac | Aurillac | 15000 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Chair-lifting speed is assessed by the 5 chair-lifts test. This is a benchmark test for assessing muscle strength. |
| Three times : At inclusion, at 1 month and 3 months after inclusion |
| Evaluate the walking speed during the study | Walking speed is assessed by the 4-meter walking test (4MWT). Walking speed over 4 meters is assessed to the nearest 0.01 second using a stopwatch. The test will be carried out twice in succession, and the fastest walking speed, expressed in m/s, will be used. | Three times : At inclusion, at 1 month and 3 months after inclusion |
| Evaluate the patient's weight during the study | Weight will be measured in kilograms. Weight measurements at D0 and M3 will be taken on the same model of scale. As weight measurement at M1 is carried out at the attending physician's, the scale used will be different from that used for the other two measurement points. | Three times : At inclusion, at 1 month and 3 months after inclusion |
| Evaluate the patient's nutrition status during the study | The status of "undernourished" / "not undernourished" will be determined on the basis of the definition given in the latest HAS recommendations (Diagnosis of undernutrition in children and adults - November 2019 and Diagnosis of undernutrition in people aged 70 and over - November 2021). | Twice : At inclusion and at 3 months after inclusion |
| Evaluate the patient's biological parameters during the study : phosphorus, magnesium, potassium, calcemia, corrected calcemia and transferrin-binding capacity | The results of these biological parameters prescribed as standard for monitoring undernutrition will be recorded during the three medical visits, if values are available. The unit of measurement for these blood parameters will be the mmol/L. | Three times : At inclusion, at 1 month and 3 months after inclusion |
| Evaluate the patient's biological parameters relating to liver activity during the study : ASAT, ALAT, PAL, gamma-GT | The results of these biological parameters prescribed as standard for monitoring undernutrition will be recorded during the three medical visits, if values are available. The unit of measurement for these blood parameters will be the UI/L. | Three times : At inclusion, at 1 month and 3 months after inclusion |
| Evaluate the patient's biological parameters during the study : albumin, pre-albumin, CRP, ferritin | The results of these biological parameters prescribed as standard for monitoring undernutrition will be recorded during the three medical visits, if values are available. The unit of measurement for these blood parameters will be the g/L. | Three times : At inclusion, at 1 month and 3 months after inclusion |
| Evaluate the patient's quality of life during the study by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. | Patients' quality of life will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire at three medical visits. The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire consists of a descriptive section and a visual analog scale. The descriptive part comprises five dimensions: mobility, personal care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is rated by the patient according to 5 degrees: no problems, mild problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The visual scale is a vertical analog scale, with the ends labelled "the best health you can imagine" (score : 100) and "the worst health you can imagine" (score : 0). The difference in score between the baseline and the two follow-up visits will be measured. | Three times : At inclusion, at 1 month and 3 months after inclusion |
| Evaluate end-of-study re-hospitalization and mortality rates | The number of re-hospitalized and deceased patients will be collected by the CRA from the patient's medical file and after discussion with the healthcare professionals in charge of the patient's follow-up. | Only once, at the 3 months follow-up |
| Evaluate patient satisfaction with their care at the end of the study | It will be assessed using a 5-point satisfaction scale, from very dissatisfied to very satisfied. | Only once, at the 3 months follow-up |
| At the end of the study, assess patients' consumption of out-of-protocol care | The use of dietary consultations, out-of-protocol physical rehabilitation sessions and complementary general medical consultations will be recorded by the CRA using a follow-up booklet completed by the patient. | Only once, at the 3 months follow-up |
| Evaluate the satisfaction of each professional involved (doctor, dietician, EAPA) in this protocol | The satisfaction of each professional involved (doctor, dietician, EAPA) in this protocol for the early management of undernutrition will be assessed using a 5-point satisfaction scale, from very dissatisfied to very satisfied. | Only once, at the study completion |
| Evaluate the medico-economic relevance of this new pathway for the early management of undernutrition | A cost-utility analysis will be carried out from both a societal and a health insurance perspective, in order to measure the relevance of the allocative efficiency of expenditure at M3. Utility will be calculated in relation to quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D-5L. Costs will be calculated on the basis of the following data:
| Only once, at the 3 months follow-up |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D044342 | Malnutrition |
| D008224 | Lymphoma, Follicular |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009748 | Nutrition Disorders |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D008228 | Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin |
| D008223 | Lymphoma |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D008232 | Lymphoproliferative Disorders |
| D008206 | Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D007160 | Immunoproliferative Disorders |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004032 | Diet |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009747 | Nutritional Physiological Phenomena |
| D000066888 | Diet, Food, and Nutrition |
| D010829 | Physiological Phenomena |
Not provided
Not provided