Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a post-market (Phase IV) randomized, controlled, blinded, multicenter study with the aim to determine the added value of staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy compared to a group of patients on previous unilateral treatment combined with local standard medical treatment.
In patients who have undergone previous unilateral Exablate thalamotomy for Essential Tremor, the aim of this trial is to determine the effect of staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy compared to a group of patients on previous unilateral treatment. The effect will be measured on tremor reduction, functional impairment, disease-specific quality of life, adverse events and patient-perception of the overall treatment result in patients eligible for a staged bilateral Exablate procedure.
Patients assigned to the treatment arm will receive staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy. Patients assigned to control group will remain under local standard medical treatment.
The primary efficacy study objective is to demonstrate that Exablate staged-bilateral thalamotomy treatment reduces tremor, as measured by Treated Upper Limb CRST (A+B) (0-28) score, to a higher extent than those remaining on previous unilateral Exablate thalamotomy at 6 months.
The primary safety study objective is to assess the adverse events (AEs) of Exablate staged-bilateral thalamotomy treatment in comparison to those remaining on unilateral treatment (control group) plus medical treatment, including AE type, incidence, severity and duration at 6 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exablate Arm | Experimental | Subjects will receive staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy. |
|
| Control Arm | Active Comparator | Subjects will continue with their standard of care treatment for 6 months. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy | Procedure | Staged bilateral Exablate thalamotomy in ET patients |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Treated Upper Limb Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) (A+B) (0-28) score for the treated side. | The primary endpoint is the difference of the Treated Upper Limb CRST (A+B) score between groups at 6 months. Higher score means a worse tremor. | 6 Months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Treated Upper Limb Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) (A+B) (0-28) score as assessed by the blinded reviewers of the video-recordings. | Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Treated Upper Limb CRST (A+B) score as assessed by the blinded reviewers of the video-recordings. Higher score means a worse tremor. | 6 Months, 12 Months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Objective assessment of specific adverse events | Objective assessment of specific adverse events will be carried out for Speech, Gait and Motor Strength at baseline and 6 months and eventually at 12 months. If the adverse reported in the objective assessment is resolved at 6 months (Speech, Gait and Motor strength) it will not be carried out for the 12-month visit. | 6 Months, 12 Months |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pascalle Reiters | Contact | +31 653726776 | pascaller@insightec.com | |
| Insightec | Contact | clinicalresearchquestions@insightec.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Günther Deuschl | Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel (UKSH) | Principal Investigator |
| Steffen Paschen | Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel (UKSH) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turku University Hospital | Recruiting | Turku | FI20520 | Finland |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020329 | Essential Tremor |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009069 | Movement Disorders |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects will be videotaped while undergoing a standardized total CRST assessment at baseline and at the 6-month visit (use a standardized video-protocol). Subjects will wear head covers so that the investigator cannot tell whether the patient has received hair shaving to prepare for the FUS-intervention. Video-recordings will be assessed by two blinded core reviewers (i.e., certified Movement Disorder Neurologists, selected by the study Steering Committee (SC) for this task).
The video recordings are played in random order with respect to patients and study time points to minimize reviewer bias.
| Local standard medical treatment after previous Exablate unilateral thalamotomy. | Other | Local standard medical treatment |
|
| Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) part A (0-76) | Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in resting, postural, and action tremors of all items as measured by CRST part A. Higher score means a worse tremor. | 6 Months, 12 Months |
| Bilateral Upper Limb Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) (A+B) (0-56) | Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Bilateral Upper Limb CRST (A+B). Higher score means a worse tremor. | 6 Months, 12 Months |
| Total Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) (A+B) (0-116) | Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Total CRST (A+B). Higher score means a worse tremor. | 6 Months, 12 Months |
| Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) part C (0-32) | Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in functional disabilities as measured by CRST part C. Higher score means a worse tremor. | 6 Months, 12 Months |
| Axial Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) (0-20) | Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Axial CRST defined as face, tongue, head tremor and voice items of CRST part A | 6 Months, 12 Months |
| Quality of life questionnaire | Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in disease specific QOL | 6 Months, 12 Months |
| Change of tremor medication | Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in tremor medication change | 6 Months, 12 Months |
| Safety: Incidence and frequency of adverse events related to the treatment. | Incidence and frequency of adverse events related to the treatment and/or procedure. The investigator will capture any untoward events in the case report forms along with severity, duration, and resolution, and whether the event is considered serious. The severity of adverse events will be categorized according to the definition of adverse events from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). | 6 Months, 12 Months |
| Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). PGIC is a 7-point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Higher score means a worse condition. | 6 Months, 12 Months |
| Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) | Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC). The CGIC comprises two companion one-item measures evaluating the following: (a) severity of pathology from 1 to 7 and (b) change from the initiation of treatment on a similar seven-point scale. Higher score means a worse condition. | 6 Months, 12 Months |
| Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CaGIC) | Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Caregiver Global Impression of Change (CaGIC). The CaGIC comprises two companion one-item measures evaluating the following: (a) severity of pathology from 1 to 7 and (b) change from the initiation of treatment on a similar seven-point scale. Higher score means a worse condition. | 6 Months, 12 Months |
| Beck Depression Inventory II | Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II). The Beck Depression Inventory is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory and is composed of items relating to symptoms of depression. | 6 Months, 12 Months |
| Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) | Between group comparison through month 6 and within group comparison vs baseline up to month 12 in MoCA Score. The MoCA is a validated assessment that is used to detect cognitive impairment. | 6 Months, 12 Months |
| Responder analysis | A responder analysis will be performed to compute the proportion of subjects achieving a clinically satisfactory result. The CRST will be used. The responder analysis will be based on this scoring:
| 6 Months |
| Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel (UKSH) | Recruiting | Kiel | 24105 | Germany |
|
| Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta | Recruiting | Milan | 20133 | Italy |
|
| Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital | Recruiting | Badalona | 08916 | Spain |
|
| HM CINAC- Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur | Recruiting | Móstoles | 28938 | Spain |
|
| Clinica Universidad de Navarra | Recruiting | Pamplona | 31008 | Spain |
|
| Ascires Hospital_ECG Salud | Active, not recruiting | Valencia | 46014 | Spain |
| The Walton Center | Not yet recruiting | Liverpool | L97LJ | United Kingdom |
|