Comparison of the Efficacy of Sublingual Misoprostol and Intravenous Tranexamic Acid for Postpartum Hemorrhage Prophylaxis in Cesarean Delivery
Comparison of the Efficacy of Sublingual Misoprostol and Intravenous Tranexamic Acid for Postpartum Hemorrhage Prophylaxis in Cesarean Delivery
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is an obstetric emergency, with an estimated incidence ranging from 2.8% to 7.9%. Recent studies indicate an increasing trend in the frequency of PPH.Although it is more commonly seen in developing countries, it remains a significant cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Therefore, early diagnosis and prompt, accurate intervention are critically important.
Despite the rising incidence of PPH, maternal mortality rates have declined. This improvement is largely attributed to better identification of risk factors, timely diagnosis, and effective intervention.
To prevent PPH globally, active management of the third stage of labor has been widely implemented. This approach includes the use of pharmacologic agents, uterine massage, and controlled traction for placental delivery.Among pharmacological agents, the most commonly used include oxytocin, ergot alkaloids (e.g., ergometrine), tranexamic acid, prostaglandin E1 (misoprostol), prostaglandin F2α, and oxytocin analogues (e.g., carbetocin).Oxytocin is the most widely used agent for PPH prophylaxis.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of tranexamic acid and misoprostol in the prophylaxis of postpartum hemorrhage.
The study included elective cases scheduled for repeat cesarean delivery (women with a prior cesarean delivery) at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, Maternity Ward of Etlik City Hospital, between December 2023 and December 2024.
Patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 received tranexamic acid (Transamin 10% ampoule, 2.5 mL/250 mg, Actavis Pharmaceuticals, Turkey); 1 gram was administered intravenously during the lower uterine segment incision. Group 2 received misoprostol (Cytotec, 200 mcg tablet, Pfizer Inc., USA); 400 mcg were administered sublingually immediately after delivery and cord clamping. Group 3 (control) received no additional pharmacological agent. All patients received 20 IU oxytocin (Synpitan Forte, 5 IU/mL ampoule, IM/IV, Deva Holding A.Ş., Turkey).
Despite treatment, in cases of intraoperative or postoperative hemorrhage due to uterine atony, additional interventions were performed (additional oxytocin, Bakri balloon, uterine/hypogastric artery ligation, B-Lynch/Hayman sutures, or hysterectomy); these patients were excluded from the final analysis.
Parameters examined: operative time; preoperative and 24-hour postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit; pulse rate and shock index at 0 and 24 hours; postoperative complications; and blood transfusion requirement.
Sample size was estimated using G*Power 3.1. With α = 0.05, 80% power, and three study arms, the required sample size was calculated as 156 participants (52 per group). Seventy participants were initially enrolled per group to allow for losses; after exclusions, 192 participants (60 misoprostol, 67 TXA, 65 control) were included in the final analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27. A 95% confidence interval was used, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients aged 18-45 years Gestational age between 37 and 41 weeks Prior cesarean delivery (repeat elective cesarean section) Performed cesarean section for delivery
Exclusion Criteria: